Posted on 10/13/2004 8:28:10 PM PDT by Jose Roberto
Tonight, President George W. Bush knocked out Liberal Democratic Senator by the end of the first half hour. Being objective, I was concerned tonight about Kerry's so-called mastery in domestic issues. But it would make sense that Bush, a former Governor of one of the largest US states would feel more comfortable in domestic issues than Kerry, who has spent 20 years in the Senate suffering from diarrhea of the mouth without accomplishing anything. I could not believe that Bush was cleaning Kerry's clock so convincingly that even the MSM was left without words. There we saw Chris Matthews screaming and trying to convince his panel (Reagan, Mitchell, Meathan,and Buchanan) that Kerry did "OK" and saying that Bush was "subdued". Over at the Communist News Network (CNN) Blitzer and Greenfield as well as Carlos Watson were giving the debate to Kerry but wondering if it made a difference in the polls. However, Fox News declared a total demolition of Kerry by Bush. Krystol was ebullient and happy, Kondrake was righteous saying that Kerry's outing of Cheney's daughter as a lesbian was a "low blow" and Barnes was ecstatic that Bush saved the best for last. Clearly, Fox News was seen by a wider audience and their veredict carries more weight, but be sure that the MSM is in panic as Bush enters the final phase of the campaign with the upper hand. Congratulations to our heroic President, now on to the campaign to put the Liberal necklace on Kerry and to make him wear it proudly. Liberal liberal liberal.
Maybe Stuart Smalley will write a new book entitled "Liberal liberals, and the liberal liberal liberals who liberalize them"
I believe he said that he authored 56 bills and co-signed others.
My question to Mr. Kerry is: "What does the passage of 56 bills in 20 years (an average of 2.8 per year) say about your influence in the senate?"
I have to wonder what you were watching this evening. On what issue did Kerry excel? He was inarticulate and long-winded. Bush hit hard and fast and was on top of every issue, usually with facts and statistics at the ready.
Kerry, on the other hand, was inaccurate and defensive. Also, the polls are UNSCIENTIFIC according to every one I have seen. If you can name one topic on which Kerry "creamed" Bush, please enlighten me.
I emailed CNN and told them what I thought of their bias crap, but it will matter not to them.
57?!!!
Every single link on CNN's website(s) for 'contacting CNN' pops up, 'this link is down.'
Any activism must be done from America to CNN in Atlanta IMO
I have to agree. I am voting for Bush also and think Bush will win, needs to win for our nation's sake. But I don't understand how this deluding ourselves changes anything. Gallup puts Kerry's win tonight almost as large as Kerry's win in the first debate.
K B Neither Tied No Opinion
3RD :52 39 1 8 *
2ND :47 45 1 7 *
1ST :53 37 1 8 1
If we want to help Bush win this thing, we need to stop being ostriches and get our heads out of the sand.
Yes, and Alan Colmes definitely looked like he picked a bad day to quit sniffing glue!
Source link??
You want to sleep at night, forget them. They are lost causes, and will be that way forever. The problem they have is that they complain about everything, rather than looking in the mirror and realizing most of their personal destiny is in their own hands. Like John Kerry, they live in La-La Land, bitching and whining all the time. Vote for GW Bush on election day. These people are like communists, they want someone else's money for nothing.
Of course it is not too late. I was voting for Bush before the first second and third debates. Nothing changed it for me. People voting for low life kerry will be doing the same. As for the undecideds...dont' think they know what they are doing anyway. If they haven't made up their minds by now...they are lost anyway.
Debates were important before the internet. Now they are just tradition in my mind. Debates were the one way you could see both candidates and then you were fed what the MSM wanted you to hear. Oh no folks. Debates will be going the way of the MSM too since cable knocked them on their butts.
We've got the internet and our networkubg and can think for ourselves so NOTHING and I mean NOTHING can stop the public from communicating on our own.
Thanks to Al Gore...we have the internet. :)
Bush/Cheney 2004
Alan's hopeless.
I knew Alan was hopeless when he cited Reagan's taxcuts as being responsible for the deficit and rolling his eyes years ago.
Nary a word about Tip O'Neill's spend, spend, spend....
Now, he just claims the Bush people are lying about John Kerry with no specifics. I want to know the details,
not the Kerryesque "I have a plan" statemsnts that "The Republican are lying" without the details.
You keep posting the same thing in different threads.
hmmmmm
ROFL! Online polls, huh? That's desperation.
In my carpool they were tuned in to the local CBS affiliate/all news radio station. Again and again they declared that "instant CBS polls show Kerry the winner, but some declare it a draw." I figured that if CBS declares it somewhere between a draw and a win for Kerry, then Bush must have done quite well!
"NIN" is Nine Inch Nails?
BTW - That lyric is from Tom Petty, not Johnny Cash.
Johnny Cash made a recording of it shortly before his death that is particularly powerful, probably because he was in mourning over the death of his wife June Carter Cash.
I had forgotten about Tom Petty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.