A VERY REAL CONSPIRACY

As an answer to every Bill Clinton indiscretion or any democratic anti-American policy blunder, Hillary Clinton made famous the phrase “right wing conspiracy”. There never was one of course, but it always accomplished the much needed diversion from the endless stream of Clinton scandals by shifting focus off of the immediate scandal, onto the imaginary conspiracy.

However, a very real conspiracy is underway in America today, it isn’t coming from those “nasty right wingers”, and the proof is all around us.

The Democratic Party has been promoting the idea that Republicans intend to steal the 2004 election. The rhetorical theory used to promote this idea is mass voter suppression. The rhetoric reached such a fever pitch that Democrats demanded and received outside international monitoring of the upcoming election, as if we were some third world country struggling with our first election, a move that may forever change our national sovereignty concerning the U.S. election process, and not for the better.

What if I told you that this was no accident? That an evil mastermind who became one of the world’s richest men by crippling the economies of countless nations around the globe, was using his ill gotten billions to control American policy by positioning himself to control the man in the White House?

What if I told you that this evil man has an evil plan for America, a plan that was designed to weaken America by legalizing illicit drug use, promoting free abortions coast to coast, attacking the traditional family unit, abolishing religious speech and gun rights, installing a socialist form of government, outlawing capitalism, and subjecting the governance of the United States to a one world order, under a one world court?

This man exists, his name is George Soros, this is his history, these are his plans, and you better read his book, The Bubble of American Supremacy.

What if I told you he was able to infiltrate one of the two major U.S. political parties, aligning himself with powerful party operatives, buying their loyalty at a time when they would otherwise be given no power at all by the American people through the normal election process?

What if I told you he was able to do so by first successfully pushing for campaign finance reform, then immediately circumventing that reform legislation through a carefully designed web of 527 shadow party organizations set up to outspend and overpower the legitimate election process?

Well he has, his co-conspirators include noteworthy political operatives like Morton H. Halperin, Leslie Gelb, Daniel Ellsberg, John Podesta; Jeremy Rosner, Steven Rosenthal, and others. If you don’t know who these people are, I suggest you search them immediately; they are all part of the far left wing of the Democratic Party, and all powerful party insiders.

Soros was one of the major supporters of campaign finance reform that culminated in the passage of McCain-Feingold, and then the first to circumvent that law through shadow party organization that include 527’s America Coming Together, The Media Fund, MoveOn.org, Center for American Progress, America Votes, Joint Victory Campaign 2004, and The Thunder Road Group, just to name a few.

Most American’s believe these to be innocent grass roots campaign “get out the vote” type efforts led by average concerned American’s, but nothing could be further from the truth. All of these organizations are shadow party groups funded and controlled by George Soros and his band of socialist brothers.

What if I told you that mainstream news rooms across America were working in tandem with these organizations, their backers, and the DNC Kerry Campaign by shaping the headlines to suit the purposes of this so-called “progressive” agenda, in a clear cut attempt to advance their common cause of a socialist America?

If you hadn’t noticed before, it should be clear after watching the events of “memogate” unfold at CBS, involving one of America’s most respected news casters Dan Rather, and his accomplished producer, Mary Mapes.

If that doesn’t convince you, maybe comments from Peter Jennings and Tom Brokaw’s defense of Rather and Mapes will, both of whom are more angered by the fact that CBS was caught, than what CBS did, both of whom are more concerned with what they term “White House attempts to smear Dan Rather” than Dan Rather’s fraudulent attempt to smear a sitting war time President.

What if I told you that the international monitors being brought in to oversee the 2004 Presidential election were corrupt left wing operatives themselves, also interested in removing Bush from office in an effort to bring America to its knee’s in the world community? They are…

What if I told you that an attempt to steal this election is underway, not by anyone’s effort to suppress votes, but rather to count illegal fraudulent votes being manufactured by the Democratic “get out the vote” effort, heavily concentrated in Democratic precincts and American prisons? It is…

What if I told you that the Democratic Party has hired 25,000 attorney’s focused on 17 battleground states where the DNC hopes the vote is close enough to challenge, for the purpose of forcing unsuspecting local election volunteers to accept every voter, legitimate or not? They have…

What if I told you that the Democratic ticket, John Kerry and John Edwards, along with all of these co-conspiracy efforts were publicly supported, in part designed by both the Socialist and Communist Parties based right here in the good old United States of America? They are!

And what if I told you that the mainstream press has no intention of reporting any of this, but rather to continue undermining the President, the war on terror, and the U.S. economy in order to assist with the election of John Kerry?

What if I told you that a vote for John Kerry and John Edwards was a vote to support all of this evil activity, against the will of more than 80% of the troops serving in battle today, and at odds with every soldier who has ever given his life for the freedom’s and liberties we so freely abuse today?

What if I told you that more than 40% of the American voting population intends to do just that? This would be the conspiracy of all conspiracies, wouldn’t it?

What if I told you that the Kerry campaign, the national media, and international terrorists are helping each other? They are, every time terrorists strike, the Kerry camp cranks up their anti-war rhetoric, the national press only covers those attacks, none of the rest of the story, resulting in shaken U.S. resolve and support for the war on terror, and terrorists are rewarded for their efforts. The defeat of their strongest opponent, George W. Bush, being their ultimate goal.

The problem is its ALL true, every last word of it, every supporting link, every accusation, and every piece of this sorted puzzle. It isn’t just a conspiracy theory, it is a real life massive conspiracy intended to unseat Bush at any cost, and bring American power down to a level acceptable to the balance of the world.

The world, in particular members of the EU, is not happy with only one remaining superpower, even when it is America, who has liberated more than 70 countries, including most of the EU nations, and has fed the world for decades.

Well, you are the only one who can stop it! By helping to make certain this information reaches the American people, and by casting your vote to defeat these efforts.

No amount of money, no amount of wishing or waiting will make it go away. Only your vote can stop it. Soros supporters will be there November 2nd, every last one of them, even those who have no idea what they are supporting, and don’t want to know.

T he Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)

WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 6.04.04
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

NEW! compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com

NEW! unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.
Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.
To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
George Soros

eorge Soros could not have more clearly enunciated the lethal danger that he and John Kerry and the clintons and the rest of his leftist cabal pose for America.

Yesterday, at the "progressive," i.e., ultra-extremist left-wing liberal, "Take Back America" confab, Mr. Soros confirmed the obvious: 9/11 was dispositive for the Dems; that is, 9/11 accelerated what eight years of the clintons had set into motion, namely, the demise of a Democratic party that is increasingly irrelevant, unflinchingly corrupt, unwaveringly self-serving, chronically moribund and above all, lethally, seditiously dangerous.

"All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Apparently missing the irony, George Soros chastised America with these words even as he was trying his $25,000,000, 527-end-run damnedest to render himself "more equal than others" in order to foist his radical, paranoic, deadly dementia on an entire nation.

"Animal Farm" is George Orwell's satirical allegory of the Russian Revolution; but it could just as easily be the story of the Democratic Party of today, with the

Kennedy-Pelosi-Gore-clinton (either--"one for the price of two," I say) -Sulzberger-Soros-Moore construct

its porcine manifestation.

SOROS TSURIS

Soros' little speech reveals everything we need to know about the Left, to wit:

its naivete about the War on Terror,
its preference for demagoguery over rational argument, and ideology and reacquisition of power over national security,
its mindset, which is inextricably bound to its failed, tortuous, reckless schemes, relics of a different time, a different war and a different enemy.

Soros is correct when he states that each of the two pillars of the Bush Doctine--the United States maintenance of absolute military superiority and the United States right of preemptive action--are "valid propositions" [in a post-9/11 world].

But when he proceeds from there to argue that the validity of each of these two [essential] pillars is somehow nullified by the resultant unequalled power that these two pillars, when taken together, vest in the United States, rational thought and national-security primacy give way to dogmatic Leftist neo-neoliberal ideology.

What is, in fact, "inviolate" here is the neo-neoliberal doctrine of U.S. sovereignty, which states simply that there must be none, that we must yield our sovereignty to the United Nations. Because this Leftist tenet is inviolate, and because it is the antithesis of the concept of U.S. sovereignty enunciated by the Bush Doctrine and the concept of U.S. sovereignty required by the War on Terror, rabid Leftists like Soros conclude that we must trash the latter two inconvenient concepts--even if critical to the survival of our country.

It is precisely here where Soros and the Left fail utterly to understand the War on Terror. They cannot see beyond their own ideology and lust for power. They have become a danger to this country no less lethal than the terrorists they aid and abet.

I think this administration has the right strategic vision and has taken many of the steps needed to get that long-term strategy rolling.
Where I give them the failing grade is in explaining that vision to the American public and the world. Key example: this White House enshrines preemptive war in the latest National Security Strategy and that scares the hell out of a lot of Americans, not to mention our allies. Why? This administration fails to distinguish sufficiently under what conditions that strategy makes reasonable sense.
My point is this: when you are explicit about the world being divided into globalization's Core and Gap, you can distinguish between the different security rule sets at work in each.
Nothing has changed about strategic deterrence or the concept of mutual-assured destruction (or MAD) within the Core, so fears about preemptive wars triggering World War III are misplaced.
When this administration talks about preemption, they're talking strictly about the Gap - not the Core. The strategic stability that defines the Core is not altered one whit by this new strategy, because preemption is all about striking first against actors or states you believe - quite reasonably - are undeterrable in the normal sense.
Thomas P.M. Barnett
The Pentagon's New Map
NB: Dr. Barnett is a lifelong DEMOCRAT

I'm a single-issue voter, as I guess must have become apparent.
I'm not a Republican. I'm not a conservative. I'm not a very great admirer of the president in many ways, but I think that my condition is... that this is an administration that wakes up every morning wondering how to make life hard for the forces of Jihad and how to make as hard as possible an unapologetic defense of civilization against this kind of barbarism... and though the Bush administration has been rife with disappointment on this and incompetent, I nonetheless feel that they have some sense of that spirit.

I don't get that... I don't get that feeling from anyone who even sought the Democratic nomination.

I would [therefore] have to vote for the reelection of President Bush.
Christopher Hitchens
Washington Journal, 6.01.04
C-SPAN

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004

MORE

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.