Posted on 10/08/2004 3:41:56 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
I suppose that's why the democRAT socialist party loves him so much.
John Kerry - National Hero of the North Vietnamese.
If I were to speak with an abortionist I would care not for any 'good' he says he does as a doctor. My mind and my heart would continually come back to the fact that this man practiced the killing of children in a womb. Nothing else would matter. It would be like being able to carry on a friendship with Adolph Hitler winking at that nasty little vice he has of exterminating Jews.
John Kerry should be handled the same way. No-one should allow him to brush past this scandalous past as no-on should have allowed Bill Clinton to breeze by his history of raping his constituency.
Yet we have Bill O'Reilly sounding like an excited little girl at the prospect of having him in his studio for a love fest. And of course we have John Stewart reduced to a kiss-butt bowl of jello beside himself in his admiration.
Again...it would be a far different story if this were a 'publican. Look at George W. Bush. Unsubstantiated charges of receiving favoritism because his Dad (who at the time was just a member of the House I believe), understandingly I might add, lobbied for him. All based on a scandal of its own - forged documents.
JUST what would have been done to our President if he had the history Kerry had? If Dan Rather and Mary Mapes, et al, tried to turn a realtively minor issue to begin with, into a major Watergate style fiasco...JUST WHAT would they have done with a real scandal of treason?
It is my opinion they would be calling not only for his resignation but prosecution.
bump
ping
Well, Thanks...that gets my day started by being "Spring Loaded" to the PO position...
ping
I am shocked I tell you, shocked.
Kerry wouldn't aid the terrorist, would he? Is he? Why yes I think he is. How many car bombs have killed how many people just so the terrorists can try and convince the public to elect him. Food for thought.
Well let's not stop in the 70's, in the 90's it was JFKerry and John McCain that normalized relations with Vietnam and neither of them ever use that great success in their campaign speeches.
This should be the very thing that JFKerry promotes as one of his grand accomplishments and yet he never mentions it nor is he ever asked about it.
WHY????
Yes – I am a registered independent who for a long time did not care about Bush or Kerry. I don’t know about the rest of you out there – BUT I HAVE ABOUT HAD IT WITH THE DEMOCRATS & THEIR LACKEYS THE LIBERAL MEDIA’S DOG & PONEY SHOW! From now on I will refer to this “band of brothers” as DDAAMS – DisparagingDemocratsAndAllyMediaSycophants.
One can see the extent that DDAAMS has gone to in order to cross-examine every thread of evidence in Bush’s military records in search of any hint of impropriety to the claim that he served honorably and was honorably discharged. Let’s just forget for one moment about the DDAAMS philosophy that the 14 comrades who agree with Kerry are telling the truth and the 260 who disagree with him are liars. What about John Kerry’s military service?
Why hasn’t the elite media raised these questions: Why is it OK to vilify Dick Cheney for his deferments and ignore the fact that Kerry had asked for one to study in Paris?
DDAAMS is relentless in their quest to show that Bush was absent from Guard drills BUT on Jan. 3, 1970, Lt. John Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower Center in Bainbridge, Md. Therefore, there should be Performance Records for two years of obligated Ready Reserve, the 48 drills per year required and his 17 days of active duty per year training while Kerry was in the Ready Reserves. Have these records been released? Has anyone in the “Bush bashing” liberal media ever talked to Kerry's commanding officer at the Naval Reserve Center where Kerry drilled?
While DDAAMS is questioning Bush’s whereabouts when he was supposed to be serving out his obligation to his country in the Guards – Kerry was supposed to serving out his obligation to his country in the Navel Ready Reserves but instead he apparently was attending rallies where the Vietcong flag was displayed while our flag was desecrated, defiled and mocked, thereby giving aid and comfort to the enemy, and attending a meeting that where it was voted on to assassinate members of the U.S. Senate. Oh Dan Rather, watchdog of the publics’ trust – where out thou now?
While DDAAMS states that because of what Bush did during his military service he is unfit for command, they fail to realize that while Kerry was still legally an officer in the US Navy he met with the Vietnamese Communists in Paris. For this Kerry should have been court marshaled under the United States Code Of Military Justice Article 104 part 904 and should have been tried for treason under the direct violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. When is NBC going to look into this?
While DDAAMS is constant in their attacks on Bush’s honorable discharge which he did indeed receive in 1972 – the same year as Kerry should have received his too, nobody in the liberal media will question why Kerry did not receive his until March 12 2001.
I can hear it from the DDAAMS now – how dare you besmirch the noble John Kerry for trying to obtain the release of our POWs still in Vietnam. Two answers for this well versed retort from the Democratic detractors: (1) I doubt very much that I would even have the freedom right now to be writing and sharing my 1st hand thoughts with you now if every time our nation was engaged in a fight for democracy the “John Kerrys” who thought that the war this country was engaged in was wrong and took it upon themselves to cross over to the other side and secretly meet with the enemy to work out their own idea of a negotiated peace. (2) Why don’t you ask the former Vietnam POWs just how much of a positive effect John Kerry after war efforts had on their predicament?
Again I can hear the DDAAMS – “The media is not biased towards John Kerry”! Really? How can I prove that DDAAMS is slanted in their investigation of Bush’s and Kerry’s military records? By using the one of the few things that Mr. Dan Rather fears – the Vanderbilt Television News Archive. To those of you not familiar with the Vanderbilt Television News Archive, let me give you a brief synopsis.
The Television News Archive collection (http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/ ) at Vanderbilt University is the world's most available, extensive and complete archive of television news. Since 1968, the Archive has consistently recorded, indexed, and preserved network television news for research, review, and study. Every news program that has been run since 1968 has been taped, archived, and documented word for word (if you just want to read the transcripts).
According to a story in the November 1991 issue of Texas Monthly magazine, CBS anchorman Dan Rather said he lives with two burdens - the ratings and the Vanderbilt Television News Archive.
Getting back to the subject, I opened the archives and ran two queries. First I ran “Bush National Guard” and I found that since February 4th 2004 through September 14th CBS alone has ran 16 stories raising doubts about President Bush not fulfilling his obligation to the TANG. Sixteen segments in 7 and ½ months – not too aggressive I figured.
And then I ran this query “Kerry Navy Reserve” and I found that CBS had done none – zilch – nil – not a one - story questioning John Kerry’s fulfillment of duty to the Navy Reserve.
Even Ray Charles could see that DDAAMS has gone entirely out of their way, expounded enormous amounts of resources, and wasted away who knows how much time to vilify President Bush, but at the same time have taken a laissez faire attitude when it comes to John Kerry.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when it is that we try to deceive! Both Democrats and Republicans reiterate that this election will come down to which side can convince the undecided voters who is and who isn’t telling them the truth. In my view – the Democrats can get on the first stage out of town and take the liberal DDAAMS with them.
Keep in mind that, to Kerry, meeting with the enemy,
and testifying about 'American autrocities', was
a means to an end. If Kerry had never spoke
about war crimes, we would never had heard of him.
Doing what the enemy wanted --> good political
strategy for Massachusetts in the '70s, and '80s.
Mr. KERRY. My feeling, Senator, is undoubtedly this Congress, and I don't mean to sound pessimistic, but I do hot believe that this congress will, in fact, end the war as we would like to, which is immediately and unilaterally and, therefore, if I were to speak I would say we would set a date and the date obviously would be the earliest possible date. But I would like to say, in answering that, that I do not believe it is necessary to stall any longer.
I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam [Hanoi Communists, ed.] and the Provisional Revolutionary Government [Viet Cong, ed.] and of all eight of Madam Binh's points [Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Viet Cong Foreign Minister, ed.] it has been stated time and time again,... if the United States were to set a date for withdrawal the prisoners of war would be returned. I think this negates very clearly the argument of the President that we have to maintain a presence in Vietnam, to use as a negotiating block for the return of those prisoners. The setting of a date will accomplish that.
I got this excerpt from wintersoldier.com
Kerry’s Soviet Rhetoric The Vietnam-era antiwar movement got its spin from the Kremlin.
Ping for your attention....
"Yes – I am a registered independent who for a long time did not care about Bush or Kerry. I don’t know about the rest of you out there – BUT I HAVE ABOUT HAD IT WITH THE DEMOCRATS & THEIR LACKEYS THE LIBERAL MEDIA’S DOG & PONEY SHOW! From now on I will refer to this “band of brothers” as DDAAMS – DisparagingDemocratsAndAllyMediaSycophants. "
"IF" you are old enough to remember the 60's and 70's then you are seeing the continuation of that method of operation.
Nixon was taken down from within and without and these of this ideology have never come down from that "high". That is not to say Nixon did not have his faults, but it was his faults that these of the leftist ideology "we are gods" and the sleeping, go along to get along Republicans allowed, a media driven coup.
Today Nixon looks like a saint in contrast to the Clintons, algore, and most of all JFKerry.
JFKerry is embolden by what he did during that timeframe and he knew without a doubt that the so called "free" press would cover his backside, while he once again stuck his finger in we Americans eye.
Yes I am old enough to remember the 60's & 70's.
I wonder how many people realize that one of the things working for "slick Willie" during the impeachment process is that he had experience on his side.
During the Nixon impeachment there really weren’t too many impeachment cases to use as a guideline. Those who were working on the case had to "wing it" as they went along. The one thing they did know however is that the legal proceedings that they crafted against Nixon would give them great on the job training and inside experience if they ever had to use it again.
Oh - one of the lawyers working on the Nixon case just happened to be a young "eager beaver" right out of college by the name of Hillary Rodham.
Yes indeed.
More excellent work from Dr. Corsi... thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.