Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

October Surprise??? Navy Chief (from SBVT site)
SwiftVets.com ^

Posted on 10/12/2004 10:14:15 PM PDT by tazannie

I hope this is good


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courtmarshal; courtmartial; dishonorabldischarge; kerrydischarge; kerrylies; lessthanhonorable; swiftboat; swiftboatvets; swiftvets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 681-683 next last
To: blondee123

I didn't send it. I hope someone will though. I never seem to get it to the right address.


441 posted on 10/13/2004 1:52:56 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

LOL! I was pinging you!!! :) Best reason in the world to get up! :)


442 posted on 10/13/2004 1:53:46 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

... near veto proof majority in the senate and mucho blowback for the Klintons.


&&&
Whoa, there, don't get so excited. My heart skips a beat contemplating both possibilities, but I am not getting my hopes up. We have gotten opptimistic too many times only to be disappointed.


443 posted on 10/13/2004 1:54:10 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
What is John Kerry hiding? Why doesn't he sign the Standard Form 180 and release his military service and medical records to the public?

Join the petition.

http://www.SignForm180.com

444 posted on 10/13/2004 1:54:33 AM PDT by Beckwith (John Kerry, sign the Form 180 - petition at http://www.SignForm180.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY

Only the massed weight of public opinion could get to those records, and I'm sure that Mr. Kerry won't be signing an SF-180 only 3 weeks from the election.

He knows he can ride out a controversy like this, and that his anti-war liberal left base wouldn't care anyway. After all, we'd hear that "it was 35 years ago, who cares?" from them, wouldn't we?

Like I said, one needs to look at the pertinent sections of the United States Code under which Mr. Kerry's final discharge was adjudicated to gain a hint of just why it wasn't until 1978 that the matter was addressed.

Technically, the statute of limitations for action on a BCNR review is 36 months from the end of creditable service. The Board will entertain requests for review of records beyond that under exceptional circumstances. I'm sure that he had friends enough already, and the Carter amnesty in hand, to ensure action by the BCNR.


445 posted on 10/13/2004 1:55:10 AM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA

I sent it - used the contact the show link on hannity.com.


446 posted on 10/13/2004 1:56:03 AM PDT by DaveMSmith (One Day at A Time || Blue Angel in PJs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

Thanks re Hannity! I wonder if the DU has the news yet! LOL.


447 posted on 10/13/2004 1:56:08 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

I wonder if that is the good one. I sent it to Bill Bennett and Laura Ingraham.


448 posted on 10/13/2004 1:58:42 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY

He had to have also signed a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Records, in order to be eligible for review. If he was successful, and it looks like he was, then that Form, along with all other records of the proceeding, is sealed.

Start from now and try to follow a paper trail backwards. Microfiche was the common storage method back then for these records, so there may not even be any actual physical documents left to get at.


449 posted on 10/13/2004 1:59:39 AM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna

Hence the.. "He can run, but he can't hide" line.


450 posted on 10/13/2004 2:00:11 AM PDT by 80skid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: tazannie

5:00 AM. One hour to go. Haven't had my coffee yet, but I don't think the world has ended so far. NY Sun doesn't look surprising either. Something about a Presidential debate, but I'm pretty sure that was already public knowledge. Coffee's almost ready.


451 posted on 10/13/2004 2:00:11 AM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA

Just went over there and didn't see anything...

P.S. - I need to take a hot shower now...


452 posted on 10/13/2004 2:01:23 AM PDT by PowerPro (Still Praying America Wakes Up In Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA

Also sent to comments@sbgi.net - that's Sinclair Broadcasting


453 posted on 10/13/2004 2:02:50 AM PDT by DaveMSmith (One Day at A Time || Blue Angel in PJs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: 80skid

One would hope that that was what the President meant. The government is sloppy sometimes, and I'm sure something exists out there. For the Sun to make such a speculation, without some concrete document or corroborating witness who sat on the Board or was a recorder for the Board, or something, just doesn't make sense.

They've got more than they're releasing right at this moment. And I'm sure Karl Rove knows exactly what they've got.


454 posted on 10/13/2004 2:02:53 AM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna; All

if you can get into the Navy BYPERS you might look at the citation on his discharge, BUPERS 3830300

http://www.bupers.navy.mil/


These below were executive orders by
Carter after the draft dodger pardons..

Executive Order 12017
Amending the Code of Conduct for Members of the Armed Forces of the United States

Signed: November 3, 1977
Federal Register page and date: 42 FR 57941; November 7, 1977
Amends: EO 10631, August 17, 1955






Executive Order 12018
Amending the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised Edition)

Signed: November 3, 1977
Federal Register page and date: 42 FR 57943; November 7, 1977
Amends: EO 11476, June 19, 1969 (which was rescinded by EO 12473, April 13, 1984)
See: EO 12198, March 12, 1980


455 posted on 10/13/2004 2:03:22 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna

Here's 10 U.S.C.S. 1162 and 1163.. Both have since been repealed in 1994. Note 1163.

§ 1162. Reserves; discharge

(a) Subject to other provisions of this title [10 USCS §§ 101 et seq.], reserve commissioned officers may be discharged at the pleasure of the President. Other Reserves may be discharged under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned.

(b) Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, a Reserve who becomes a regular or ordained minister of religion is entitled upon his request to a discharge from his reserve enlistment or appointment.


10 USCS § 1163 (1992)

§ 1163. Reserve components: members; limitations on separation

(a) An officer of a reserve component who has at least three years of service as a commissioned officer may not be separated from that component without his consent except under an approved recommendation of a board of officers convened by an authority designated by the Secretary concerned, or by the approved sentence of a court-martial. This subsection does not apply to a separation under subsection (b) of this section or under section 1003 of this title [10 USCS § 1003], to a dismissal under section 1161 (a) of this title [10 USCS § 1161(a)], or to a transfer under section 3352 or 8352 of this title [10 USCS § 3352 or 8352].

(b) The President or the Secretary concerned may drop from the rolls of the armed force concerned any Reserve (1) who has been absent without authority for at least three months, or (2) who is sentenced to confinement in a Federal or State penitentiary or correctional institution after having been found guilty of an offense by a court other than a court-martial or other military court, and whose sentence has become final.

(c) A member of a reserve component who is separated therefrom for cause, except under subsection (b), is entitled to a discharge under honorable conditions unless--

(1) he is discharged under conditions other than honorable under an approved sentence of a court-martial or under the approved findings of a board of officers convened by an authority designated by the Secretary concerned; or

(2) he consents to a discharge under conditions other than honorable with a waiver of proceedings of a court-martial or a board.

(d) Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned, which shall be as uniform as practicable, a member of a reserve component who is on active duty (other than for training) and is within two years of becoming eligible for retired pay or retainer pay under a purely military retirement system, may not be involuntarily released from that duty before he becomes eligible for that pay, unless his release is approved by the Secretary.


456 posted on 10/13/2004 2:05:10 AM PDT by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: PowerPro

:)


457 posted on 10/13/2004 2:06:17 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

Good thinking! I am sure they will enjoy it.


458 posted on 10/13/2004 2:06:52 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
5:00 AM. One hour to go. Haven't had my coffee yet...

Wow, morning coffee sounds good but first I have to get to bed so I can wake up to it in about 4 hours.

459 posted on 10/13/2004 2:09:44 AM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Sleep tight.


460 posted on 10/13/2004 2:11:07 AM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 681-683 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson