Why is it so easy to dismiss someone else's sex life as not "medically necessary"?
I wonder what would the attitude would be if the author's sex life depended on Viagra?
For most of history amputees got along fine without prosthetic arms & legs, or with very primitive ones. Should Medicare only cover a single hook for a hand prosthesis?
Contrary to the line my high-school boyfriend tried on me...you will not DIE if you don't "get any."
Why stop there? How about free liposuction, Rhinoplasty, etc. for all medicare recipients? Having a big fat gut or big ugly snoze can make the possibility of healthly sex life beyond the ability for even Viagra to help.
If I going to pay for anyone to have sex, it's going to be for myself.