Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In a debate with no high points, the final question was one last chance to stump the President. Gibson chooses a question which is designed to put Bush on the defensive, hopefully having to answer for mistakes, and allowing Kerry the last word criticizing President Bush, making a striking final impression.

This would have been a fair question to ask sometime before the end of the debate, followed by a question to Kerry about some similiar perceived deficiencies. To ask it at the end is clearly an attempt to leave a final impression that the President was on the defensive, having to answer for his shortcoming, and that Kerry was on the offensive, attacking Bush for his mistakes. A subtle ploy, but it could have been very effective. I think President Bush sidestepped this landmine deftly, but it clearly show's a moderator bias in attempting to give Kerry a powerful parting shot

1 posted on 10/08/2004 10:25:07 PM PDT by huac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: huac

It's hard to get a parting shot when your whimpering in the dugout...

sKerry got whomped! and the whole world saw it. Don't believe me take a poll in your own house. Mine came out

Bush 2
sKerry 0


2 posted on 10/08/2004 10:28:22 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

Wow -- the Gray Lady must be looking for some sort of redemption if they're willing to call Gibson on his bias. A good second step would be to call him on his attempts to interject his personal follow-up questions.


3 posted on 10/08/2004 10:28:26 PM PDT by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

This is from the NYT?


5 posted on 10/08/2004 10:31:46 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac
I groaned when I heard that question and screamed at the TV, "What a loaded question...".

It was horribly biased of Gibson to try to slap Bush and run like a little kid back to his house. I was so proud and amazed with the Solomom style way that Pres. Bush answered it. And he called a spade a spade, questioning the integrity of the question! WAY TO GO BUSH!

6 posted on 10/08/2004 10:32:12 PM PDT by Danno (the Dems have poop in their pants...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

Heard at the Tart residence, in stereo: "So, Mr. Bush, when did you stop beating your wife?"

We were not amused at the final question. Unless, of course, al-Q'erry were ALSO asked to name three mistakes HE made. I've got a list to help him out....


7 posted on 10/08/2004 10:33:29 PM PDT by Watery Tart (“Che” -- a good collectivist who college girls would TOTALLY do. -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac
What else could they say after the ABC Memo?

It seems as if ABC is going to take over the bias business from them for a while.

8 posted on 10/08/2004 10:33:56 PM PDT by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

You are so right. The bias is unbelievable. Think about it. After The President answers it, the question is then Kerry's "name 3 mistakes the president has made". Unreal. Kerry never gets asked for 3 mistakes he's made in his 20 years as senator. Having said that, the great thing is, Bush took it to Kerry. He didn't fall for the trap. He called the lady on it. He told her "look, when people ask this question, they are really asking...was Iraq a mistake? That's what you want to know isn't it. No it wasn't a mistake." (paraphrasing) It was the greatest out of the ball park answer by the President. He was on his game tonight. No doubt about it.


9 posted on 10/08/2004 10:33:59 PM PDT by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

http://www.drudgereport.com/mh.htm

ABCNEWS POLITICAL DIRECTOR MEMO SPARKS CONTROVERSY: BOTH SIDES NOT 'EQUALLY ACCOUNTABLE'

**Exclusive**

An internal memo written by ABCNEWS Political Director Mark Halperin admonishes ABC staff: During coverage of Democrat Kerry and Republican Bush not to "reflexively and artificially hold both sides 'equally' accountable."


11 posted on 10/08/2004 10:37:04 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

President Bush handled the "trick question" perfectly. Gibson is a doofus for selecting it and believing Dubya is not intelligent enough to recognize subterfuge. The Old Media are going down, one by one, and this is immensely pleasing to me.


12 posted on 10/08/2004 10:37:11 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

It reminded me of the Gwen Ifel question to Edwards: "How do you feel when Mr. Cheney attacks?"


13 posted on 10/08/2004 10:37:22 PM PDT by Deb (A Democrat Stole My GREEN Sweater!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac
"In a debate with no high points, the final question was one last chance to stump the President."

More like a booby-trap.

Dirty trick -- plain and simple, but Dubya defused it without a problem -- much to the chagrin of the reptilian Gibson and the bloated inquirer.

14 posted on 10/08/2004 10:37:30 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

How about learning how to post before putting your own thoughts where you are supposed to put the NY Times article. You make your ramblings sound like they came from the NY Times.


16 posted on 10/08/2004 10:39:09 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac
"I think President Bush sidestepped this landmine deftly, but it clearly show's a moderator bias in attempting to give Kerry a powerful parting shot"

Charlie do that? No; he just miscalculated the time; he was GOING to ask Kerry the same.

Acutally, given the question, Kerry should never had opportunity for 'his' two cents. He was not in the question. . .

21 posted on 10/08/2004 10:40:53 PM PDT by cricket (Don't lose your head. . vote Republican. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

As unprofessional and biased as that question was, Bush disarmed it with ease and without incident. It would have been a great time to toss out a line like, 'I guess you got Mark Halepin's memo', but overall Bush handled it like a pro.


24 posted on 10/08/2004 10:42:36 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Got wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

Did anyone notice the exchange between Gibson and Kerry after the debate? Fox Cable News had a shot of Gibson and Kerry walking toward each other in the crowd. Gibson seemed to have a disappointed look on his face and seemed to shrug as he looked at Kerry. Kerry looked back at Gibson without a smile. Did anyone else see this?


25 posted on 10/08/2004 10:43:14 PM PDT by crabbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

The left wing media can kiss my A$$!


27 posted on 10/08/2004 10:43:55 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

By President Bush's response, I think Gibson's little ploy backfired on him. I think we should all send him an email thanking him for making our president look good at the close of the debate - LOL!


35 posted on 10/08/2004 10:47:32 PM PDT by fellowpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac
He was just on Nightine and said how many great questions he had and how he thought that was a GREAT last question (jerk)... don't any of these people know he CAN'T answer a qustion like that. It would be in an ad tomorrow morning.

Ted Koppel was just totally rude and condensending to Karen Hughes!

36 posted on 10/08/2004 10:49:28 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac

Yes, the question was very presumptous and was designed to put Bush on the spot. But Bush handled the question brilliantly by revealing it for what it was, a loaded question. Bush said something like: "Of course the question really means why did we go to(Iraq)."


40 posted on 10/08/2004 10:51:58 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: huac; All
I believe the question wasn't intended to ask Kerry to name three things Bush has done wrong. He took it upon himself to answer the question that way. The question was directed at "you" and that "you" was only the President because of the rotation of the order as to who got asked next. It could easily have been asked of Kerry first and it would have fallen on Kerry to answer with three things he has done wrong (like voting against the first Gulf War even when Bush 41 had the Grand Alliance and had passed the "Global Test").

It reminds me of an old joke from Russia under Gorbachev. A Russian is visiting the United States. He is seeing a protestor in Lafayette Park protesting against President Reagan. His guide points out that "See, here in America we are free to publicly criticize President Reagan even in the capitol of the United States." To which the Russian tourist replies "That is nothing, we have that same freedom back in Russia. We, too are free to criticize President Reagan in our capitol city of Moscow."

The intent of the question was to ask each of them to name three things they have done wrong. It shows Kerry's low character that he named things Bush did wrong -- and it is a HUGE gaffe. But let's see how much is made of it in the Media compared to Bush's minor slip of the tongue saying "Internets."

50 posted on 10/08/2004 10:59:05 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson