Skip to comments.
Newsweek Manufactures Momentum
RealClear Politics ^
| 10/2/04
| jwalsh07
Posted on 10/02/2004 3:56:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07
Poll Date...Pubbies....Dems....Indies....Men....Women
.
.
9/11/04........391........300......270......481....522
10/2/04........345........364......278......481....532
On 9/11/04 Newsweek published a poll showing Bush up 49-43. On 10/2/04 Newsweek published a poll showing Kerry up 47-45.
Here's a test, you tell me why.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; deceit; fabrication; liberalmedia; medialies; mediashillsforkerry; momentum; newsweak; newsweek; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
1
posted on
10/02/2004 3:56:53 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Here's a test, you tell me why. They put some special sauce in the poll sample.
2
posted on
10/02/2004 3:58:47 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
To: jwalsh07
Looks to me like they oversampled Pubbies in the September poll, so they could correct the sampling error to produce an automatic gain for Kerry in the October poll, right after the debate.
Figures don't lie, but liars figure.... or
There's lies, damn lies, and statistics
To: jwalsh07
Attention Mainstream Press. A poll as phony as the NG documents.
4
posted on
10/02/2004 3:59:18 PM PDT
by
ez
(TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
To: Enlightiator
Enlightiator deserves thanks for posting this info on another thread but I think it deserves its own thread. Hopefully the admin folks agree.
5
posted on
10/02/2004 3:59:59 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
To: jwalsh07
Here's a test, you tell me why.You go first.
6
posted on
10/02/2004 4:00:46 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
To: jwalsh07
a 20% increase in the number of demonrats....
To: jwalsh07
More DemocRATS! Plus this is a push pull. They asked first who won the debate, Kerry, etc. Then asked, who would you vote for Prez.
But my club is getting very full now.
Keep an eye on Gallup.
8
posted on
10/02/2004 4:01:10 PM PDT
by
COURAGE
(A charter member of the Grim FReeper Club)
To: ez
Where are those bloggers? This deception should be tomorrow's subject.
9
posted on
10/02/2004 4:01:21 PM PDT
by
ez
(TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
To: jwalsh07
In last month's poll they oversampled Republicans. In this month's poll, they oversampled Democrats. Newsweek and the partisan media are being too clever by half in subtly changing weighed partisan affiliation stats to get the results they want. In this case, to provide fodder for the discovery Kerry has managed to "tighten up the race." Like I'm shocked this would happen. They're all in the tank for Kerry and have been from Day One.
10
posted on
10/02/2004 4:01:43 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: jwalsh07
Where did you find the internals? I went to the site and didn't know where to look.
11
posted on
10/02/2004 4:02:18 PM PDT
by
dawn53
To: jwalsh07
I noticed the big number of GOP members polled in the first poll and was very suspicious. Now they have gone the other way. Obviously, the latest poll is going to swing to wards the Democrats. I am waiting for someone that is an expert to tell me what this all means. If they had the same number of GOP members in the second poll Bush would have been up may be even bigger than in the first poll.
To: ez
We already dispelled this NewsWeak garbage earlier today. I for one am not sweating this one. Kerry just made it to the bell but he will be coming out for round two on week legs. My prediction, KO for GWB in the next debate.
13
posted on
10/02/2004 4:02:55 PM PDT
by
lt.america
(Captain was already taken)
To: jwalsh07
Notice how the Men column has the same percentage?!! The rest is just special EVILISH sauce....THE RATS BETTER NOT CELEBRATE TOOOOO SOON...This poll is RIGGED!! Bawhahahahhahha!!
To: COURAGE
Plus this is a push pull. They asked first who won the debate, Kerry, etc. Then asked, who would you vote for Prez. Exactly.
15
posted on
10/02/2004 4:02:57 PM PDT
by
gilliam
To: jwalsh07
Looks like dan rather conducted this poll, maybe back in 1972 on his PC.
To: Reagan Man
You go first.I thought I did.
17
posted on
10/02/2004 4:03:39 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
To: jwalsh07
From Tim Graham at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/graham200410011024.asp
"Shortly before the debate began, Newsweek national editor Jon Meacham suggested on MSNBC that journalists are tired of Bush being in the lead, and so will try to narrow the race. Meacham foresaw "the possibility that President Bush has peaked about a month too early. Because we all need a narrative to change." Chris Matthews asked: "Is that your prediction?" Meacham replied: "I think it's possible that we're gonna be sitting around saying, 'Well you know Kerry really surprised us.' Because in a way the imperative is to change the story." "
Nuff said?
18
posted on
10/02/2004 4:04:23 PM PDT
by
jackbill
To: jwalsh07
Newsweek is not a credible source.
RCP Average 9/22 - 10/2 48.7% 44.3% 2.0% Bush +4.4
Newsweek (1013 RV) 9/30 - 10/2 45% 47% 2% Kerry +2 LA Times (1100 LV) 9/25 - 9/28 51% 45% 2% Bush +6 CNN/USAT/Gallup (758 LV) 9/24 - 9/26 52% 44% 3% Bush +8 IBD/TIPP (649 LV) 9/22 - 9/27 45% 45% 2% TIE ABC News/WP (810 LV) 9/23 - 9/26 51% 45% 1% Bush +6 Pew Research (948 RV) 9/22 - 9/26 48% 40% 2% Bush +8
Rasmussen has Bush ahead by 3.
Electoral College Bush 213...Kerry 169 The Dems more than likely filled the poll. Even AOL polled today and showed Bush the winner...shrug.
19
posted on
10/02/2004 4:04:41 PM PDT
by
xtinct
(I was the kid next door's imaginary friend. Doing my best to piss the liberal heathen off.)
To: All
Folks,
I am a frequent poster and have an ancient sign up date. This is not contrived negativism, and it's not even critical of Bush.
It is not clear that ANY polls target a partisan mix, other than Rasmussen and Zogby. They can't. This partisan mix result could be self identified.
Meaning, they could call at random and simply ask if the person is GOP or Dem. This would then be the result the random calling got. The questions would be "Are you registered? What party are you registered as? Who would you vote for today?"
This would mean the partisan mix is self identified.
Most of the pollsters do not aim at any mix, with the exception of Rasmussen.
20
posted on
10/02/2004 4:05:14 PM PDT
by
Owen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson