Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GEORGE SOROS: KERRY-DEMOCRAT PUPPETMASTER
IntellectualConservative.com ^ | 26 January 2004 | A.M. Siriano, Mia T

Posted on 10/17/2004 2:42:27 AM PDT by Mia T

 

GEORGE SOROS:
KERRY-DEMOCRAT PUPPETMASTER


We are the only site on the web devoted exclusively to intellectual conservatism. We find the most intriguing information and bring it together on one page for you.

Home
Articles
Headlines
Links we recommend
Feedback
Link to us
Free email update
About us
What's New & Interesting
Mailing Lists
Intellectual Icons
Submissions



 

The Dark Lord Soros
by A.M. Siriano
26 January 2004Open Society

What is embodied George Soros is the morphed spirit of the philosopher Karl Popper, who fostered and defined a politico-economic theory called Open Society.


 

Billionaire and ideologue George Soros, who came out of disembodied obscurity to popular recognition by vowing to unseat President Bush, is the sort of evil whose very presence should turn our stomachs.  As in the Lord of the Rings, in which Sauron begins to manifest himself as his power is threatened, Soros has come out of hiding in order to amass his armies to stop the spread of capitalism.

Okay, so Im engaging in a little hyperbole.  But I believe the analogy, with America as a type of Middle Earth, is fitting.  Soros has been around for some time and has never been, or hosted, a disembodied spiritas far as I know!  What is embodied in him is the morphed spirit of the philosopher Karl Popper, who fostered and defined a politico-economic theory called "Open Society."  Soros has been in the process of redefining that theory and believes his version to be as close to truth as one can get.

Soros adaptation of Open Society is easily recognized if one utters the words from which individualistic-minded people everywhere tend to recoil:  One-World Government.  You're not likely to hear that coming out of his sorry mouth; instead you'll hear this:  "It is easier to identify the enemies of the open society than to give the concept a positive meaning."  In a frightening piece from a February 1997 issue of The Atlantic Monthly, Soros spins his vision as best as he is able (and he is very able indeed--a moron does not a billionaire make):

We start with the recognition of our own fallibility, which extends not only to our mental constructs but also to our institutions. What is imperfect can be improved, by a process of trial and error. The open society not only allows this process but actually encourages it, by insisting on freedom of expression and protecting dissent. The open society offers a vista of limitless progress. In this respect it has an affinity with the scientific method. But science has at its disposal objective criteria--namely the facts by which the process may be judged. Unfortunately, in human affairs the facts do not provide reliable criteria of truth, yet we need some generally agreed-upon standards by which the process of trial and error can be judged. All cultures and religions offer such standards; the open society cannot do without them. The innovation in an open society is that whereas most cultures and religions regard their own values as absolute, an open society, which is aware of many cultures and religions, must regard its own shared values as a matter of debate and choice.

 

"Open" here is cunningly used as a synonym for "free," but we are not talking about freedom at all.  Freedom of thought is a good thing, says Soros, as long as it is in the context of this worldwide system he is proposing, and freedom of religion is a lovely idea if religion remains an innocuous presence only.  By Soros' own words, it is easy to discover how secularism and world order are inseparable ideals.  Contrast this to the Founders' belief that freedom of thought can only exist in the context of liberty.  Freedom of religion is encouraged, not quelled, and is certainly not divorced from the process of self-governance.  The government cannot impel religious thought, of course, but it should never try to stop it either.
 
Soros further reveals the anti-theistic nature of his Open Society in another alarming paragraph:

The Declaration of Independence may be taken as a pretty good approximation of the principles of an open society, but instead of claiming that those principles are self-evident, we ought to say that they are consistent with our fallibility. Could the recognition of our imperfect understanding serve to establish the open society as a desirable form of social organization? I believe it could, although there are formidable difficulties in the way. We must promote a belief in our own fallibility to the status that we normally confer on a belief in ultimate truth. But if ultimate truth is not attainable, how can we accept our fallibility as ultimate truth?

 

These may be the most audacious remarks I have ever read.  Some of the greatest words of liberty ever penned must now be revamped?  Read between the lines:  The Dark Lord Soros wants to throw God out of his proposed earthly paradise.  The core theme of the Declaration --

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 

-- cannot stand within an Open Society, because it is inherently spiritual.  "Self-evident" means that something is obvious within the soul to any rational human being.  We are still trying to actuate the remarkable thoughts of our Founders, and have gone through tribulation to get as far as we have got, but now the forces of Mordor (call them MoveOn.orc if you like) are on the rise.  The message is that we must embrace relativism, the contradictory notion that "nothing is true" is the only truth.  In Soros' words:  "[T]hat our understanding is imperfect & we must accept & as an article of faith."

Because I was a Cold War baby, raised in the Sixties and wary of the communist threat, I was happy and relieved to watch as President Reagan demolished the foundations of communism in the Eighties.  Since then, I have been perhaps too focused on the threat of its reemergence.  It is a very real threat, but I have neglected the stealthy rise of alternate paths to one-world government.  We must remember that utopian ideologies, which are all opposed to true individualism, are often at odds with each other.  Communism opposed Nazism during World War II, a fact that has fueled the false conclusion that one was far-left and the other far-right.  Both, in fact, arose from anti-theistic socialism, the core of leftist thought, and both were touted as paths to some type of utopian world order.

George Soros, adopting the anti-totalitarian view of Karl Popper, fought against both communism and Nazism.  Now, with no competing insidious opponents left, he turns his attention to a more subtle and dogged enemy, capitalism:

Although I have made a fortune in the financial markets, I now fear that the untrammeled intensification of laissez-faire capitalism and the spread of market values into all areas of life is endangering our open and democratic society. The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.

 

How convenient for him, to use capitalism for his own ends, and, once achieved, oppose similar opportunity for others!  But this is all very subversive.  Open Society is the latest version of the utopian dream, and this time it has a democratic face.  It is, in fact, the natural progression of the "progressive" party, which embraces democratic socialism, i.e., democracy within a socialistic framework.  This can only lead to global welfare and statist control, a system that is openly hostile to laissez-faire capitalism, to religious truth, and to any attempt to find freedom outside the boundaries of the state.  In such an environment, individualism is necessarily suspect; says Soros:

I contend that an open society may also be threatened from the opposite direction--from excessive individualism. Too much competition and too little cooperation can cause intolerable inequities and instability.

 

Are we seeing signs of this push toward one-world government today?  How about the gospel-like assumption that we must not act to defend our land except under the aegis of the U.N.?  How about the cries of foul against our refusal to accept the juris-impudence of the International Court?  How about Kyoto as a doctrine?  How about the anarchistic protests against open global trade?

George Soros views George Bush as the enemy, and there is some speculation that Soros is planning a financial coup to panic the market at election time.  This seems unlikely, but it all depends on how much hatred he has for Bush, a hatred that is largely a mystery to the tradition-loving people who live in Bush Country.  Conservatives everywhere disagree with Bush on many points, including the continued growth of the government, a trend in Congress that Bush has so far refused to curb, and his position on immigration, to name only two; but none of his weaknesses warrant the sort of hatred being spewed from the peaks of Mordor.  How can it be explained?

It is very simple, really.  George Bush, by his present role and his uncompromising ideals, embodies the self-evident truths that people like Soros despise:  capitalism, religious freedom, and the belief that the truth can be realized and acted upon--all mainstays of individualistic liberty.

The battle for Middle Earth is not yet upon us, folks, but let's not be fooled:  a storm is brewing.

A. M. Siriano is a DBA/web developer by day and writes for his own website, amsiriano.com, by night.

Email A.M. Siriano

Send this Article to a Friend




The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


POURQUOI JOHN KERRY EST DANGEREUX POUR L'AMÉRIQUE

by Mia T, 6.04.04

 


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


NEW! compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com

NEW! unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.

Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.

To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

George Soros

eorge Soros could not have more clearly enunciated the lethal danger that he and John Kerry and the clintons and the rest of his leftist cabal pose for America.

Yesterday, at the "progressive," i.e., ultra-extremist left-wing liberal, "Take Back America" confab, Mr. Soros confirmed the obvious: 9/11 was dispositive for the Dems; that is, 9/11 accelerated what eight years of the clintons had set into motion, namely, the demise of a Democratic party that is increasingly irrelevant, unflinchingly corrupt, unwaveringly self-serving, chronically moribund and above all, lethally, seditiously dangerous.

"All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Apparently missing the irony, George Soros chastised America with these words even as he was trying his $25,000,000, 527-end-run damnedest to render himself "more equal than others" in order to foist his radical, paranoic, deadly dementia on an entire nation.

"Animal Farm" is George Orwell's satirical allegory of the Russian Revolution; but it could just as easily be the story of the Democratic Party of today, with the

Kennedy-Pelosi-Gore-clinton (either--"one for the price of two," I say) -Sulzberger-Soros-Moore construct

its porcine manifestation.

SOROS TSURIS

Soros' little speech reveals everything we need to know about the Left, to wit:

  • its naivete about the War on Terror,

  • its preference for demagoguery over rational argument, and ideology and reacquisition of power over national security,

  • its mindset, which is inextricably bound to its failed, tortuous, reckless schemes, relics of a different time, a different war and a different enemy.

Soros is correct when he states that each of the two pillars of the Bush Doctine--the United States maintenance of absolute military superiority and the United States right of preemptive action--are "valid propositions" [in a post-9/11 world].

But when he proceeds from there to argue that the validity of each of these two [essential] pillars is somehow nullified by the resultant unequalled power that these two pillars, when taken together, vest in the United States, rational thought and national-security primacy give way to dogmatic Leftist neo-neoliberal ideology.

 

What is, in fact, "inviolate" here is the neo-neoliberal doctrine of U.S. sovereignty, which states simply that there must be none, that we must yield our sovereignty to the United Nations. Because this Leftist tenet is inviolate, and because it is the antithesis of the concept of U.S. sovereignty enunciated by the Bush Doctrine and the concept of U.S. sovereignty required by the War on Terror, rabid Leftists like Soros conclude that we must trash the latter two inconvenient concepts--even if critical to the survival of our country.

It is precisely here where Soros and the Left fail utterly to understand the War on Terror. They cannot see beyond their own ideology and lust for power. They have become a danger to this country no less lethal than the terrorists they aid and abet.

 

I think this administration has the right strategic vision and has taken many of the steps needed to get that long-term strategy rolling.

Where I give them the failing grade is in explaining that vision to the American public and the world. Key example: this White House enshrines preemptive war in the latest National Security Strategy and that scares the hell out of a lot of Americans, not to mention our allies. Why? This administration fails to distinguish sufficiently under what conditions that strategy makes reasonable sense.

My point is this: when you are explicit about the world being divided into globalization's Core and Gap, you can distinguish between the different security rule sets at work in each.

Nothing has changed about strategic deterrence or the concept of mutual-assured destruction (or MAD) within the Core, so fears about preemptive wars triggering World War III are misplaced.

When this administration talks about preemption, they're talking strictly about the Gap - not the Core. The strategic stability that defines the Core is not altered one whit by this new strategy, because preemption is all about striking first against actors or states you believe - quite reasonably - are undeterrable in the normal sense.

Thomas P.M. Barnett
The Pentagon's New Map
NB: Dr. Barnett is a lifelong DEMOCRAT

I'm a single-issue voter, as I guess must have become apparent.

I'm not a Republican. I'm not a conservative. I'm not a very great admirer of the president in many ways, but I think that my condition is... that this is an administration that wakes up every morning wondering how to make life hard for the forces of Jihad and how to make as hard as possible an unapologetic defense of civilization against this kind of barbarism... and though the Bush administration has been rife with disappointment on this and incompetent, I nonetheless feel that they have some sense of that spirit.

I don't get that... I don't get that feeling from anyone who even sought the Democratic nomination.

I would [therefore] have to vote for the reelection of President Bush.

Christopher Hitchens
Washington Journal, 6.01.04
C-SPAN


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004

 

MORE


 


election update!
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT~THE SERIES

NUISANCE' NUANCE: KERRY'S TERROR PROBLEM

SEVERAL SIMPLE ENDGAME SUGGESTIONS FOR PRESIDENT BUSH

DEBATE 3: JOHN KERRY OUTS JOHN KERRY
"THIS IS NOT A GOOD MAN"


YOU CAN TAKE THE BOY OUT OF AMBULANCE-CHASING
BUT YOU CAN'T TAKE AMBULANCE-CHASING OUT OF THE BOY

RAISING TAXES, YOU POOR SLOBS + TERESA'S 11.5% TAX RATE
(LAISSEZ-LES MANGER LE GÂTEAU)


THE LETHAL DANGER OF JOHN KERRY:
SPACE-TIME, TESSELLATIONS OF THE PLANET + TERRORISM

Kerry aims for 9/10, the good old days when terrorists were a "NUISANCE" and "not the focus of our lives"

Shadow War: The Untold Story of How Bush is Winning the War on Terror

DEBATE 2: Bush KOs Kerry
(The Lethal Danger of Kerry-Edwards + Old Media)

DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"

WHICH DANGEROUS MAN?

YOO-HOO! SECURITY MOMS:
THE TERRORISTS ARE TARGETING YOUR KIDS!

DEBATE ONE
NO GYP SHEET


Est-ce que je peux?
préemption et l'essai global

KERRY'S "GLOBAL TEST" FOR PREEMPTION:
WHY SECURITY MOMS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH


Diane Sawyer Nails Kerry Peril
PREEMPTION + KERRY'S EX POST FACTO REASONING

WINDSURFER WATERLOO
why the surfboard--not the snowboard--is (to mix war metaphors) Kerry's Achilles' heel

Windsurfing in the Persian Gulf

John "One Position on Iraq" Kerry's 1971 Replay

YOO-HOO DAN RATHER!
KERRY'S BELATED "HONORABLE" DISCHARGE:
Is a less-than-honorable discharge and clinton "pardon" behind Kerry's refusal to sign form 180 to release ALL of his records?

RATHERGATE IS ANOTHER WATERGATE: The Nexus

CARL BERNSTEIN: RATHERGATE MAY BE ANOTHER WATERGATE

CLUELESS: O'REILLY AND PODHORETZ ON RATHERGATE

THE KERRY-RATHER-BARNES FORGERIES DECONSTRUCTED

HEAR THE FIRST VEEP DEBATE NOW! (the whole ball of wax)
CHENEY WARNS AMERICA: THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT OUR SURVIVAL
KERRY-EDWARDS TRIES TO SHUT DOWN DEBATE

KERRY'S VIETNAM FIXATION
PART 1: advice from bill

Kerry's new W offensive

YOO-HOO! UNDECIDEDS + "PERSUADABLES"
HEAR THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY DOESN'T WANT YOU TO HEAR

(WHY INFORMED, RATIONAL DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH)

DECONSTRUCTING ZELL MILLER

EXPLOITING MAX CLELAND

Kerry is UNFIT #21: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
BOARDHEAD TO THE RESCUE


The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


Kerry is UNFIT #20: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
PREEMPTION-
(the whole ball of wax)

CONTEMPLATING KERRY'S "GUT"

A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT
...BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?


getting kerry's goat
john kerry lacks presidential temperament

Two Psychologists on Kerry: Dangerous on National Security

YOO-HOO! followthemoney.org. . .
OVER HERE!

"bombastic ass" is not the antidote to "boorish ass"
(or why Keith Olbermann Cannot Do Cleanup for Chris Matthews)

UNFIT #19:
JOHN KERRY'S "MORE SENSITIVE WAR ON TERROR"

THE COMPLEAT JOHN KERRY
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

Kerry, NOT Bush, paralyzed by 9/11 attacks
Hear Kerry admit he could not think

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
KERRY-DEMOCRAT CONTEMPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY[annotated]


THE DEMOCRATS-ARE-GONNA-GET-US-KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES1

dox in sox on lummox in box on fox

THE REAL "REAL DEAL"
(what Kerry's commanders and crewmates REALLY think of him--with transcripts)

Did John Kerry pick a running mate or hire a lawyer when he selected John Edwards?

THE MAN FROM HOPE: been there, done that

"Hope is on the way!" (the scoop)

THE TERRORISTS' USEFUL IDIOTS
all the usual suspects


A Vote for Kerry is a Vote for the Terrorists

ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES: 8/10/04 UPDATE!
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief


JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief


UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO


UNFIT #6: The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?


UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#1-making the tough choices in a post-9/11 world
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#2-understanding the job description

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#3-sang-froid and the "nuclear" button

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#4 - Kerry champions tolerance for terrorists


sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation


"Loose Cannon" Kerry's AWOL/PURPLE-HEART FRAUD

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic

USEFUL IDIOTS

MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE

The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL


JOHN KERRY'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


bill clinton, boy "genius," unwittingly bares all on BBC

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

vetting missus clinton...

The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick

nepotism + tokenism = a nancy pelosi
(or a hillary clinton)

Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process
Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?


DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EARS (The Perjurer Returns)
(Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull')

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance


What is the REAL Reason for Gorelick's Wall?

giant sucking sound
KERRY MAKES DUKAKIS LOOK CONSERVATIVE, SMART + JUDICIOUS


Q ERTY6 utter failureBUMP

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism


MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

 

MORE

 


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Colorado; US: Florida; US: Illinois; US: Iowa; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: Missouri; US: Nevada; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New Mexico; US: New York; US: North Carolina; US: Ohio; US: Oregon; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Dakota; US: Texas; US: Washington; US: West Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 527s; bushdoctrine; clinton; georgesoros; karlpopper; moveonorg; napalminthemorning; oneworldgovernment; opensociety; preemption; preventivewar; soros; tyranny; tyrant; un; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2004 2:42:28 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; jla; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


2 posted on 10/17/2004 2:46:03 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Just a little more on the dangerous nutball:

Between 1994 and 2000, Soros' contributions to his foundations, the 'Open Society' and others, amounted... "to more than $2.5 billion, growing from $300 million to $574.7 million in 1998 and some $570 million in 1999" one expert concluded: "Not since (John D.) Rockefeller and Carnegie has such a force been seen in that field of donorship."

...................

Soros loves Oxford University. He loves the European culture and he never really did Americanize himself.

...............

Soros' turning point was the year of 1973: he became an independent company with 17 million dollars (Soros Fund Management). After six years, he made $100 million. Then he established his 'Soros Quantum Fund'. In 1998, the value of quantum was $6 billion! ................

Now, with all his loot and Mesianic delusions, he is a danger to America.

3 posted on 10/17/2004 2:59:04 AM PDT by beyond the sea (ab9usa4uandme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

More on George Soros:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527indivsdetail.asp?ID=11001147458&Cycle=2004

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0928-16.htm


4 posted on 10/17/2004 3:01:55 AM PDT by The Loan Arranger (At least Jane Fonda "apologized".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Big Bucks for socialism.....George....go screw yourself!!


5 posted on 10/17/2004 3:17:29 AM PDT by Stateline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

One of George Soro's heros

http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-gram.htm

Antonio Gramsci (1891 - 1937) was a leading Italian Marxist. He was an intellectual, a journalist and a major theorist who spent his last eleven years in Mussolini’s prisons. During this time, he completed 32 notebooks containing almost 3,000 pages. These notebooks were smuggled out from his prison and published in Italian after the war but did not find an English-language publisher until the 1970s. The central and guiding theme of the Notebooks was the development of a new Marxist theory applicable to the conditions of advanced capitalism.


6 posted on 10/17/2004 3:22:42 AM PDT by listenhillary (We are defending the peace by taking the fight to the enemy.GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

How old is Soros. How is his health? Does anybody know. Hopefully God will take care of him.


7 posted on 10/17/2004 3:25:26 AM PDT by Bellflower (A new day is coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

It seems to me, that much like child and spouse abusers, who are often victims of that abuse, Soros, who was a victim of totalitarian governments wants to set himself up as a totalitarian leader.

One of the other "crazy" things about leftists, is that even though their policies fail, often with huge costs in property and lives, they always come back to the theory that "it just wasn't implemented correctly." Funny how the last set of leaders just couldn't get it right. But if they have one more chance, they COULD get it right! And of course, THEY'RE THE ONES who could get it right!

Mark


8 posted on 10/17/2004 3:35:28 AM PDT by MarkL (Power currupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

b. 12 Aug 1930


9 posted on 10/17/2004 3:42:30 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
clinton Mulligansbump

Soros, née Schwartz, a Hungarian Jew, was first threatened by the Nazis and then by the communists.

10 posted on 10/17/2004 4:02:48 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Great post. Thank you.


11 posted on 10/17/2004 4:15:52 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Don't fly JETBLUE AIRWAYS!!! George Soros is the largest stockholder in that airline. If you fly JETBLUE, you are contributing to the George Soros fortune! The company should be called SOROS AIRLINES!
12 posted on 10/17/2004 4:18:50 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
How corrupt is Soros-controlled ABC?

Halperin Memo Dated Friday October 8, 2004

"It goes without saying that the stakes are getting very high
for the country and the campaigns - and our responsibilities become quite grave
I do not want to set off (sp?) and endless colloquy that none of us have time for today
- nor do I want to stifle one.
Please respond if you feel you can advance the discussion.
The New York Times (Nagourney/Stevenson) and Howard Fineman
on the web both make the same point today: the current Bush attacks
on Kerry involve distortions and taking things out of context in a way
that goes beyond what Kerry has done.
Kerry distorts, takes out of context, and mistakes all the time, but these are not central to his (ed. ABC-supported) efforts to win.
We have a responsibility to hold both sides accountable to the public interest,
but that doesn't mean we reflexively and artificially hold both sides
"equally" accountable when the facts don't warrant that.
I'm sure many of you have this week felt the stepped up Bush efforts
to complain about our coverage.
This is all part of their efforts to get away with as
much as possible with the stepped up, renewed efforts
to win the election by destroying Senator Kerry at least partly through distortions.

It's up to Kerry to defend himself, of course.
But as one of the few news organizations with the skill and strength to help voters evaluate what the
candidates are saying to serve the public interest.
Now is the time for all of us to step up and do that right. "




And who is Halperin?

BREAKING:
Halperin's father is none other than Morton H. Halperin,
head of George Soros' Open Society Policy Center.

13 posted on 10/17/2004 4:21:58 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that George Soros is easily one of the most evil men on the planet(if not the most evil man on the planet).
Psychopaths like Bin Laden and Al Quaeda we know exactly where they are coming from, and George Bush is busy right now systematically wiping out the Al Quaeda abomination from the face of the earth, with up to 65% of these vermin and their leaders either liquidated or captured so far, and the rest of these creatures marked for a swift passage to go meet Allah, like they claim to want to.
Diabolical, truly evil, virulently destructive forces like George Soros are a different matter altogether.
Officially he is supposedly an "American philanthropist" even though he never accepted Americans as his equal and has devoted his entire life to destroying America, after making Billions of dollars in this country when forced to flee Soviet oppression in his Eastern European homeland.
As far as Soros is concerned the only people that matter are Europeans, anyone else has to be made to kowtow to the "superior" European arrogance.
Thus it was that Soros was the diabolical mastermind behind the collapse of the Asian economies a few years back. The master puppeteer who pulled strings in the financial markets to try and bring the Asian economies to their knees.
Why? Because the Asians dared to grow from third world to nearly first world status economically in relatively short period of time, while Eastern Europe languished.
In the same vein, Soros has been singular in using every sinew in his body to try to smash America's Boeing Aircraft company,while going flat out to prop up the massively government subsidized mostly French based European Airbus entity. Soros even financed JETBLUE, in his ongoing attempts to sabotage Boeing. Freepers will note that SOROS was one of the biggest investors in JETBLUE, his main condition being that JETBLUE uses ONLY European AIRBUS planes, with no Boeing planes whatsoever, which they meekly agreed to do.
Soros used huge amounts of money to fight for this laughably ineffective "campaign finance reforms", which ostensibly "banned" soft money, only for Soros himself to turn round and spend VAST amounts of soft money in his 527's in a doomed attempt to defeat president Bush.
Was there ever a bigger hypocrite on this planet than George Soros?
We haven't even talked about George Soros's attempts insane attempts to hook American children on drugs with his financing of every far out "decriminalize drugs" group in this country while backing the pro-drugs side in every drug referendum in the states where it was put on the ballot.
I think anti-Soros grassroots organizations throughout these United States should start coming together with the sole purpose of defeating the evil machinations of the evil Soros monster before and especially AFTER the elections when Kerry has been soundly beaten.
America has never been for sale to American-haters from Eastern Europe or anywhere else. That is a message that should be brought home forcefully to George Soros.

AS AN ASIDE
I have always maintained that all patriotic, clear thinking Americans have simply no business patronizing Jetblue and helping to bring about the collapse of commercial aircraft business in America, while subsidizing jobs for the hated French.
Why use the European Airbus using Jetblue, when you can use AIRTRAN which uses solidly American Boeing aircraft exclusively, and is nearly always much cheaper than Jetblue anyway?
14 posted on 10/17/2004 4:38:20 AM PDT by KwasiOwusu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Halperin-memo bump

Rather stupid of ABC News to have put this stunted, radicalized robot up front.

15 posted on 10/17/2004 4:43:46 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KwasiOwusu

bump


16 posted on 10/17/2004 4:46:46 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I'm confused about why your compilations are being categorized on the state-interest topics. It makes it much more difficult to find local news discussions quickly.

Thanks for your consideration.


17 posted on 10/17/2004 5:32:33 AM PDT by Tax-chick ( The old woman who lives in the 15-passenger van.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

If Bush were supported by a shady billionaire with fringe lunatic ideas who was pouring millions into the campaign, it would be a DAILY SCANDAL. The story of this highly questionable money source would DWARF ALL OTHER ASPECTS of the election. Libs would be howling from the rafters about the TAKEOVER OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY.

As it is now-- "George is buying the election for kerry? What's the problem?"


18 posted on 10/17/2004 5:57:32 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Travis McGee

"It is very simple, really. George Bush, by his present role and his uncompromising ideals, embodies the self-evident truths that people like Soros despise: capitalism, religious freedom, and the belief that the truth can be realized and acted upon--all mainstays of individualistic liberty."

"The battle for Middle Earth is not yet upon us, folks, but let's not be fooled: a storm is brewing."

Mia the author is "right on" in his first paragraph.

However, he is wrong in his second path. We are in the Cold War Phase of Civil War II. If the left wins this election, we can kiss America, our Families and Friends goodbye.


19 posted on 10/17/2004 6:11:58 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger; All
More on George Soros:

20 posted on 10/17/2004 6:58:16 AM PDT by olde north church (Is it un-Christian of me to wish Dem Strategist Rich Masters choke to death on rooster sandwich?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson