Skip to comments.
Punk Conservatism
The American Spectator ^
| 9/28/2004
| Andrew Cline
Posted on 09/28/2004 12:17:08 PM PDT by GoldwaterAvenger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Finally, a journalist with the acumen to recognize how very status quo the democratic party and its spent leftist stupideology have become. They may have been able to make a punkrock icon out of perrenial loon Howard Dean, but Kerry/Edwards?! C'mon, these demosaurs are about as hip and rebellious as Lawrence Welk. Look at GWB motoring around his Texas ranch in that old jalopy pickup and then look at John Forbes Kerry sequestered in his mansion in the Hamptons or Fox Chapel and you tell me how is more punk rock!
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Johnny Ramone, who died recently, and one of the founding fathers of punk, was a Republican. He said his favorite president was Reagan.
2
posted on
09/28/2004 12:20:10 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
3
posted on
09/28/2004 12:22:59 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Hell, I was a punk back in 1980, when it meant something.
4
posted on
09/28/2004 12:26:21 PM PDT
by
Physicist
To: GoldwaterAvenger
The Left has rejected God. That fact alone has (perhaps) no relevance to a discussion about punks. However, what the Left has done, is made the Central State into their God. Thsi is true of Socialism as well as Fascism. In a twist on Christian theology, the Left says "Everything has its origin in the State. Everything receives its purpose from the State. Everything is from, and for, the State."
Punks ain't gonna go for that.
5
posted on
09/28/2004 12:27:24 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(I have two words for John Kerry: "YYYEEEEAAARRGGGHHHH!!!!")
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same. That's the left in a nutshell, and it has not changed since I was a student in the '70's. They have always had their 'freakier than thou' attitude and have (in my personal experience with liberals) always been THE MOST bourgeoisie bunch of jerks in the world.
6
posted on
09/28/2004 12:27:36 PM PDT
by
SMARTY
('Stay together, pay the soldiers, forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus, to his sons)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
To: GoldwaterAvenger
I was in a band until a month ago. You have no idea how dangerous the punk rock scene is to kids. They are being brainwashed.
the right promotes individualism
9
posted on
09/28/2004 12:30:56 PM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
The left espouses group identity; the right promotes individualism. This is my own personal understanding of the difference between a lefty and a righty. If you think about it, it pretty much explains everything.
10
posted on
09/28/2004 12:31:14 PM PDT
by
MCH
To: ClearCase_guy
Exactly. This very same case is made eloquently in David Horowitz's "Radical Son"--highly recommended reading. As a former founding member of the New Left, Horowitz draws a valid comparison between socialism and idolatry.
11
posted on
09/28/2004 12:41:25 PM PDT
by
GoldwaterAvenger
(Onward Republitarian soldiers)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
12
posted on
09/28/2004 12:42:53 PM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
(Liberalism IS a mental disease, thanks to Gramsci, Marcuse and others from the Frankfurt School.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Well forgive me if I still don't feel compelled to stop and chat with a "punker" at the store. Creepy looking sons-a-b*tches.
13
posted on
09/28/2004 12:46:06 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's getting hard to see through all of the "white out" on my screen.)
To: freeeee
Well then, perhaps you can explain in what way the ideological right promotes egalitarianism? Obviously in your two-dimensional cartoon world there is no correlation between definitions and concepts.
To: paltz
15
posted on
09/28/2004 12:54:42 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(I LOVE Halliburton, SUVs and Assault Weapons. Any Questions?)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Watch what you say about Lawrence Welk!
;)
To: Jaysun
Well, I'm 55 and never been a "punker", but I have talked to quite a few, just to see what they are all about.
Most of these kids are nice, just looking for attention. Most of them I have found don't have much of a relationship with their families. I think that the Republican Party in many regards is what these punkers are looking for, some kind of foundation and moral structure in their lives.
Their parents usually are Democratic, wealthy and the kids hardly see them. Can't judge a book by it's cover.
To: GoldwaterAvenger
perhaps you can explain in what way the ideological right promotes egalitarianism? As a fan of Goldwater, I'm sure you're aware there are many factions of 'the right'.
The ones who dominate rightwing politics today; the country club Republicans, 'security' moms, the RNC, RINO/CINO's are those to which my comment was directed. There are no shortage of supporters of such on this website.
At nearly every turn, they show a singleminded determination to make the individual more subservient to the state. Whatever claim they had to individuality was lost long ago when the Goldwater/small government faction was driven from the party.
Of course come election time they offer cheap propaganda to the memory challenged and call themselves individualists. They compare themselves to the avowed socialists of the Democratic party to make themselves look good. I think of it akin to a skunk standing next to a roadkill claiming to smell of roses.
18
posted on
09/28/2004 1:02:11 PM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Punk's libertarian, so it's neither liberal or conservative, although there are issues of common interest in both.
So, punk culture is as likely to piss on political correctness and big government as it is on organized religion and military action.
Some punks tend one direction or the other but even the extreme right and left of punkhood are more anarchistic than ideological in the end.
Culturally, I will agree that punks are unlikely to join Kerry for cognac and a pleasant early evening discussion, but if Jenna and Barbara think their folks are unhip squares, life on the ranch ain't going to go over well either.
Punks would prefer to party with Bush circa 1973 or so.
19
posted on
09/28/2004 1:04:11 PM PDT
by
mlwjones
To: not2worry
Can't judge a book by it's cover.
I've never been able to apply that little bit of wisdom. To me, everyone's a cover. Just a bunch of revealing covers. I have different bits of wisdom such as, "Don't trust anyone whose head is too small for their body." It's true.
20
posted on
09/28/2004 1:09:14 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's getting hard to see through all of the "white out" on my screen.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson