Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could A John Kerry Loss Be Signaled By John Howard’s Win?
Useless-Knowledge.com ^ | 10/09/2004 | Sher Zieve

Posted on 10/09/2004 7:48:50 AM PDT by ClintonBeGone

First, I’d like to congratulate Australia’s Prime Minister John Howard for winning an unprecedented fourth term; even though John Kerry’s sister Diana (at her brother’s direction) worked diligently against him. Well done, Mr. Howard! Despite the Kerry family’s obsessive attempt to unseat the Australian prime minister and overthrow his government (due to PM Howard’s unflinching support of President Bush’s and the US coalition of nations’ Iraq policies) PM Howard has won. The Kerry family has an unswerving history of working with both the enemies of the US and the far-left of other countries. This history began with John Kerry’s clandestine meetings with Communist North Vietnamese leaders during the Viet Nam war. He worked for the communists and against the United States of America. Apparently, Mr. Kerry’s penchant toward weakening (or outright castrating) the United States has not altered, from his early days.

Although the upcoming US presidential election is not completely concomitant with the Australian elections, I have to wonder whether or not it might indicate the beginnings of a trend. The world has become a much smaller place and elections in other US alliance countries may be beginning to have an influence on US elections. It appears that the Kerry family sees it that way. For some time, the leftists (AKA communists and socialists) have been working together, world-wide, to topple the governments of sovereign nations; working towards the establishment of a leftist-run world government. At least the Australian voters didn’t buy the leftist’s subterfuge. The Australians woke up to the attempted leftist takeover and voted accordingly. Considering their indefatigable efforts in Australia, the John Kerry family must take PM Howard’s victory as a loss to them. Could this John Kerry and Kerry family loss in Australia signal a loss for him in the upcoming US presidential election? Let’s look forward to it.

An interesting note to last night’s debate was when Kerry (in response to a question from an ‘undecided voter’) looked directly into the camera and unequivocally stated: “I'm pledging I will not raise taxes. I'm giving a tax cut to the people earning less than $200,000 a year.” Uh-huh. Sure he will…when pigs fly. MSNBC’s Tim Russert and leftist Tom Brokaw were appalled by Kerry’s comment. This was the same type of comment that brought down President George H.W. Bush’s run for a second term when he said “Read my lips. No new taxes”. President Bush 41 was unable to keep that promise and was, subsequently, defeated by Clinton. Tim Russert’s post-debate comments to Chris Matthews were "I never thought I'd see another 'Read my lips, no new taxes,' Chris. Never in my lifetime!" An equally incredulous Brokaw said “…John Kerry is now firmly committed to never raising taxes on anyone who makes less than $200,000, period." Even Kerry’s mainstream media pals are now saying he won’t be able to keep promise. Suffice it to say this was, yet, another Kerry ploy of ‘tell them [the public] anything to win. I’ll sort it out afterwards’.

Will the US voting public be able to see through Mr. Kerry’s pompous pretense and deceit, in the way the Australian voters saw through PM John Howard’s leftist competitor? Will US voters finally realize the truth of the strong and consistent leadership of President George W. Bush in opposition to the ever- vacillating ‘anything to win’ message of John Kerry? I only pray that we in the US are as intelligent as the Australians.

------------

About the author: About the author: Sher Zieve is a Conservative political commentator. She firmly believes that if Leftists were to run the country (and left to their own devices), it would be the end of the United States as a sovereign nation.

Email: earthseed@iwon.com


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 1stkerrydefeat; austrialia; diana; dianakerry; howard; johnhoward; kerry; kerrysister
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: bitt
I was looking for her ugly mug, but found this instead...

If her exterior is as lovely as her soul, not finding a pic is a good thing.

21 posted on 10/09/2004 8:18:22 AM PDT by niteowl77 (John Kerry: over 30 years of proudly inciting hatred against American soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Yep....Bush will also win by a huge margain...as goes Australia so goes America. ;o)


22 posted on 10/09/2004 8:18:25 AM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Well, we can only hope she comes back here to "help" her brother.


23 posted on 10/09/2004 8:20:03 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

Yes, it is disgusting and in their politically tin ear fashion the dim/libs apparently didn't consider that the Aussies might resent her patronizing interference.


24 posted on 10/09/2004 8:22:28 AM PDT by Let's Roll (For a guy who shirks his own job, Kerry sure is eager to tell others what they should do ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

ditto


25 posted on 10/09/2004 8:24:05 AM PDT by CouncilofTrent (Quo Primum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: edskid
Diana Kerry
26 posted on 10/09/2004 8:27:43 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I'm aware of those comments...I was wondering if she was quoted often in the papers, or did she participate in the politcial pundit shows, did she actively campaign for Latham...

Or was she just limited to those initial comments.


27 posted on 10/09/2004 8:29:01 AM PDT by Guillermo (OJ is innocent because Mark Fuhrman said the "N" word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Diana Kerry:
28 posted on 10/09/2004 8:29:57 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: edskid; bitt

Actually, that picture is Perry Kerry, but you get the idea.


29 posted on 10/09/2004 8:31:29 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Sorry, I mean Peggy Kerry. Need to wake up!


30 posted on 10/09/2004 8:32:45 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Don't feel bad Rawhide, I'm still trying to figure out how to post a picture. Guess I will just have to keep enjoying someone elses.


31 posted on 10/09/2004 8:32:58 AM PDT by Jarhead1957 (Turned off Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: edskid; bitt
Here is the lovely (cough-cough) Diana Kerry:
32 posted on 10/09/2004 8:38:02 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

sKerry's sister has alot of her brother in her. How arrogant does a person have to be to travel to another country and try to influence an election. I hate it when the press writes about what Europeans feel and want in this American election.....but I'd hate it more to actually see one of them come over here and try to influence our election. I hope we end up sending the left, Europe and sKerry a family a strong message by re-electing President Bush.


33 posted on 10/09/2004 8:40:07 AM PDT by Arpege92 (We're here! We're Conservative! And we're in your face! - theDentist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead1957
Easy to post picture. 1.Right click on picture you want to post, select properties. 2.Highlight the address(URL) of the picture, do a copy(ctrl+c). 3.Use the following command when you want to reply to a post on FR: 4.Do a preview before you post, and you should see your picture. 5.Then post.
34 posted on 10/09/2004 8:46:43 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

I don't know what Howard's win says about Kerry, but it certainly proves that Australia isn't Spain. They aren't about to knuckle under to terrorist threats.

Neither, I think, is the United States.


35 posted on 10/09/2004 8:51:47 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead1957

I do not know why the command did not come out. Here it is again.
Use the < key at the very beginning and the > key the very end of this command.

img src="paste picture address(URL) here"

I hope that makes sense to you?


36 posted on 10/09/2004 8:54:41 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bitt
...like Germany and France, that have deliberately undermined America before, during and after the war.

One of the reasons, that I believe, Bush chose to proceed without France and Germany. Why send our soldiers in with troops from countries that are already "sleeping with the enemy"? American troops were actually safer without French and German help.

37 posted on 10/09/2004 8:56:35 AM PDT by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt
RE: Sister Kerry in Australia.

but the MSM 'missed' it...

The MSM IGNORED it.

38 posted on 10/09/2004 9:01:18 AM PDT by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bitt
'Kerry's sisters actions going to Austrialia and trying to unseat the primeminister - a stalwart allie in our war on terror - is absolutely disgusting.'

Par for the course with the Kerrys

39 posted on 10/09/2004 9:11:27 AM PDT by talleyman (Treason is as treason does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AF68
Diana Kerry is indeed despicable. I wouldn't be surprised if Janet Reno dumps Donna Shalalala and moves in with that gangly skank.

Ugh. Didn't need that visual!

40 posted on 10/09/2004 9:12:35 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson