Posted on 10/09/2004 7:48:50 AM PDT by ClintonBeGone
First, Id like to congratulate Australias Prime Minister John Howard for winning an unprecedented fourth term; even though John Kerrys sister Diana (at her brothers direction) worked diligently against him. Well done, Mr. Howard! Despite the Kerry familys obsessive attempt to unseat the Australian prime minister and overthrow his government (due to PM Howards unflinching support of President Bushs and the US coalition of nations Iraq policies) PM Howard has won. The Kerry family has an unswerving history of working with both the enemies of the US and the far-left of other countries. This history began with John Kerrys clandestine meetings with Communist North Vietnamese leaders during the Viet Nam war. He worked for the communists and against the United States of America. Apparently, Mr. Kerrys penchant toward weakening (or outright castrating) the United States has not altered, from his early days.
Although the upcoming US presidential election is not completely concomitant with the Australian elections, I have to wonder whether or not it might indicate the beginnings of a trend. The world has become a much smaller place and elections in other US alliance countries may be beginning to have an influence on US elections. It appears that the Kerry family sees it that way. For some time, the leftists (AKA communists and socialists) have been working together, world-wide, to topple the governments of sovereign nations; working towards the establishment of a leftist-run world government. At least the Australian voters didnt buy the leftists subterfuge. The Australians woke up to the attempted leftist takeover and voted accordingly. Considering their indefatigable efforts in Australia, the John Kerry family must take PM Howards victory as a loss to them. Could this John Kerry and Kerry family loss in Australia signal a loss for him in the upcoming US presidential election? Lets look forward to it.
An interesting note to last nights debate was when Kerry (in response to a question from an undecided voter) looked directly into the camera and unequivocally stated: I'm pledging I will not raise taxes. I'm giving a tax cut to the people earning less than $200,000 a year. Uh-huh. Sure he will when pigs fly. MSNBCs Tim Russert and leftist Tom Brokaw were appalled by Kerrys comment. This was the same type of comment that brought down President George H.W. Bushs run for a second term when he said Read my lips. No new taxes. President Bush 41 was unable to keep that promise and was, subsequently, defeated by Clinton. Tim Russerts post-debate comments to Chris Matthews were "I never thought I'd see another 'Read my lips, no new taxes,' Chris. Never in my lifetime!" An equally incredulous Brokaw said John Kerry is now firmly committed to never raising taxes on anyone who makes less than $200,000, period." Even Kerrys mainstream media pals are now saying he wont be able to keep promise. Suffice it to say this was, yet, another Kerry ploy of tell them [the public] anything to win. Ill sort it out afterwards.
Will the US voting public be able to see through Mr. Kerrys pompous pretense and deceit, in the way the Australian voters saw through PM John Howards leftist competitor? Will US voters finally realize the truth of the strong and consistent leadership of President George W. Bush in opposition to the ever- vacillating anything to win message of John Kerry? I only pray that we in the US are as intelligent as the Australians.
------------
About the author: About the author: Sher Zieve is a Conservative political commentator. She firmly believes that if Leftists were to run the country (and left to their own devices), it would be the end of the United States as a sovereign nation.
Email: earthseed@iwon.com
If her exterior is as lovely as her soul, not finding a pic is a good thing.
Yep....Bush will also win by a huge margain...as goes Australia so goes America. ;o)
Well, we can only hope she comes back here to "help" her brother.
Yes, it is disgusting and in their politically tin ear fashion the dim/libs apparently didn't consider that the Aussies might resent her patronizing interference.
ditto
I'm aware of those comments...I was wondering if she was quoted often in the papers, or did she participate in the politcial pundit shows, did she actively campaign for Latham...
Or was she just limited to those initial comments.
Actually, that picture is Perry Kerry, but you get the idea.
Sorry, I mean Peggy Kerry. Need to wake up!
Don't feel bad Rawhide, I'm still trying to figure out how to post a picture. Guess I will just have to keep enjoying someone elses.
sKerry's sister has alot of her brother in her. How arrogant does a person have to be to travel to another country and try to influence an election. I hate it when the press writes about what Europeans feel and want in this American election.....but I'd hate it more to actually see one of them come over here and try to influence our election. I hope we end up sending the left, Europe and sKerry a family a strong message by re-electing President Bush.
I don't know what Howard's win says about Kerry, but it certainly proves that Australia isn't Spain. They aren't about to knuckle under to terrorist threats.
Neither, I think, is the United States.
I do not know why the command did not come out. Here it is again.
Use the < key at the very beginning and the > key the very end of this command.
img src="paste picture address(URL) here"
I hope that makes sense to you?
One of the reasons, that I believe, Bush chose to proceed without France and Germany. Why send our soldiers in with troops from countries that are already "sleeping with the enemy"? American troops were actually safer without French and German help.
but the MSM 'missed' it...
The MSM IGNORED it.
Par for the course with the Kerrys
Ugh. Didn't need that visual!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.