DRUDGE SIREN: KERRY/EDWARDS ELECTION DIRECTIVE: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS!

Drudge ^ | 10/14/04 | Drudge

[Pete]

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 14, 2004 10:58:04 ET XXXXX

DNC ELECTION MANUAL: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS

**World Exclusive**

The Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee are advising election operatives to declare voter intimidation -- even if none exists, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.

A 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee states: "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"

[HIGHLIGHT OF ELECTION DAY MANUAL, NOVEMBER 2004. CLICK FOR IMAGE .JPG FILE]

The provocative Dem battle plan is to be distributed in dozens of states, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

One top DNC official confirmed the manual's authenticity, but claimed the notion of crying wolf on any voter intimidation is "absurd."

"We all know the Republicans are going to try to steal the election by scaring people and confusing people," the top DNC source explained.

Developing...

[Charles Martel]

This is it. This is how it starts. This election is going to be a war.

That may indeed be so. There is historical precedent, and right here in the U.S. of A. The Missouri-Kansas Border War began primarily because abolitionists in the northeast began sending "settlers" into the region to commit voter fraud. "Bleeding Kansas" was a pretext to the Civil War, if not its actual beginning.

However, most people haven't the slightest clue as to where this sort of stuff can lead. Consequently, we are straying perilously close to the "reset button".

[QQQQQ]

DNC Authenticates Drudge's Document

DNC posts the full page and it says exactly what Drudge posted.

[Thrusher]

I did not necessarily mean an armed conflict when I said "war," although I would not rule out some of the WTO-type "protests" we have seen in the past. I just meant that I think the libs are vehemently energized to win this election, with the required votes or without, and the conservatives know that the world is too dangerous to let John Kerry be president.

Libs will be fighting for their "religion," while conservatives will be fighting for the safety of their children and their children's children.

[pctech]

Not surprised in the least. Typical behavior from the radical left and their desire to win no matter the costs, even if it means causing widespread pessimism across this once great country.

[ArmedNReady]

Bump

We must call and write our legislators and DEMAND that this be brought to the attention of the entire American public. Bush needs to make a special address to the American people on this one.

[Mr.Atos]

Bump!

[MESHUGAMIKEY]

PHONE CALLS to all the MEDIA OUTLETS

if they dont act,,,,,WE MUST TAKE THIS TO A PROTEST

[Salvation]

Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

In Oregon, Sec. of State Bradbury (the one who banished Nader signatures) goofed and did not include the Vice Presidential nominees on the voters' plamplet. OOPS!

[Mr.Atos]

Thank you, Salvation! I'm going to try to blog on this tonight, especially as it relates to today's related Oregon story.

The Morlocks are hard at work doing what they do best.

[LayoutGuru2]

Sweet :P)

[tazannie]

I really think we should push Ashcroft to make a very strong statement about this (I'm sure it must be a federal crime, right?)

that might scare off some, but certainly not all.

[dandiegirl]

Wouldn't this be the perfect evidence for the Republican lawyers to show to the judge that has to settle this mess if we get into all that recount garbage?

[cspackler]

I have to agree with you. I always read these things for the first time as if thy were written by our side to temper my reaction. In my opinion, they aren't suggesting to do anything that I wouldn't expect the RNC to do if they suspected that fraud was occurring. They never say to actually claim fraud, just bring the subject to light. As far as the newspaper thing, they are simply saying to have them disregard ANY inaccurate advertising, not just opposing stuff.

I'd really like to see some meat here, but, while a little sleazy, it seems fairly innocuous to me.

[Victoria Delsoul]

This is what Democrats are good for. Their preemptive strikes are against law-abiding Republicans, and not against the terrorists.

[Scenic Sounds]

but what our side should be doing is - CHARGE DEM VOTER FRAUD. because in most cases, it DOES exist.

"It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes." - Joseph Stalin.

At least that's what they've said he said. ;-)

[GOPJ]

bump

[ladyinred]

These scum intend to subvert the constitution. A bloodless coup is occuring before our very eyes.

[Free Vulcan]

Yup, with elements of fraud, libel, slander, intimidation, blackmail, extortion, racketeering, and other mafia type activities, not to mention disenfranchising legitimate voters. If they accuse us, we need to throw it right back at 'em.

[BigSkyFreeper]

This is old playbook stuff straight from the tattered pages of the Democrat playbook.

[BigSkyFreeper]

This is what Democrats are good for.

When the Democrats can't win fairly and squarely, they lie and cheat.