Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHat is the timeline for the C-BS memo?
Ignatz

Posted on 09/30/2004 11:49:28 AM PDT by Ignatz

Does anyone have a timeline for the Dan Rather/C-BS memogate affair? A co-worker is arguing that the White House released the memo to C-BS, therefore Dan Rather has NOT lost his credibility.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bias; cbs; memo; memogate; newsmedia; rather
Thanks in advance, Pajamahadeen!
1 posted on 09/30/2004 11:49:30 AM PDT by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

Your coworker is quite confused. CBS gave the documents to the White House, not the other way around.


2 posted on 09/30/2004 11:52:06 AM PDT by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

CBS faxed the documents to the White House, not the other way around.


3 posted on 09/30/2004 11:52:08 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
A co-worker is arguing that the White House released the memo to C-B

The White House released a forged document harshly criticizing Bush? Ask the "co-worker" to repeat that several times. Then laugh and point at him.

4 posted on 09/30/2004 11:52:09 AM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

Your co-worker is wrong.

John Roberts at CBS carried the memos to the White House at 11:00 a.m. the day that they aired them.

That's the first time they had seen them; after the show, the White House gave reporters who asked for them copies.


5 posted on 09/30/2004 11:53:35 AM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

Go to "search" on this site and type in CBS Timeline and I'm sure you'll find one as there were some excellent ones posted here.

Two hours or so BEFORE Rather's show the White House was given the memos. They of course did not comment on them prompting CBS to think that they were legit.

nick


6 posted on 09/30/2004 11:54:45 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

your co-worker is insane. keep your eye on him...


7 posted on 09/30/2004 11:57:45 AM PDT by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

There is a timeline on www.rathergate.com

It's a link to the American Thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3866


8 posted on 09/30/2004 11:57:46 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Go here
There's a timeline graph and more detail here.
9 posted on 09/30/2004 12:01:38 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
A co-worker is arguing that the White House released the memo to C-BS, therefore Dan Rather has NOT lost his credibility.

The White House released the memos (without comment) that CBS gave to them.

10 posted on 09/30/2004 12:03:20 PM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

Old news. We are working on the rumor that Bush will introduce a draft immediately after winning re-election.

If Kerry somehow manages to get elected, against all odds, we may be absolutely CERTAIN that a draft for "national service" will be introduced with the first State of the Union address that a President Kerry may deliver.


11 posted on 09/30/2004 12:03:35 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
,i>Two hours or so BEFORE Rather's show the White House was given the memos. They of course did not comment on them prompting CBS to think that they were legit.

You mean you fault the White House for not jumping the gun, ala SeeBS, and commenting without time to properly vet the copies of the copies of the forged memos? Only an idiot would have issued a conclusive statement under those conditions (or expected someone to issue the statement).

12 posted on 09/30/2004 12:11:16 PM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

13 posted on 09/30/2004 12:31:06 PM PDT by Xphantasos (Ceterum censeo Al-Quaedam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Xphantasos

LOL! But I don't think that CBS was big enough to have been Sauron!


14 posted on 09/30/2004 12:35:12 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

True... they simply represent Sauron's "eye", or his tool...
whatever.


15 posted on 09/30/2004 12:39:19 PM PDT by Xphantasos (Ceterum censeo Al-Quaedam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Xphantasos

I think of them more like the rest of the MSM as the Orks (sp?). :)


16 posted on 09/30/2004 12:54:34 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
ORCS


17 posted on 09/30/2004 1:00:26 PM PDT by Xphantasos (Ceterum censeo Al-Quaedam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Xphantasos

(Doh!)


18 posted on 09/30/2004 1:06:05 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

the way i understand it is cbs news gave the white house a copy a couple hours before the story ran; after the fiasco aired, cbs said the white house didn't say they were fake, which led them to believe they were legit; no word on how the white house should know what personal records from 30 years ago were legit or fake, and the white house did not say the information in the memos was accurate.


19 posted on 09/30/2004 1:13:54 PM PDT by jer2911tx (john kerry doesn't like rice, or as he calls it 'weapons of ass destruction')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trebb

this is cbs spin on it... that since the white house didn't respond they decided to run the piece.


20 posted on 09/30/2004 1:21:35 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson