1 posted on
10/18/2004 7:11:03 AM PDT by
qam1
To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; malakhi; m18436572; ...
Another thing we have to pay for
Xer Ping
Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social aspects that directly effects Gen-Reagan/Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
2 posted on
10/18/2004 7:12:19 AM PDT by
qam1
(McGreevy likes his butts his way, I like mine my way - so NO SMOKING BANS in New Jersey)
To: qam1
"
And while drugs that enable a healthy sex life may make seniors happy, its difficult to argue that theyre medically necessary."
Amen to that. If I cannot have a happy sex life neither can seniors! :) J/k
3 posted on
10/18/2004 7:14:26 AM PDT by
Americanwolf
(Paintball Gun: $44..Accessories: $55. Protecting campaign sign from Union thugs: Priceless!)
To: qam1
I think the impotence drugs should be given over the counter to any male who can prove he is over a particular age, say 30.
4 posted on
10/18/2004 7:16:08 AM PDT by
syriacus
(VANESSA Kerry would probably say she's glad her father didn't destroy her for stem cell research.)
To: qam1
Unintended consequences ---
- Drugs to treat STDs will be prescribed more often.
- More pregnancies will occur
- More abortions will occur.
6 posted on
10/18/2004 7:23:14 AM PDT by
syriacus
(VANESSA Kerry would probably say she's glad her father didn't destroy her for stem cell research.)
To: qam1
Yeah...isn't it great that part of our tax dollars pay for some old fogie to have a hard-on? (through a
RECREATIONAL drug no less?) Makes you proud to be an American.
It be pretty nice if I had a little more recreation in my life too...OOoops...that would mean I'd have to work less or stop WORKING all together.
*rolls eyes*
Whatever. (shaking head)
7 posted on
10/18/2004 7:25:49 AM PDT by
BureaucratusMaximus
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton)
To: qam1
I would think, if you were to talk to Teresa Heinz Kerry she would say it's
enough already that she pays for John's Cialis.
She'd say "Let the American taxpayers pay for all the other men's Cialis prescriptions."
8 posted on
10/18/2004 7:29:54 AM PDT by
syriacus
(VANESSA Kerry would probably say she's glad her father didn't destroy her for stem cell research.)
To: qam1
My medical plan will only furnish one(1) 10 mg. dosage of Cialis per week. I have to con samples from my GP to fill in the other 6 days of the week. They give you a slight headache but it's not even close to the pain you get when you walk into the wall.... git my drift.......
10 posted on
10/18/2004 8:20:11 AM PDT by
primatreat
(In the mind of the Kerry beholder is a empty cavern void of Cialis!!!!!)
To: qam1
its difficult to argue that theyre medically necessary Why is it so easy to dismiss someone else's sex life as not "medically necessary"?
I wonder what would the attitude would be if the author's sex life depended on Viagra?
For most of history amputees got along fine without prosthetic arms & legs, or with very primitive ones. Should Medicare only cover a single hook for a hand prosthesis?
To: qam1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson