Posted on 09/30/2004 8:53:43 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
Are you kidding me? Check out the tape when the debates ended and Jim Lehrer walks up to Kerry and winks and nod's at him.
What the hell was that all about? I smell a hand off of the questions prior to the debates.
No way Kerry comes off this clean. Not a chance.
but bush is running for president not reagan..and that's the problem.
I saw it--I expected him to mouth "good job" or something like that. I rewatched the beginning of the tape and Lehrer's facial expression to Kerry at the end was unlike anything else throughout the night. He looked like his ship had come in.
Odd, isn't it, that the ONLY issue Kerry has is attacking Bush on Iraq -- and lo and behold, the ONLY questions Lehrer asks during the "Foreign policy" debate are about Iraq.
You can't spell. You have a stupid screen name and you probably went to public school. Go away troll.
Bump to your last post
All the asshole trolls in the house tonight I see.
I was disappointed that Bush didn't talk about how unethical it is to authorize war without authorizing the money to fight the war, especially after that detail-robot talked about how the men weren't equipped. What audacity to bring it up! Furthermore, I STILL haven't got a clue about his plan for peace. Summits? Bush said that they already are having summits. Bring in more NATO nations? They already are--and if any more is done by our NATO "friends", we'll end up footing more of the bill and letting them take the cream of the profits from a rebuilt Iraq. Too bad Bush didn't mention anything about what theives the UN has been.
Because Homeland Security was one of the debate topics.
Perhaps we should all remove our tin-foil hats so that we can focus on what is more important.
Note that my agreement on what I saw was only an obvious "bias" on the part of Lehrer. Nobody really doubts that. However, I seriously doubt that sKerry had the questions in advance, especially on the heels of Rathergate. Let's all get a little more serious.
BTTT
Why do all the moderators have to be partisan Democrats?
[Nuclear sarcasm torpedo ARMED. FIRE!]
I beg to differ, but you must understand the nuance...he's French.
Remember when the EU set a November deadline for Iran to comply on nuclear materials?
What that really means, is that if Bush wins, and Iran doesn't yet have a nuke to drop on the US, then France will hand them one.
John Kerry merely wants to beat the Frenchies to the punch, n'est-ce pas?
Yep. And no Swift Boat questions, no questions about Kerry's votes in the Senate against weapons systems, etc., etc.
Bush came across as a honest straight guy. Kerry acted like a slick lawyer, double talk, johnny cockrin style. I hope the rest of the folks saw what I saw
But weren't you curious what color kerry would be tonight?
LMFAO
Yes, I did see another vanity post, and one I find quite interesting actually! I wasn't forced to click on this post were you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.