Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Homosexual Mafia attacks the "Door to the Right"
TaxRelief ^ | October 19, 2004 | TaxRelief

Posted on 10/19/2004 5:17:28 PM PDT by TaxRelief

History has shown that the neutral position is the most dangerous position to take. Unfortunately for Bill O'Reilly, the host of Fox News' O'Reilly Factor and the target of sexual harassment lawsuit, his attempts at reasonableness are neither liberal enough for the hard left nor conservative enough for the solid right.

Conservatives bite the hand that feeds them when they fail to recognize that O'Reilly, in his position as an independent moderate, provides the perfect doorway through which a maturing, political aficionado can pass as he discovers the dangerous liberal slant of the mainstream media. (Certainly, a budding neo-con does not wake up one morning to the sudden discovery that he is ready for conservatism "al Sean Hannity.")

O'Reilly's political positions--his support of abortion, homosexual adoption, homosexual marriage, fiscal conservatism and limited government; and his opposition to animal rights activists, "feminazis" and environmental whackos-- parallel very closely the interim stage that many moderates pass through on their journey from the young, brainwashed me-generation to the more logical realm of adult conservatism.

O'Reilly practices Catholicism exactly the way John Kerry does; He professes a distaste for abortion, but implies that abortion, other than partial-birth abortion, should not be limited by law. (If this logic was carried out to its conclusion with any existing law, we'd be in total disarray--I don't believe in euthanizing disloyal spouses, but who am I to interfere with your household?) Because Bill O'Reilly has only babies in his home, he has not yet experienced the introspection that parents are forced to encounter sooner or later as they help their children grow in faith within the church.

The political stance of O'Reilly, and others moving away from the left, has not slipped past the attention of the Homosexual Mafia or past the strategists in the Democrat Party. By way of example, John Kerry's stated position about the deficit is that it can be blamed solely on "big Republican" spending. Kerry obviously believes that the wider he makes the stated definition of liberalism, the more people who might otherwise be attracted to conservatism, he will be able to keep in the camp. Unfortunately for all of the left, however, more and more adults are doing their homework and recognizing the inconsistencies between liberal promises and the reality after a liberal is elected.

An exploration of the social history of America and the MSM (mainstream media) reveals overwhelming evidence that the Homosexual Mafia, more than forty years ago, rested on a strategy to control public opinion by infiltrating the media and moving into powers of position within newspaper publishing houses, TV production studios and Public Radio. For the first twenty of these years, it was not openly obvious that they had positioned themselves so well.

Eventually conservatives in positions of power began to recognize that the right was well behind the social engineering curve, so they rose up and attempted to fight back with reason and competition. But they were too late. The social control of the "civil rights" crowd , the monopolies of small city publications and the power of "political correctness" in the schools were too strong, and forced them to turn to new venues, the "new media"--talk radio, cable news, conservative publications, the internet and finally bloggers --was born.

As a key member of this New Media, Bill O'Reilly is now a serious threat to the radical leftists' civil-rights agenda, and apparently is more than the Homosexual Mafia can control. Al Franken, in his position not only as a spokesman for the Homosexual Agenda, but also as a general in his political army, went on a blatant attack of O'Reilly with his book and, more subtly, by naming his competing radio show The O'Franken Factor. Given that these latest strategies have not worked--they didn't even dent O'Reilly's ratings--Franken, according to the manager of a restaurant patronized by the liberal media, is in cohorts with Andrea Mackris, O'Reilly's staff member known for her "sexual rants and drunken propositions." Mackris hopes to publish a tome that paints O'Reilly as anything but conservative, Franken-style, in an attempt to break any remaining ties between O'Reilly and his semi-conservative followers.

Perhaps O'Reilly's recent iteration of his softened stance on the integration of homosexuals into normal society occurred because he recognized the impending threat from the Homosexual Mafia.

Unfortunately, O'Reilly has not realized that he is making a serious mistake by supporting a left social agenda. Other than people in transition from one political position to another, there is no established middle ground in the media. There is no established group of followers and their are no supporters of the "middle ground." Indeed, by definition, the moderates are transitional and wishy-washy, and they are therefore not in a position to rise up and defend Bill O'Reilly.

So, Bill O'Reilly is all alone.

It is up to the supporters of the New Media to rise to the occasion. Allowing the Homosexual Mafia and the MSM to win this battle will give the leftists the courage to continue their attacks, and next time they may take on one of the better known heroes of freedom such as Ann Coulter or Neal Boortz.

Conservatives and libertarians must get off their high horses and recognize that which those who wish to dictate the social agenda of America recognize:

If Bill O'Reilly is taken down, a "Door to the Right" will, for at least a while, be closed in the faces of those who are ready to begin a journey towards truth and the conservative, comfort zone of the New Media.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adulterer; alfranken; andreamackris; billoreilly; codepink; eraofcredibility; fairandbalanced; filthyoldman; foxnew; foxnews; gaymarriage; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; lecher; leftie; liar; masturbator; msm; nambla; newmedia; nospinzone; oreilly; oreillylawsuit; oreillyscandal; phony; queer; sleazebag; spineless; thefactor; thug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-230 next last
To: Bonaparte
So which homosexual and leftist "historians" sold you that bill of goods? Since you don't know what's in the Bible and don't know what Paul and others were preaching at the time

Actually, if you have studied history, you will know that the tactics of politics, and lawyers for that matter, haven't really changed in the past 2300 years.

Christianity grew out of Judaism and most early Christians were Jews.

Yes and no, the Jews originally rejected Jesus and the christians did not really embrace old testament Judaic teachings until after the first Bible was compiled during the rule Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th (300's) century AD.

81 posted on 10/19/2004 9:07:25 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

Just answer the Question and stop dancing around it your starting to bore me . What rights are homosexuals denied? Answer the questions then we can debate all the crap your throwing in my face while not answering my question. I answered you now answer me, If your not willing just say so!


82 posted on 10/19/2004 9:08:38 PM PDT by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Without God, nothing you do will come to anything. The Founders understood this. You have either forgotten or you never learned it. An immoral people cannot remain free.

What more evil Godless movement in the world is there than 'bureaucracy'!

83 posted on 10/19/2004 9:09:58 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: jamesissmall218
"O'Reilly is not a supporter of abortion, he's pro-life..."

I sat right there watching him tell Charles Gibson that he thought a woman's decision to abort her child was a "private matter" and nobody should tell her what to do. I also heard him state that abortion should not be made illegal, except for PBA. O'Reilly is pro-Abortion no matter what he says about his personal opposition to it. He's just as hypocritical as kerry on this.

84 posted on 10/19/2004 9:12:52 PM PDT by Bonaparte (twisting slowly, slowly in the wind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

But how is he lying? You haven't been reading Al Franken's book, have you?

O'Reilly doesn't claim to be a conservative or a Republican or a Libertarian. He says he's a registered independent. Sounds right.


85 posted on 10/19/2004 9:13:00 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

Also remember that even today, almost 10 years after the declassification of the Venona Intercepts, the Communist media is still lying about McCarthy:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/mccarthy/

In history textbooks pushed within our public education system, the truth is not told about McCarthy.



86 posted on 10/19/2004 9:13:05 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (These Commies are ruining our country...........WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: jamesissmall218
"O'Reilly is not a supporter of abortion, he's pro-life..."

I sat right there watching him tell Charles Gibson that he thought a woman's decision to abort her child was a "private matter" and nobody should tell her what to do. I also heard him state that abortion should not be made illegal, except for PBA. O'Reilly is pro-Abortion no matter what he says about his personal opposition to it. He's just as hypocritical as kerry on this.

87 posted on 10/19/2004 9:13:15 PM PDT by Bonaparte (twisting slowly, slowly in the wind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155
Just answer the Question and stop dancing around it your starting to bore me . What rights are homosexuals denied?

It depends, do you view marriage as a right or a privilege. Honestly as I said in a previous post to you, I am not sure.

Answer the questions then we can debate all the crap your throwing in my face while not answering my question.

I am just pointing out possible holes in the 'husband and wife, marriage amendment' arguement and you just don't want to listen. It is best to get this holes addressed BEFORE you put it in the Constitution.

88 posted on 10/19/2004 9:16:32 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

What rights are homosexuals denied?


89 posted on 10/19/2004 9:20:22 PM PDT by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
"What more evil Godless movement in the world is there than 'bureaucracy'!"

You didn't hear a word I said, did you? Massive, runaway government bureaucracy is only one of many manifestations of the enslavement of a people. But all of them arise from the same source -- the denial that those freedoms we cherish come from God and God alone. Read our basic founding documents. Turn your back on God and it won't matter what else you do. He comes first, He gets his right off the top.

90 posted on 10/19/2004 9:21:31 PM PDT by Bonaparte (twisting slowly, slowly in the wind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
In history textbooks pushed within our public education system, the truth is not told about McCarthy.

I trust that you don't have any of your loved ones in that cesspool!

You point out some good resources with which all Americans should be acquainted. Additionally, while you can slog through the Venona Papers, you can also be inspired by Whittaker Chambers' Witness, or you can take the lazy approach and laugh through Ann Coulter's summary in Treason.

91 posted on 10/19/2004 9:21:50 PM PDT by Huber (I have a PLAN for energy sufficiency through perpetual motion, and a PLAN to be popular in France...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
"He says he's a registered independent."

Registered Independent status only means you are not affiliated with any political party. You can be anything you want and still be an "independent." You can be a Maoist, you can be an anarchist, you can even be a phony, lying liberal like O'Reilly.

92 posted on 10/19/2004 9:24:48 PM PDT by Bonaparte (twisting slowly, slowly in the wind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155
What rights are homosexuals denied?

Aren't they denied the right to slovenly dressing habits (or is that just a coincidence)?

93 posted on 10/19/2004 9:27:41 PM PDT by Huber (I have a PLAN for energy sufficiency through perpetual motion, and a PLAN to be popular in France...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"It is glaringly obvious..."

Exactly. Gramsci was stating the obvious. The writing was on the wall. The wheels were all ready in motion.

MacCarthy was right, too.

But that still doesn't answer the question of "why?" the social controllers are achieving greater success in certain liberal subgroups than others.

The Homosexual Mafia has a mind of its own. They are less likely to bow to communists than Christians are. They have their own plan and it is the same plan that they had 2000 years ago when they began the process of causing the fall of Rome. It's all about shaking off the "chains" of Christianity and Judaism.


94 posted on 10/19/2004 9:28:13 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

What lie has he told (on the air)?


95 posted on 10/19/2004 9:29:21 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: KingNo155

I answered your question. You just refuse to accept my answer, which was in the form of a question because I not sure on the subject.


97 posted on 10/19/2004 9:32:13 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
...do you view marriage as a right or a privilege...?

Neither. Marriage was always about the offspring, it was never about the adults. Marriage protects the welfare of children and as a result society is enhanced.

98 posted on 10/19/2004 9:33:29 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: Bonaparte
You didn't hear a word I said, did you? Massive, runaway government bureaucracy is only one of many manifestations of the enslavement of a people. But all of them arise from the same source -- the denial that those freedoms we cherish come from God and God alone. Read our basic founding documents. Turn your back on God and it won't matter what else you do. He comes first, He gets his right off the top.

I read every word you stated in that reply, which was; Without God, nothing you do will come to anything. The Founders understood this. You have either forgotten or you never learned it. An immoral people cannot remain free.

It's your own fault you did not elaborate on the subject.

100 posted on 10/19/2004 9:35:53 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson