Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Kerry Misleading Public On Stem-Cell Issue
AP ^ | 10/4

Posted on 10/04/2004 3:36:40 PM PDT by ambrose

TheIowaChannel.com

Bush: Kerry Misleading Public On Stem-Cell Issue

Kerry Promises $100 Million Per Year For Stem-Cell Research

POSTED: 5:34 PM EDT October 4, 2004

Sen. John Kerry said it's time Americans had a president who thinks the way they do about stem-cell research.

At a town meeting in Hampton, N.H., the Democratic presidential nominee accused President George W. Bush of being close-minded on the issue, saying Bush is "stubborn, he's out of touch, he's unwilling to change." Kerry said Bush has chosen "to sacrifice science for right wing ideology."

Kerry is promising $100 million a year for stem-cell research and strict ethical oversight. He was introduced by actor Michael J. Fox, a stem-cell activist who has Parkinson's disease. Many scientists believe stem cells hold promise for treating diseases including Parkinson's.

The controversial practice uses days-old human embryos to grow new cells. Since the embryos are destroyed after the cells are extracted, some religious and conservative organizations liken it to abortion.

The president has limited federal funding for stem cell research to 78 embryonic stem-cell lines that were in existence when he issued his executive order on Aug. 9, 2001. But only about 21 of those original stem cell lines may actually be available to researchers due to ownership and other problems.

The Bush-Cheney campaign accused Kerry of misleading the public, saying the Democratic nominee is attacking a research ban "that doesn't exist." Spokesman Steve Schmidt said Bush's decision shows the government's commitment to using stem-cell research in an ethical way.

Bush Blasts Kerry, Who Leads In New Poll

Bush is attacking Kerry on several other fronts as he campaigns in Iowa -- a state the president narrowly lost four years ago.

Bush first signed an extension of several middle class tax cuts and charged Kerry voted against them.

Kerry's campaign says the Democrat's tax cut package would do even more for middle-class Americans.

Bush also charged that Kerry wants to nationalize health care. He said Kerry favors a system "that's creeping toward Hillary care." That's a reference to the New York senator's effort as first lady to establish a nationwide health care system.

Bush also warned a crowd of 3,000 supporters that Kerry's plans to combat terrorism are "dangerous to world peace."

Bush's appearance in Iowa was his 17th in the state.

Meanwhile, Kerry stumped in New Hampshire and Pennsylvania on Monday, cheered by new polls showing he has erased the lead Bush held through much of September.

A Newsweek poll actually had Kerry ahead, though by less than the margin of error. A CNN/USA Today poll following Thursday's debate has the two candidates dead even.

Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter paraphrases Mark Twain, saying, "Reports of our demise were somewhat exaggerated."

In Philadelphia, Kerry has blasted the Bush Administration's faith-based initiatives while meeting with a group of about 100 African-American church leaders from across the country.

Kerry says people of faith have helped those in need for years and years, "there just hasn't always been an effort to politicize it." Kerry says the Bush administration acts as if it invented the concept of "faith based initiatives" and it "is trying to use it to divide" people.

Kerry was joined at the meeting by the Rev. Jesse Jackson and former presidential candidate, the Rev. Al Sharpton. After his initial statements, Kerry's meeting was closed to the press, so ministers could "speak more freely."

On Sunday, at a church in Cleveland, he warned the GOP is trying to suppress the black vote. He said his campaign is enlisting lawyers to fight the efforts, saying "memories of 2000" are strong.



TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2004 3:36:40 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Kerry is a serial liar.


2 posted on 10/04/2004 3:39:26 PM PDT by syriacus (A vote for John Kerry is a vote for a well-manicured gas bag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Amazing! I just saw a talking head from 'American Enterprise Institute" on a balanced report on ABC, explaining that there is no "ban." Who'd a thunk it?


3 posted on 10/04/2004 3:39:39 PM PDT by Dutchgirl (Burma shave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Here is a good article on this very subject:

Of Stem Cells and Fairy Tales
Of Stem Cells and Fairy Tales
Scientists who have been telling Nancy Reagan that embryonic stem cell research could cure Alzheimer's now admit that it isn't true.
by Wesley J. Smith
06/10/2004 3:00:00 PM
Increase Font Size
Printer-Friendly



Email a Friend
Respond to this article








"PEOPLE NEED A FAIRY TALE," Ronald D.G. McKay, a stem cell researcher at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, told Washington Post reporter Rick Weiss, explaining why scientists have allowed society to believe wrongly that stem cells are likely to effectively treat Alzheimer's disease. "Maybe that's unfair, but they need a story line that's relatively simple to understand."

Or maybe Big Biotech needs access to taxpayer dollars to fund embryonic stem cell and cloning research--private investors generally give companies engaged in these endeavors a cold shoulder--and they are using famous grief stricken families like the Reagans to do their political lifting. If true, it demonstrates a depth of insincerity and disingenuousness that is as cruel as it is unjustifiable.

Here's the story: Researchers have apparently known for some time that embryonic stem cells will not be an effective treatment for Alzheimer's, because as two researchers told a Senate subcommittee in May, it is a "whole brain disease," rather than a cellular disorder (such as Parkinson's). This has generally been kept out of the news. But now, Washington Post correspondent Rick Weiss, has blown the lid off of the scam, reporting that while useful abstract information might be gleaned about Alzheimer's through embryonic stem cell research, "stem cell experts confess . . . that of all the diseases that may be someday cured by embryonic stem cell treatments, Alzheimer's is among the least likely to benefit."

But people like Nancy Reagan have been allowed to believe otherwise, "a distortion"
Weiss writes that "is not being aggressively corrected by scientists." Why? The false story line helps generate public support for the biotech political agenda. As Weiss noted, "It [Nancy Reagan's statement in support of ESCR] is the kind of advocacy that researchers have craved for years, and none wants to slow its momentum."

This is a scandal. Misrepresentation by omission corrupts one of the primary purposes of science, which is to provide society objective information about the state of scientific knowledge without regard to the political consequences. Such data then serves as a foundation for crucial moral analysis about whether and how controversial fields of scientific inquiry should be regulated, a debate in which all are entitled to participate. But we can't do so intelligently if we are not told the truth.

Some scientists have become alarmed by how politicized science has become. As Roger Pielke, Jr., Director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado warned two years ago in the prestigious science journal Nature, "Many scientists [now] willingly adopt tactics of demagoguery and character assassination as well as, or even instead of, reasoned argument," in promoting their views. This politicization of science, he worried, has led some scientists, "not to mention lawyers and those with commercial interests," to "manipulate 'facts' to support" their advocacy, "undermining the scientific community's ability to advise policy makers." Consequently, he warned, science "is becoming yet another playing field for power politics, complete with the trappings of political spin and a win-at-all-costs attitude."




CONTINUED
1 2 Next >
Print This Article





Respond to this article Subscribe to the magazine







Search Subscribe Subscribers Only FAQ Store Newsletter
Web Links Contact About Us Services Site Map Privacy Policy Voter Services

© Copyright 2004, News Corporation, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.






Kerry Accepted Money from Partial-Birth Abortionists, Report Says
(CNSNews.com) - Three abortionists specializing in partial-birth abortion contributed a total of $7,000 to the campaign for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, the Weekly Standard reports. Read News on the Web


4 posted on 10/04/2004 3:40:25 PM PDT by 2ThumbsUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Stem Cells? There are Terrorists out there plotting how to Kill American Civilians, Iran is developing a Nuke, NOrrth Korea is testing missles in the Pacific and Kerry is worried about Stem Cells? MAN, everytime he opens his mouth Kerry shows even MORE reason why he is unfit to be President!


5 posted on 10/04/2004 3:41:44 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We have solutions, not slogans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Stem cell research is the new snake oil. You can promise cures for anything and credible people will believe you.


6 posted on 10/04/2004 3:49:20 PM PDT by jwalburg (Daschle election gear: http://www.cafepress.com/southdakotapdq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

if embryonic stem cell research had any potential, the drug companies would be pumping millions into it. They're not.


7 posted on 10/04/2004 3:53:28 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As a biological scientist I am certain stem cell research will eventually provide undreamed of advances in medicine. As a human,- I hate the moral issues of humans breeding to provide research material to use to get to those advances.

But, the fact remains, President Bush's position does not ban stem cell research in any way. He has only stopped federal funds from being spent on the development and research on new cell lines. My understanding is that biotech companies are in no way restricted in their research direction. And this is as it should be.

The companies will eventually develop the advances. They will pay the bills entailed in proving safety and efficacy, and they will market the products and make big bucks. At the same time they will be harassed by Tort lawyers (like "senator" Edwards) and spend big bucks defending themselves.
8 posted on 10/04/2004 3:56:58 PM PDT by Boiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

He's directly referencing Hillary-care? LOL!

Okay, all of you that spent the weekend focused on what Bush should have said, I think he heard you. It sounds like he's changed his stump speech, probably a warm up for later in the week.


9 posted on 10/04/2004 4:23:09 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

That is what I heard from the begining. I learned it here on FR.


10 posted on 10/04/2004 4:35:20 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boiler
As a biological scientist I am certain stem cell research will eventually provide undreamed of advances in medicine. As a human,- I hate the moral issues of humans breeding to provide research material to use to get to those advances.

What reason is there to believe that embryonic stem cells will have any useful feature not found in some other sorts?

It seems to me that the "design purpose" of an embryonic stem cell is to spontaneously produce many different kids of cells, while the purpose of other (seemingly more useful) stem cells is to be directable to produce lots of one kind of cell. A newly-conceived embryo won't have anything external to control what its stem cells produce, so its stem cells must necessarily 'do their own thing'. But for all the therapies I know of, cells which respond to external direction are much more useful than those that direct themselves internally.

11 posted on 10/04/2004 4:47:16 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Thank you for the response. I am to posting here. But what a great site this is! I posted it because (now that the election is around the corner) I am noticing the topic coming up again. And in case someone didn't see this article, it is a good one to have on hand for people who are concerned with this. I am with the other folks who feel there are a many more pressing worries, than this one. But it's good to be prepared for everything.


12 posted on 10/04/2004 4:54:48 PM PDT by 2ThumbsUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boiler

Why does this acticle not mention the distinction between embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells?

In fact adult stem cells were not mentioned in the article at all. From my understanding, embryonic stem cells have achieved no successful usage, whereas adult stem cells, from umbilical cord blood for example, have seen success.

This is a critical distinction and I believe it shows the mindset of the folks pushing embryonic stem cells. They support abortion and cannot allow this restriction, otherwise we head down the "slippery slope" back to sanity and restrictions on abortion.


13 posted on 10/04/2004 4:58:54 PM PDT by Freakazoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I am very pleased to see the Bush campaign strike back today on this.

Poor Stephanie Cutter, did she see the Pew and WaPo polls come out?


14 posted on 10/04/2004 5:03:29 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
Okay, all of you that spent the weekend focused on what Bush should have said, I think he heard you. It sounds like he's changed his stump speech, probably a warm up for later in the week.

Fox played a clip of President Bush at a rally today and a lady in the audience said "You sound great. Please at the next debate tell that opponent you have everything you said here today". President Bush said he would!

15 posted on 10/04/2004 5:05:37 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

=== if embryonic stem cell research had any potential, the drug companies would be pumping millions into it. They're not.


No, the government is ... courtesy of our Pro-Life President who neatly DOUBLED the budget of the NIH and, with his decision on stem cells, obviated the need for them to term stem cell research "human research" since a new window of Non-Personhood had been nailed wide open.

I guess the folks we really have to thank, however, are the forward-looking GOP -- like George's Dad, then Rep. Bush and head of the GOP task force on "Earth Resources & Population" -- for establishing in 1970 a "right" to predetermine the sex of one's children.

Without this new "Right," we'd never have been in the business of profiteer third-party sex partners to ensure that homosexuals and sterile heteros alike could overcome the limits of Evolution and assure us the means for that "Great Leap Forward" only dreamt of by ardent eugenicits like the Harrimans and their business partners among the heart of the American Eugenics Society at New Haven.


16 posted on 10/04/2004 5:12:13 PM PDT by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
It's the "HEY ... Gore STOLE my idea on faithbased partnerships!" schtick all over again. Thank goodness for tried and true sticky wickets like abortion and the Viet Nam war. Who knew those 30-year old scabs still could be picked to bleed on cue?
17 posted on 10/04/2004 5:14:01 PM PDT by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

bttt!


18 posted on 10/04/2004 5:16:37 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

LOL!!! Do you happen to remember if that clip was run on a show that will be repeated tonight? I'd love to see it.


19 posted on 10/04/2004 5:58:23 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker; EllaMinnow

I would think so. Ella, was that lady at the rally shown during Brit's "Special Report"?


20 posted on 10/04/2004 6:00:11 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson