Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I have often wondered what motivates George Soros' intense hatred of the United States, and by extension, the rest of the civilised world. After reading the series above, I came away with a much better understanding of the dangerous game Soros is playing. Most people are at least dimly aware that George Soros is the string-puller behind a number of subversive front groups. Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?
1 posted on 10/11/2004 8:30:33 PM PDT by MereChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MereChristian

"George Soros is the string-puller behind a number of subversive front groups. Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?"

Probably. Most men like a Soros are front men for many men.


2 posted on 10/11/2004 8:34:51 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lothor; onyx eyes; Rome2000; zeugma; EagleUSA; coffee260; nikos1121; Bogolyubski; jer33 3; ...

Soros ping.


3 posted on 10/11/2004 8:43:51 PM PDT by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian
"Here's a question to ponder...Are there any strings that control George Soros?"

People at Soros level aren't controlled. However, I believe there are a number of 'marriages of convenience'. For that, you'd have to look globally at not only individuals, but governments, and who would gain or lose should the US fall.

The question is whether Sors et al intend to establish socialism, as we term it, or rather, a "third way" global government which would be, in my opining, a modern day version of a feudal society.

Look at the modern day third way feudal societies....two immediately come to mind... Saudi Arabia, and China.

China, IMHO, is neither strictly capitalistic, (or striving to be) or communistic, but rather feudalistic / fascistic.

So, if I was looking long term at Soros' 'partners', perhaps I would look to the Middle East, and China.
6 posted on 10/11/2004 8:51:02 PM PDT by Dat Mon (clever tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

This is a tremendous series of articles from David Horowitz and Richard Poe. A great thanks to both for their hard work and excellent reportage. (I think Richard Poe actually posts items here once in a while.)

If you want to find out about Soros - and how he is poisoning our nation, this series of 3 articles gives an excellent overview. The one area where we need more info is on Soros' connection and influence over the stick market, the futures markets (especially crude oil), etc. Soros owns several members of Congress - Feingold, McCain, and others. He a very dangerous individual. The more his activities are exposed to the light of day, the less potential for harm.


7 posted on 10/11/2004 8:51:11 PM PDT by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian
Only his outrage over Bush’s invasion of Iraq had stirred him to get involved in the partisan struggle.

Oh ? Maybe he's a beneficiary of Saddam's kickbacks. Not that he needs the money but the power and ego is everything.

8 posted on 10/11/2004 8:55:47 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian
Top Four Shadow Party Contributions to Democrat 527s Contributors (August 2000 – August 2004)

--------------------------------------------------------

Peter B. Lewis $14,375,000.00

George and Susan W. Soros $13,120,000.00

Jane Fonda $13,085,750.00

Stephen L. Bing $9,869,014.00

Courtesy The Center for Public Integrity

Okay, 3 points...

1. How many people know how much Hanoi Jane has given to the Democrat front groups? How many people know that she's given as much as Soros to support Kerry's election? How many vets know this?

2. Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance has just ensured that I will NEVER spend a dime with his company. I understand why it's behind the scenes because it's bad business. I don't want to buy his products knowing that some of it goes to fund his causes, which I disagree with.

3. Who the heck is Stephen Bing?

12 posted on 10/11/2004 9:04:36 PM PDT by Entrepreneur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

bttt


13 posted on 10/11/2004 9:09:00 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Kerry's OGBYN: Ogstetrics and Bynecology!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

Good article. Thanks for posting all three sections.


15 posted on 10/11/2004 9:10:24 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian; All
See discussion of this article here:

The Shadow Party: Part I

The Shadow Party: Part II

16 posted on 10/11/2004 9:10:45 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

Its sad to know that MOST AMERICANS will NEVER be privy to this information. The "elitist media" who are in bed with the dnc and soros would NEVER allow that information to be aired or printed so that the average American who comes home from work and reads the evening paper of listens to one of the "elitist networks" for his information. To do so would put and END to these activities. No, the "elitist media" wants to tell you WHAT to THINK, WHEN to THINK and HOW to THINK. You and I do NOT possess the ability to do that for ourselves. We must have those of the "elitist media" do that for us.


21 posted on 10/11/2004 9:29:27 PM PDT by TheEnigma47 (kerry will NEVER deserve forgiveness for his treachery to America's Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian
"..To the extent that the Shadow Party can be said to have an official launch date, July 17, 2003 probably fits the bill.[10] On that day, a team of political strategists, wealthy donors, leftwing labor leaders and other Democrat activists gathered at Soros’ Southampton beach house on Long Island. Aside from Soros, the most noteworthy attendee was Morton H. Halperin. Soros had hired Halperin in February 2002, to head the Washington office of his tax-exempt Open Society Institute – part of Soros’ global network of Open Society institutes and foundations located in more than 50 countries around the world. Given Halperin’s history, the appointment revealed much about Soros’ political goals..."

I wonder if there is any relation between Morton H. Halperin and Mark Halperin of ABC. (Pro Kerry memo on DRUDGE) I

22 posted on 10/11/2004 9:34:05 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

His wealth controls him. It's the only reason he is hell bent on ending capitalism. He knows it can evaporate if he still has to put it in play. My question is, is he a US citizen and if so, how can that status be stripped from him?


23 posted on 10/11/2004 9:36:52 PM PDT by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

Georgie Boy is one the the many rich leftist radicals in the world like Teresa Heinz Kerry who would "relish"...(no pun intended) world chaos......


26 posted on 10/11/2004 9:55:55 PM PDT by Stateline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian
After reading the series above, I came away with a much better understanding of the dangerous game Soros is playing.

Well maybe, but I still don't know what motivates George Soros. If he has a goal, what is it? Take control of the Rat party or create a new party? To what end? Is this man the devil incarnate? Do he and his minions actually want to rule the world?

“The (global capitalist) system is deeply flawed,” wrote Soros. “As long as capitalism remains triumphant, the pursuit of money overrides all other social considerations.” [6]

He's actually right about that you know, but it's an incomplete statement. He should go on to say "BUT there is no better system for allocation of resources that's been hit upon either". The fly in the ointment is the quest for money/power without some moral underpinnings will likely fall into disrepair just like any other system. Hence the necessity for them to remove all semblance of moral guidance from the mix to improve their profitability, at least in the short term. In the long term, we all lose.

I wonder if the guy isn't on some major guilt trip, but doesn't know how to deal with it? Seems he's all over the place with odd comments lately.

FGS

34 posted on 10/11/2004 11:03:25 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

Bookmarked for later


48 posted on 10/14/2004 4:12:27 AM PDT by shezza (Hello, my name is shezza and I am a FReepaholic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

Thanks for the post. BTTT!


49 posted on 10/14/2004 5:08:44 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MereChristian

btt


50 posted on 08/11/2005 9:08:30 PM PDT by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (did you get that THING I sent you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson