The Shadow Party (Must read: George Soros' Growing Web of SUBVERSION)

FrontPageMag ^ | October 6, 2004 | David Horowitz and Richard Poe

[MereChristian]

I have often wondered what motivates George Soros' intense hatred of the United States, and by extension, the rest of the civilised world. After reading the series above, I came away with a much better understanding of the dangerous game Soros is playing. Most people are at least dimly aware that George Soros is the string-puller behind a number of subversive front groups. Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?

[SunnySide]

"George Soros is the string-puller behind a number of subversive front groups. Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?"

Probably. Most men like a Soros are front men for many men.

[Lucy Lake]

Soros ping.

[Viet-Boat-Rider]

Let the Revolution begin.

[MereChristian]

"Soros offered no coherent solution to the problem. He simply continued his long-established pattern of pouring money into a hodge-podge of fashionable leftwing causes, such as promoting mass immigration into the United States; financing anti-gun lawsuits and lobbyists; demanding voting rights for felons; seeking the abolition of capital punishment; exacerbating Palestinian unrest; promoting abortion; feminism; population control; gay liberation; euthanasia; radical theories of education; marijuana legalization and global government."

It's as if George Soros is the embodiment of just about every evil special interest out there.

[Dat Mon]

"Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?"

People at Soros level aren't controlled. However, I believe there are a number of 'marriages of convenience'. For that, you'd have to look globally at not only individuals, but governments, and who would gain or lose should the US fall.

The question is whether Sors et al intend to establish socialism, as we term it, or rather, a "third way" global government which would be, in my opining, a modern day version of a feudal society.

Look at the modern day third way feudal societies....two immediately come to mind... Saudi Arabia, and China.

China, IMHO, is neither strictly capitalistic, (or striving to be) or communistic, but rather feudalistic / fascistic.

So, if I was looking long term at Soros' 'partners', perhaps I would look to the Middle East, and China.

[Bogolyubski]

This is a tremendous series of articles from David Horowitz and Richard Poe. A great thanks to both for their hard work and excellent reportage. (I think Richard Poe actually posts items here once in a while.)

If you want to find out about Soros - and how he is poisoning our nation, this series of 3 articles gives an excellent overview. The one area where we need more info is on Soros' connection and influence over the stick market, the futures markets (especially crude oil), etc. Soros owns several members of Congress - Feingold, McCain, and others. He a very dangerous individual. The more his activities are exposed to the light of day, the less potential for harm.

[1066AD]

Only his outrage over Bush’s invasion of Iraq had stirred him to get involved in the partisan struggle.

Oh ? Maybe he's a beneficiary of Saddam's kickbacks. Not that he needs the money but the power and ego is everything.

[MereChristian]

"So, if I was looking long term at Soros' 'partners', perhaps I would look to the Middle East, and China."

Are you saying Soros is deliberately trying to weaken our Republic to facilitate our slide into a governmental system such as China's? In other words, are you saying George Soros preaches the "Open Society" in order to bring about a closed one?

[Dat Mon]

Soros is a totally corrupt sociopath, liar, and obsessive atheist. Other than that he's a swell guy!

[MereChristian]

"Oh ? Maybe he's a beneficiary of Saddam's kickbacks."

Wouldn't surprise me a bit, if true. But I hardly think that's why he got involved in "partisan politics." The die was cast long before the Gulf War.

[Entrepreneur]

Top Four Shadow Party Contributions to Democrat 527s Contributors (August 2000 – August 2004)

--------------------------------------------------------

Peter B. Lewis $14,375,000.00

George and Susan W. Soros $13,120,000.00

Jane Fonda $13,085,750.00

Stephen L. Bing $9,869,014.00

Courtesy The Center for Public Integrity

Okay, 3 points...

1. How many people know how much Hanoi Jane has given to the Democrat front groups? How many people know that she's given as much as Soros to support Kerry's election? How many vets know this?

2. Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance has just ensured that I will NEVER spend a dime with his company. I understand why it's behind the scenes because it's bad business. I don't want to buy his products knowing that some of it goes to fund his causes, which I disagree with.

3. Who the heck is Stephen Bing?

[Christian4Bush]

bttt

[Lucy Lake]

Google Stephen Bing.

[Texas_Jarhead]

Good article. Thanks for posting all three sections.

[Fedora]

See discussion of this article here:

The Shadow Party: Part I

The Shadow Party: Part II

[MereChristian]

"1. How many people know how much Hanoi Jane has given to the Democrat front groups?"

Poe and Horowitz is as good a place to start as any. Apparently her appology for her anti-Vietnam activities didn't mean all that much. It would also appear that her "conversion" to Christianity didn't take hold. It will be difficult, but I am going to pray for her tonight.

[MereChristian]

Sorry if I split your discussion, Fedora.

[Fedora]

No need to apologize!--it's an important article and if more people read it because of your post that's good. As a general rule, though, before you post an article it's advisable to do a search to see if there's already a thread on it.

[MereChristian]

Thanks for the advice. Still learning my way around.