Posted on 10/10/2004 6:23:58 PM PDT by xzins
Why the World Hates George W. Bush
The Secular Drive to Marginalize Faith
By Allan Dobras
October 4, 2004
“For we are to God the aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and those who are perishing. To the one [the perishing] we are the smell of death; to the other [God], the fragrance of life.” St. Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians (II Cor. 3:6)
The scorn and vitriol heaped upon President Bush by his detractors during the three years plus of his presidency go far beyond political disagreements over how to best answer the pressing needs of the nation. There is little doubt that the president elicits a genuine and personal hatred from his critics, not only in this country but abroad as well. The question is, why?
In a strange dichotomy, President Bush is arguably one of the most decent men to have ever occupied the White House. He rarely has an unkind word to say about his critics even when they go after him with swords drawn. Insiders in the White House have nothing but good things to say about him and he comes from a respected, religious family that has endured decades of public life with nary a hint of scandal.
President Bush lifted himself up from an impetuous youth to the highest office in the land in no small part due to the mentoring of evangelist Billy Graham—one of the most admired men in the world—and his personal faith is a cornerstone in his life. This story alone should be the source of great praise and admiration, not derision. So why then is there so much hatred for George Bush?
Although some may say the hatred stems from the controversy over the Florida vote during the 2000 election, the reality is that the final analysis of the vote shows that George Bush won the election under any conceivable recount circumstance. Actually, the Gore campaign can be more faulted for its attempt to manipulate the Florida vote by insisting on a recount limited to three heavily Democrat counties.
Whether it is opposition toward some domestic political issue, his handling of the war on terror, or the war in Iraq, none can rationally account for the intensity of personal hatred leveled at President Bush as he seeks reelection. The answer to the “why,” is really part of an issue that simmers just below the surface but nonetheless evokes a level of hatred—and fear—that can only be understood in the context of the conflict between enduring truth and spiritless relativism. That is, a clash between two mutually exclusive worldviews—one driven by religious faith and the other driven by secular humanism.
Former Clinton labor secretary, Robert Reich, put this clash of worldviews in clear perspective in his July 1, 2004article entitled “Bush’s God,” which was published in The American Prospect. The article complains about a Bush campaign strategy that is designed to reach out to persons of faith. Mr. Reich says in part:
In its eagerness to promote the teaching of creationism in public schools, encourage school prayer, support anti-sodomy statutes, ban abortions, bar gay marriage, limit the use of stem cells, reduce access to contraceptives, and advance the idea of America as a "Christian nation," the Bush administration has done more to politicize religion than any administration in recent American history…The great conflict of the 21st century may be between the West and terrorism. But terrorism is a tactic, not a belief. The underlying battle will be between modern civilization and anti-modernist fanatics; between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe blind allegiance to a higher authority; between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is no more than preparation for an existence beyond life; between those who believe that truth is revealed solely through scripture and religious dogma, and those who rely primarily on science, reason, and logic. Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But terrorism is not the only danger we face.
In essence, Mr. Reich is saying that “Bush’s God” is more of a threat to modern civilization than fanatical terrorism. His description of the issues at risk because of the president’s faith—sodomy, abortion, gay marriage, embryonic stem cell research, and contraceptives—reveals that little imagination is needed to see that sexual liberation is at the heart of the clash between the opposing worldviews.
With sexual liberation as the goal, there is no doubt that homosexual affirmation is the instrument being used to undermine the values associated with “Bush’s God.” Hedonistic secularists realize that the legitimization of homosexuality—particularly legalization of gay marriage—is a dagger into the heart of the Christian faith and the institutions that shelter its values.
President Bush’s adherence to the principles of his faith represents a formidable obstacle to victory. That is the reason why he is at once hated and also feared, for as St. Paul said, the believer has “the aroma of death,” to the perishing. Therefore, his removal from the presidency must be accomplished at all costs. To accomplish this goal, the president’s detractors have mounted a fierce, personal attack on him through dozens of recently published books, several movies, numerous commentaries, and by a heavily imbalanced popular media.
Additionally, Mr. Reich suggests that the president is an “anti-modernist fanatic” and his religious views place him far out of the mainstream, but recent Gallup polls show the opposite: 68 percent of Americans favor teaching both creationism and evolution in the public schools; 78% of the American people favor a constitutional amendment to allow voluntary prayer in public schools; 68 % of the American people agree that partial-birth abortion should be banned; thirty-nine states have so far passed defense of marriage acts prohibiting gay marriage; and since the June 2003 decision by the Supreme Court that declared the Texas sodomy law unconstitutional, opposition to legalization of same-sex relations has increased to 49% compared to 43% who favor legalization.
One may debate Reich’s view that America should not be regarded as a “Christian nation,” but it should be pointed out that over 80 percent of the American people identify themselves as Christian; most of the founding fathers of our republic considered themselves Christians; and Christian-Judean values had a tremendous influence in the nation’s founding documents, laws, and rules of government. Although it is clear that the founding fathers avoided the establishment of a religious theocracy, it is equally clear there was no intent to insulate government from religious influence—and therein lies the rub.
Quite clearly, it has been the strategy of hedonic secularists to use homosexuality as a spearhead in its drive to marginalize the faith and infuse sexual freedom. To great extent, they have successfully invaded almost every institution in America with a message of acceptance toward sodomy as a lifestyle preference. Much of industry, government, media, and academia celebrate “gay pride,” require “gay” sensitivity training, offer domestic partner benefits, and prohibit contrary points of view.
It is readily apparent how important the infusion of unmitigated sexual “freedom” into the church and the culture is to the secularists, and why they are working so hard to defeat President Bush. A leader who believes in the existence of absolute truth, a president who seeks to apply his faith to his life, is a threat to a post-modern secularist in principle. In an age when the most grievous of sins is to interject your religious beliefs into the public debate, those in leadership positions who profess to know Truth set themselves up for fierce opposition.
Al Dobras is a freelance writer on religious and cultural issues and an electronics engineer. He lives in Springfield, Virginia.
No, your memory is accurate. It's a fabulous book.
They believe in the primacy of the state in the life of the individual; but they also insist that the individual should be completely free to engage in any kind of perversion or culturally suicidal behavior. They demand that the state encourage this and quash dissenting views, which is why secularism is rigidly enforced in the schools.
Correct again. But what is worse, our society tells people, "Go ahead and do what you want, but when things go wrong, we'll save you from the consequences of your own actions!" That's an outrage. To force the hardworking to support the lazy is a slap in the face of the hardworking and encourages laziness. To force the moral to support the immoral is a slap in the face of the moral and encourages immorality.
If people want to do what they want, let them suffer the consequences of their actions. Don't go crying to the government.
Muslims are the biggest pack of buttboys on the planet. It's normal for even married men to indulge.
Having said that, there's no way they would tolerate sodomarriage.
Definitely not. Men are expected to marry women and sire children. If a man does that, no one cares if he keeps a entire harem of boys.
Many cultures have tolerated homosexual activity, but none (until our own) treated homosexuality as equally acceptable to heterosexuality. Men have universally been expected to marry women. In other words, homosexuality was and is acceptable as a side dish, not the main course.
You appear to lack Christian charity. Surely you must believe that there is one Muslim somewhere on Earth that does not hate!
Thanks for the response and very well stated. I think Christians and other un-pc types are fooling themselves if they think that the left will stop at recognition of same sex marriage. The endgame isn't just government approval of a sinful lifestyle, it's absolute 100% acceptance of this lifestyle by all people.
That's why we see laws against the criticism of homosexuality beginning to crop up in Canada and Sweden. The Christian Church (most of it, anyway) is the last major cultural institution that actively encourages people to resist the leftist cultural revolution. It's no surprise that leftists invests so much time and resources in overthrowing Christian denominations, or react so bitterly and wrathfully when they fail (Southern Baptists.)
It's not a conspiracy as such, they just do what comes naturally.
"The great conflict of the 21st century may be between the West and terrorism. But terrorism is a tactic, not a belief.
Terrorism is a tactic that stems from a belief.(I'd like to hear his definition of 'belief')
"The underlying battle will be between modern civilization and anti-modernist fanatics...
I'd also like to hear his definition of 'modern civilization'
"...between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe blind allegiance to a higher authority...
Nobody owes anyone 'blind allegiance' especially christians.
"...between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is no more than preparation for an existence beyond life..."
So life is 'nothing more' than a prep for the next life? So then because his own world view is absolutely true,there is no 'next life' therefore it's a waste of time.
"...between those who believe that truth is revealed solely through scripture and religious dogma, and those who rely primarily on science, reason, and logic."
As if the two are opposed to each other.Does that mean that sodomy and it's almost free reign are a result of "science,reason and logic"?
"Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But terrorism is not the only danger we face."
He sure got that right! It's just the details I'd disagree with.
Good points all, Mitch.
My take on Reich is that he is a secularist and cannot see that many of his comments are those of a true believer in his own brand of religion.
There's just no explaining anything to you. You just go off on a tangent and forget what the article is about. I'll just remember to NEVER respond to any of your posts in the future. Zowie!!
Absolutely. Homosexual activists want nothing short than 100% acceptance of their lifestyle. To disapprove of homosexuality, or to refuse to genuflect before any other liberal icon, is to be guilty of "hate."
That's why we see laws against the criticism of homosexuality beginning to crop up in Canada and Sweden. The Christian Church (most of it, anyway) is the last major cultural institution that actively encourages people to resist the leftist cultural revolution. It's no surprise that leftists invests so much time and resources in overthrowing Christian denominations, or react so bitterly and wrathfully when they fail (Southern Baptists.)
The left hates religion (especially the organized variety) because religion demands a higher loyalty to and teaches a rival set of moral standards than the State. The leftist-controlled State demands absolutely loyalty from its subjects and in exchange offers security. The leftist State is also the sole arbiter of what is right and wrong, which, as the history of totalitarian regimes shows, can actually vary considerably from time to time, depending on the exigencies of the moment. It's not a conspiracy as such, they just do what comes naturally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.