Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Manufactures Momentum
RealClear Politics ^ | 10/2/04 | jwalsh07

Posted on 10/02/2004 3:56:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07

Poll Date...Pubbies....Dems....Indies....Men....Women

.
.
9/11/04........391........300......270......481....522
10/2/04........345........364......278......481....532

On 9/11/04 Newsweek published a poll showing Bush up 49-43. On 10/2/04 Newsweek published a poll showing Kerry up 47-45.

Here's a test, you tell me why.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; deceit; fabrication; liberalmedia; medialies; mediashillsforkerry; momentum; newsweak; newsweek; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2004 3:56:53 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Here's a test, you tell me why.

They put some special sauce in the poll sample.

2 posted on 10/02/2004 3:58:47 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Looks to me like they oversampled Pubbies in the September poll, so they could correct the sampling error to produce an automatic gain for Kerry in the October poll, right after the debate.

Figures don't lie, but liars figure.... or
There's lies, damn lies, and statistics


3 posted on 10/02/2004 3:59:15 PM PDT by BreitbartSentMe (Now EX-Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Attention Mainstream Press. A poll as phony as the NG documents.


4 posted on 10/02/2004 3:59:18 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightiator

Enlightiator deserves thanks for posting this info on another thread but I think it deserves its own thread. Hopefully the admin folks agree.


5 posted on 10/02/2004 3:59:59 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Here's a test, you tell me why.

You go first.

6 posted on 10/02/2004 4:00:46 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

a 20% increase in the number of demonrats....


7 posted on 10/02/2004 4:00:53 PM PDT by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
More DemocRATS! Plus this is a push pull. They asked first who won the debate, Kerry, etc. Then asked, who would you vote for Prez.

But my club is getting very full now.

Keep an eye on Gallup.

8 posted on 10/02/2004 4:01:10 PM PDT by COURAGE (A charter member of the Grim FReeper Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Where are those bloggers? This deception should be tomorrow's subject.


9 posted on 10/02/2004 4:01:21 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
In last month's poll they oversampled Republicans. In this month's poll, they oversampled Democrats. Newsweek and the partisan media are being too clever by half in subtly changing weighed partisan affiliation stats to get the results they want. In this case, to provide fodder for the discovery Kerry has managed to "tighten up the race." Like I'm shocked this would happen. They're all in the tank for Kerry and have been from Day One.
10 posted on 10/02/2004 4:01:43 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Where did you find the internals? I went to the site and didn't know where to look.


11 posted on 10/02/2004 4:02:18 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I noticed the big number of GOP members polled in the first poll and was very suspicious. Now they have gone the other way. Obviously, the latest poll is going to swing to wards the Democrats. I am waiting for someone that is an expert to tell me what this all means. If they had the same number of GOP members in the second poll Bush would have been up may be even bigger than in the first poll.
12 posted on 10/02/2004 4:02:29 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
We already dispelled this NewsWeak garbage earlier today. I for one am not sweating this one. Kerry just made it to the bell but he will be coming out for round two on week legs. My prediction, KO for GWB in the next debate.
13 posted on 10/02/2004 4:02:55 PM PDT by lt.america (Captain was already taken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Notice how the Men column has the same percentage?!! The rest is just special EVILISH sauce....THE RATS BETTER NOT CELEBRATE TOOOOO SOON...This poll is RIGGED!! Bawhahahahhahha!!


14 posted on 10/02/2004 4:02:55 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
Plus this is a push pull. They asked first who won the debate, Kerry, etc. Then asked, who would you vote for Prez.

Exactly.

15 posted on 10/02/2004 4:02:57 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Looks like dan rather conducted this poll, maybe back in 1972 on his PC.


16 posted on 10/02/2004 4:03:25 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
You go first.

I thought I did.

17 posted on 10/02/2004 4:03:39 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

From Tim Graham at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/graham200410011024.asp

"Shortly before the debate began, Newsweek national editor Jon Meacham suggested on MSNBC that journalists are tired of Bush being in the lead, and so will try to narrow the race. Meacham foresaw "the possibility that President Bush has peaked about a month too early. Because we all need a narrative to change." Chris Matthews asked: "Is that your prediction?" Meacham replied: "I think it's possible that we're gonna be sitting around saying, 'Well you know Kerry really surprised us.' Because in a way the imperative is to change the story." "

Nuff said?


18 posted on 10/02/2004 4:04:23 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Newsweek is not a credible source.
RCP Average 9/22 - 10/2 48.7% 44.3% 2.0% Bush +4.4
Newsweek (1013 RV) 9/30 - 10/2 45% 47% 2% Kerry +2 LA Times (1100 LV) 9/25 - 9/28 51% 45% 2% Bush +6 CNN/USAT/Gallup (758 LV) 9/24 - 9/26 52% 44% 3% Bush +8 IBD/TIPP (649 LV) 9/22 - 9/27 45% 45% 2% TIE ABC News/WP (810 LV) 9/23 - 9/26 51% 45% 1% Bush +6 Pew Research (948 RV) 9/22 - 9/26 48% 40% 2% Bush +8
Rasmussen has Bush ahead by 3.
Electoral College Bush 213...Kerry 169 The Dems more than likely filled the poll. Even AOL polled today and showed Bush the winner...shrug.
19 posted on 10/02/2004 4:04:41 PM PDT by xtinct (I was the kid next door's imaginary friend. Doing my best to piss the liberal heathen off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Folks,

I am a frequent poster and have an ancient sign up date. This is not contrived negativism, and it's not even critical of Bush.

It is not clear that ANY polls target a partisan mix, other than Rasmussen and Zogby. They can't. This partisan mix result could be self identified.

Meaning, they could call at random and simply ask if the person is GOP or Dem. This would then be the result the random calling got. The questions would be "Are you registered? What party are you registered as? Who would you vote for today?"

This would mean the partisan mix is self identified.

Most of the pollsters do not aim at any mix, with the exception of Rasmussen.


20 posted on 10/02/2004 4:05:14 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson