Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Despite what the New York Times says (I guess they didn't bother to read the report) the Iraqi Intelligence Service (ISS) maintained a biological and chemical weapons program during the 1990's and early 2000's. The weapons were tested on humans. The obvious implication, which the report does not mention, is that these weapons would have been ideally suited to the needs of terrorists. Oddly, the report concludes that there was "no evidence" that these programs were for "military use." Such an absurd parsing is contradicted by the evidence listed; apparently, intelligence operations are not "military" in character. The Key Findings are summarized in a 20 page report provided at the link. It's a pdf, so it may load slowly. Read the entire thing.
1 posted on 10/07/2004 9:30:59 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mia T

fyi


2 posted on 10/07/2004 9:32:06 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Did Saddam Fail Global Test by violating 1441 with it's zero tolerance clause??? Inquiring liberals don't want to know!


3 posted on 10/07/2004 9:35:26 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Interviews with key IIS offi cials within and outside of M16 yielded very little information about the IIS’ activities in this area.

Murder a few, the rest shut up.

4 posted on 10/07/2004 9:35:52 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Well, one source said they don't, another says they do.

My gut says they do, and I'm trusting my gut.


6 posted on 10/07/2004 9:37:01 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

bump for a later read


7 posted on 10/07/2004 9:37:39 AM PDT by Mo1 (The President's job is not to pass a global test, but to protect the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
The weapons were tested on humans.

Somehow, i'm guessing these tests didn't exactly meet the ethical or procedural standards of an FDA Phase II clinical trial.

8 posted on 10/07/2004 9:41:45 AM PDT by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Lots to bookmark today! WHeee!

As a side note, does ANYONE need any more evidence of liberal bias in the media, after the events of even just today?!? ALL the media is shouting "No WMD's No WMD's, Bush Lied People died!", all the while IGNORING all of this OTHER stuff! Cripes, it's like the old saying, "I used to have to walk to school uphill, both ways!", dealing with the media in this country! Sheesh!


9 posted on 10/07/2004 9:43:02 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
WTF why isn't this being reported by the MSM?

I think I know the answer.
10 posted on 10/07/2004 9:43:18 AM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
report concludes that there was

"no evidence" that these programs were for "military use.

These programs where used to develop better condiments

11 posted on 10/07/2004 9:43:20 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

bookmark


12 posted on 10/07/2004 9:44:20 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Under the aegis of the intelligence service, a secretive team developed assassination instruments using poisons or toxins for the Iraqi state. A small group of scientists, doctors and technicians conducted secret experiments on human beings, resulting in their deaths. The aim was probably the development of poisons, including ricin and afl atoxin to eliminate or debilitate the Regime’s opponents. It appears that testing on humans continued until the mid 1990s.
That's strange. The SD Union Tribune today told me on its front page this morning that NO IRAQI WMD since 1991. A UN Weapons Inspector says so, so it must be true.

It seems testing biological "toxins" on humans isn't considered WMD because... they didn't shoot missiles at them to test it?

Oh, one other question? Does this mean the Democrats will shut up about how we didn't find any WMD yet in Iraq (which we have) because Clinton "must've destroyed them in the bombings in 1998"? After all, if Saddam destroyed his own weapons in 1991, I guess Clinton really did bomb an aspirin factory and a baby formula factory.

13 posted on 10/07/2004 9:46:04 AM PDT by cgk (Calling it MemoGate is like saying Watergate had something to do w/ Water: WhistlingPasttheGraveyard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito; Lando Lincoln; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; MistyCA; MeekOneGOP; Grampa Dave; ...

BTTT


15 posted on 10/07/2004 9:58:16 AM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vic3O3; cavtrooper21

WMD ping for the archives.

Semper Fi


16 posted on 10/07/2004 10:06:54 AM PDT by dd5339 (A sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero's path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Salman Pak, Salman Pak.

Now where have I heard that name before?


18 posted on 10/07/2004 11:59:11 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson