Posted on 10/09/2004 4:52:39 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
Turmoil over Afghan vote boycott
Afghanistan's first democratic election has been thrown into confusion after it was announced that most presidential candidates were boycotting it. The move follows claims of widespread voting irregularities. The boycott was agreed by 15 candidates opposed to the favourite, the interim President Hamid Karzai, reports say. BBC News Online's Sanjoy Majumder in Kabul says it will be a major setback for poll organisers if the credibility of the election is undermined.
UN officials insist the poll will continue.
The vote has been widely seen as a chance for Mr Karzai to extend his authority beyond the capital, Kabul. He has led the country since the fall of the hard-line Islamic Taleban nearly three years ago.
'Call it off' The boycott has for now overshadowed fears that Taleban militants might disrupt the vote. "Today's election is not a legitimate election," presidential candidate Abdul Satar Sirat said after hosting a meeting in which it is reported that 15 candidates signed up to the boycott.
"It should be stopped and we don't recognise the results."
The allegations of voter fraud arose after complaints that the indelible ink used to mark voters' fingers can be washed off. The only woman candidate, Masooda Jalal, told the Associated Press: "The ink that is being used can be rubbed off in a minute. Voters can vote 10 times." Earlier on Saturday polling was briefly suspended in some areas of the capital, Kabul, and the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif while the complaints were investigated. But our correspondent says the extent of potential fraud remains to be seen, and the row has provided a convenient rallying point for a previously disunited opposition.
A senior United Nations official helping supervise the vote said that "overall it has been safe and orderly". "The vote will continue because halting the vote at this stage is unjustified and would deny these people their right to vote," Ray Kennedy said.
On hearing reports of the boycott, some voters in Kabul urged candidates not to be hasty. "This is Afghanistan's first election. There are bound to be problems. Give it a chance," one man, Dost Mohammed, told BBC News Online. But others were more sceptical. "I believe those who have boycotted the elections are right. I saw myself that I could easily rub the ink from our fingers," said Ibadullah, a student.
'Optimistic' Apart from Mr Karzai, only two other candidates have not signed up to the boycott, reports say. They both stood down in his favour on the last day of the campaign.
It is not clear how the election organisers will respond to the boycott. Earlier they had insisted that voting would continue. Farook Wardak, head of the Joint Election Management Board, said marker pens were being used in some cases instead of the indelible ink, while in other cases, the correct ink was being applied to the wrong part of the finger. "Where the correct ink is applied it stays on," he told BBC News Online. President Karzai voted early in Kabul, saying it was a great day for the Afghan people.
He is widely tipped to win, although Uzbek General Abdul Rashid Dostum and Tajik former education minister Yunus Qanuni have fought high-profile campaigns.
Correspondents say much will depend on how the country's various power brokers react to the result and how far the victor is prepared to challenge the political status quo in a country sometimes described as a series of mini-fiefdoms.
Security has been the leading concern in the run-up to the election, with up to 100,000 Afghan and international security personnel on high alert.
The first vote was cast by an Afghan refugee in neighbouring Pakistan, where voting opened slightly earlier.
"I am very happy," said 19-year-old Moqadasa Sidiqi, after she voted in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. Voting is scheduled to finish at 1600 local time (1130GMT), but could be extended if there is a large turnout and people still wish to vote. Ballot boxes will then be sealed and transported to eight regional counting centres.
Initial results are expected in the coming days but it may take a couple of weeks for all the votes to be counted. |
Never a dull moment.
Ah, yes, the BBC straining at gnats and swallowing camels again.
Whatever puts the US, and specifically George Bush, in a bad light.
Have at it, you den of socialist-nihilist devils. People are getting tired of your sick perspective. Even the Brits want to pull the BBC off the government teat.
Gosh, the losers might fail to recognize the legitimacy of the election. Democrats might have more in common with the people of Afghanistan than they realize.
I didn't know they had Democrats in Afghanistan!
I'm surprised the loosers aren't out in force telling people how to remove the ink and re-vote.
This once again, is the MSM trying to show the negative side of what clearly is a Bush success!
BTW, Kerry and Fraudulent MSM can KMA!
Poll Stations Close in Historic Afghan Elections With No Major Taliban Attacks
Why any media outlet would expect this to come off without a hitch is beyond me. This is the first democratic election in a backwater country last ruled by a totalitarian regime under Islamic religious law. Anybody who expected flawless elections is deluded. It is important that the Afghan equivalent of our democrats not be allowed to disrupt this election. If they are serious about being elected, let them get themselves elected by appealing to the voters. The days of Sharia law are over and they need to get over it.
The worse pain and misery for our troops and the people they are liberating in Afghanistan and Iraq the better for John Kerry (and the liberal socialist Democrats).
Hey, we need to get some of those pens to control the DNC voter fraud.
In what way were they boycotting? Were there names taken off the ballots? If it's just that they are not going to vote themselves, then the electorate still have a choice if they're still on the ballot.
Sounds like Medea Benjamin has been over there again.
It reminds me of the spin on the Loya Jurga (sp) -- "It's a farce! Quagmire! Foul! Warlords!"
Of course, if Jimmy Carter had been there, flanked by Taliban bodyguards, it would all be peachy keen. With a little luck, he might even have gotten Arafat on the ballot....
The media is looking for something, anything to find wrong with this election. Expect every mole hill to become Everest.
One goood thing about two year olds who learn to say "NO" is that they age to three and get over it.
Never a dull moment.Dang DemocRATS! :^O
I hope this idiotic "boycott" gives Kerry some ideas. I'd love to see his dumb ass boycott the election this November 2nd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.