Skip to comments.
Flame Proof - Starlite (can withstand temperatures of 2,700 degrees Centigrade)
alternative science ^
Posted on 10/06/2004 8:37:50 AM PDT by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
Too hot to handle
In April 1993, the defence magazine Jane's International Defence Review announced the discovery by a British amateur inventor, Maurice Ward, of a thin plastic coating able to withstand temperatures of 2,700 degrees Centigrade
The reason why it was a defence magazine who first published news of This revolutionary invention is that the coating is so resistant to heat that it can make tanks, ships and aircraft impervious to the effects of nuclear weapons at quite close range -- and hence is of great interest to the military mind.
A little later that year the whole nation had an opportunity to see for themselves the effectiveness of Maurice Ward's new paint on BBC Television when it was featured on "Tomorrow's World". Presenter Michael Rodd showed viewers an ordinary chicken's egg that had been painted with the new coating. The paint was so thin it was not visible. Rodd then dramatically donned welder's visor and gauntlets, lit up an oxyacetylene torch, and played the flame directly onto the egg for several minutes.
When he removed the flame, and cracked the egg on the table top, viewers were able to see that the coating was so heat resistant that the egg was still raw and had not even begun to cook.
This invention, a simple paint that can render anything impervious to very high temperatures, has been the holy grail of chemical research for more than fifty years. Teams of scientists in the world's greatest industrial and defence laboratories have poured billions of pounds and hundreds of man-years into the search for such a substance -- a quest which made Ward's discovery even more extraordinary.
Ward's invention is remarkable enough, but the story of how he came to make it, and the resistance he encountered in getting anyone to believe him, is even more remarkable.
Maurice Ward comes from Blackburn and has no professional scientific background. The closest he has come to the chemical industry was when, as a young man, he drove a fork lift truck in the warehouse of ICI. For the past two decades, he has earned a living as a ladies hairdresser.
Part of his income was derived from selling his customers hair preparations such as shampoo, conditioner and hairspray. To maximise his income he rented a small workshop, bought standard chemicals and mixed and bottled his own brand hair products.
In the best traditions of Ealing Comedy, it was when playing around mixing up chemicals in his 'skunk works' that Ward stumbled on the formula that had eluded the finest minds in chemical research.
Realising at once the value of his invention, Ward wrote to Britain's major chemical companies, offering to demonstrate his material to them. Every one sent him the standard brush-off letter they send to cranks and crackpots. After the "Tomorrow's World" demonstration, Ward stopped getting the brush-off and starting getting offers instead.
One consequence of his contacts with chemical companies was that the head of research of ICI's paint laboratory left the firm and went into partnership with Ward to exploit the discovery commercially.
One other interesting consequence is that the large corporations who had rejected his initial approaches in such a knee-jerk fashion, conducted internal inquests to find out what had gone wrong, both with their own research and with their dealings with the outside world.
On the face of it, it was perfectly understandable that Ward's claims should be ignored since he was merely an amateur, with no scientific training and no track record in research.
ICI's own paints laboratory held an internal audit and what they found puts this claim in an entirely different light. For the audit showed that the most scientifically qualified of its research chemists had contributed to the least number of patents, and the fewer scientific qualifications the staff possessed, the greater the number of patents they had contributed to. In the most striking case of all, the person who had contributed to most ICI's patents had no scientific qualifications at all.
It seems that Maurice Ward's greatest strength as a researcher was that he had not been taught how to think.
In the light of examples such as this, the phrase 'Alternative Science' seems less a contradiction in terms and more a harbinger of something that professional science is likely to see more and more of in future.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: flameproof; miltech; space; starlite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
21
posted on
10/06/2004 8:53:55 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
Wow...very cool. This sounds like the ideal paint for the Space Shuttle and reentry vehicles.
22
posted on
10/06/2004 8:56:57 AM PDT
by
Sender
(It is not their patriotism, but their judgment, that is so sorely lacking. -Zell Miller)
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
For the audit showed that the most scientifically qualified of its research chemists had contributed to the least number of patents, and the fewer scientific qualifications the staff possessed, the greater the number of patents they had contributed to. In the most striking case of all, the person who had contributed to most ICI's patents had no scientific qualifications at all. LOL! Reminds me of Milton Friedman's quip that "when you pay for research, that's exactly what you'll get."
The alternative: offer rewards for specific results.
23
posted on
10/06/2004 8:58:00 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
Starlite seems to have insulated itself from success. It certainly isn't burning up google.
24
posted on
10/06/2004 8:59:02 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: PatrickHenry
25
posted on
10/06/2004 9:00:48 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: Aquinasfan
Where is that quote from ...
For the audit showed that the most scientifically
26
posted on
10/06/2004 9:07:41 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: Red Badger
Won't itch nearly as bad either!
27
posted on
10/06/2004 9:16:58 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Scythian
In 1993 viewers of the BBC's Tomorrow's World were treated to a curious sight. Presenter Michael Rodd donned a welding mask and gloves, fired up an oxyacetylene torch and used it to attack an apparently ordinary egg. After four minutes the egg was cracked open to reveal its interior, still raw and runny. The secret? A thin coating of Starlite, a miraculous, heat-proof substance invented by a middle-aged hairdresser from Blackburn.
Maurice Ward had no scientific background. He did like to tinker, however, and inside his rented workshop he created his own brand of hair products, using ordinary chemicals and a food mixer. He stumbled upon Starlite and its heat-proof properties by accident and, realising that he had something special on his hands, began contacting chemical companies.
At first Ward was dismissed as a crackpot inventor, but following a brief mention in Jane's International Defence Review and the Tomorrow's World demonstration, defence and chemical companies took notice. More articles in intelligence and business journals followed, reporting that Starlite had withstood a simulated 10,000 C nuclear blast and shrugged off a high-powered laser beam.
Countless applications could be imagined for this tough, lightweight material: from ship, aircraft and spacecraft design to body armour and kitchen equipment. Concerned that a corporate giant would steal his recipe, Ward refused to patent his invention, revealing only that it contained 21 components, mostly organic polymers, borates and ceramics.
Rumours soon circulated. Some said bidders included Nasa and the US department of energy, others said the plans had been stolen and a secret factory was producing Starlite for the US government while other governments had tried in vain to replicate the mixture. There was talk of billion-dollar buyouts, stockmarket flotations, even a Maurice Ward Starlite Technology Centre staffed by Nasa employees. Then everything went quiet.
The last word was in 1997, when a spokesman announced that Ward was close to a major deal with an aircraft interiors manufacturer. Ward was then enjoying his new hobby - harness racing. By 2002 his horses were still running. But whatever happened to Starlite?
Vanishing Starlite
Rest assured, the US has it !!
28
posted on
10/06/2004 9:18:21 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: BenLurkin
You ain't kidding! It weighs practically nothing and protects wonderfully. Fragile spun glass tiles like on the shuttle and ablative heat shields would be a thing of the past. Of course more tests have to be run though, like how does it handle re-entry at 17,000 mph; will it have enough adhesive power to keep from getting torn off the spacecraft.
29
posted on
10/06/2004 9:20:29 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
See post #28
Then everything went quiet.
30
posted on
10/06/2004 9:24:35 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
To: Bikers4Bush
It would be helpful to a lot of things. Like what would happen to engine parts if you were able to coat them with this material, heatless friction.IF,,,this substance is what it claims, and if it can be produced at a reasonable cost, it will revolutionize a huge number of things. The number of applications would be enormous.
32
posted on
10/06/2004 9:40:14 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(When your circus has a big tent, you can fit a lot of clowns inside)
To: quietolong
33
posted on
10/06/2004 9:45:40 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
34
posted on
10/06/2004 9:47:33 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
Flame Proof - Starlite (can withstand temperatures of 2,700 degrees Centigrade) That's all well and good, but I don't think it will help with the flames that result when somebody posts a mainstream American opinion on DU.
35
posted on
10/06/2004 9:49:23 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(I put sentences together suspiciously well for a righty blogger.)
To: steve-b
Burley Products claims to be working with the inventor and has the formula, my guess is this is a scam to trick folks into investing, but check out their site
http://www.burleyproducts.com/
36
posted on
10/06/2004 9:54:54 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: js1138
Starlite seems to have insulated itself from success. It certainly isn't burning up google.It's being tested in a Tippy-Top Secret program on The Dark Side of the Sun.
37
posted on
10/06/2004 9:56:49 AM PDT
by
LTCJ
(CBS, all your Boyd Cycles are belong to us.)
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
ICI's own paints laboratory held an internal audit and what they found puts this claim in an entirely different light. For the audit showed that the most scientifically qualified of its research chemists had contributed to the least number of patents, and the fewer scientific qualifications the staff possessed, the greater the number of patents they had contributed to. In the most striking case of all, the person who had contributed to most ICI's patents had no scientific qualifications at all.
It seems that Maurice Ward's greatest strength as a researcher was that he had not been taught how to think.
No, wrong conclusion. The more senior scientists are used to perform the more bureaucratic functions of the enterprise. The less senior scientists are those who are still in the labs doing the work. It's no wonder that someone who has been removed from the day to day experimental work would not be coming up with patentable ideas.
38
posted on
10/06/2004 10:04:35 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
In April 1993, the defence magazine Jane's International Defence Review announced the discovery by a British amateur inventor, Maurice Ward, of a thin plastic coating able to withstand temperatures of 2,700 degrees Centigrade
And in the intervening 11 years we've seen a giant spate of new products and processes based on this discovery.
39
posted on
10/06/2004 10:05:34 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ..
Well, does this have SPACE SHUTTLE applications?
40
posted on
10/06/2004 10:07:06 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
(RE-READ,starting on page 16, THE CONNECTION........RE: CHENEY-IRAQ/ al-Qaida LINK)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson