Skip to comments.
CLINTONS SHUTTING UP, QUIETLY UNDERMINING KERRY
CHRONWATCH.COM ^
| SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
| CHRIS LONG
Posted on 09/28/2004 11:58:32 AM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: CHARLITE
What an excellent article! Those "Rather-isms" are hilarious, too.
To: CHARLITE
Condi Rice for '08...totally unbeatable, even Hilary wouldn't have a chance.
To: Gucho
63
posted on
09/28/2004 12:58:49 PM PDT
by
maryz
To: YaYa123
"whence he will set about wrecking the military establishment"
64
posted on
09/28/2004 12:59:08 PM PDT
by
Gucho
To: ArmyBratCutie
I don't fear her. I have contempt for her. I can't imagine her ever being able to accomplish any of her 'goals' for the U.S.--her negatives are much too high. And imagine Hillary as Commander-in-Chief. Do you think the services have any respect for this phony?
65
posted on
09/28/2004 12:59:09 PM PDT
by
Calico Cat
(the simplest solution is usually the correct one)
To: ArmyBratCutie
How soon we all forget!
Hitlery was already President FOR 8 LONG YEARS!
66
posted on
09/28/2004 12:59:45 PM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
("If you understood what communism was, you would pray that we would be communist." - Jane Fonda)
To: My2Cents
I've managed factory workers, field service technicians, and a small company I grew enormously. In doing those things you get to understand what motivates the people who can be motivated.
Hillary is easy to motivate. Bill OTOH is a toughnut to crack(no pun intended). He is not motivated by too much other than getting away with something and he really has a strong need to rub elbows with the powerful, but yet does not want to be one of those same people. It's like he wants to be a go-between or consigliere. Bill is one of those employees who wouldn't be happy unless he was padding his expenses by only a little bit, daring you to find it. He would be one of those employees who would decide to attend important meetings based only on who was at the meeting, not it's substance. Bill is not a details person and would leave almost all assignments to subordinates to finish once it was no longer high profile. Bill feels that most his coworkers are borish and tries to sidetrack them to make work more entertaining.
Hillary on the other hand is easy.......All you'd have to do to wind her up and watch her go is to question her every decision. Not that you need to or want to, but without that she'd have no fire in her belly. She's too stupid to figure out how she was being managed. People like that are quite valuable in the workplace. You can get them to the point that they walk thru the door each day ready to rip someone's head off. It's loads of fun.
67
posted on
09/28/2004 1:04:34 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(I survived John Dupont's wrestling camp and all I got was a lousy tee shirt and a prolapse.)
To: Calico Cat; Kerretarded
I cant see it either....but I do fear her...I worry I dont worry enuff....I cant imagine my father would take orders from her, BUT then again, he was a solid military offier.. I wonder about the "honoring the office" not the person with the military...he hated Kerry and Fonda until the day he passed away...
I dont ever even want to see her RUNNING, unless its to jump off the nearest building and splatter below....I truly despise her, bill and chelsea...
68
posted on
09/28/2004 1:04:34 PM PDT
by
ArmyBratCutie
("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
To: My2Cents
And Hillary's rumored *ahem* preferences.
To: ArmyBratCutie
She could be, However, I tend to believe the anti-christ has come already. I believe he is Alah, and we are dealing with his rath right now.
To: blackdog
Interesting distinctions. Your read on people is a good indication why you have successfully built a business, and I have not.
But I wonder what role both Bill's and Hillary's apparent tendency to surround themselves with people who are essentially "Yes Persons," and who are clearly dumber than they are (in order to appear to be the smartest person in the room).
71
posted on
09/28/2004 1:11:16 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
To: television is just wrong
you might be right....didnt Nostradamus (sp?) predict that the antichrist would come from the land of Alah??
72
posted on
09/28/2004 1:11:32 PM PDT
by
ArmyBratCutie
("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
To: CHARLITE
73
posted on
09/28/2004 1:16:35 PM PDT
by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: ArmyBratCutie
Yes, I'm sure of it. This prophet, came, left, and we are left to deal with what he created.
To: My2Cents
The Clintons only surrounded themselves with people who had a signifigant weakness or charicter flaws. That was no mistake or faux paux. An employee with an abusive spouse, an alchoholic partner, drug habits, emotional problems, IRS troubles, or any other thing they are not proud of are a good mark to tap as an employee who will blindly go forth at all personal cost to them if you take them into your confidence(or really just make them think you have). It's really annoying from a maintenence perspective, but it pays off big when you want cover. The Clintons were masters at this. FBI hiring rules for Whitehouse staff typically weed those types out, but if you remember, the Clintons won that battle with the FBI and Secret Service. That was part of the Aldrich fallout.
Unless you are God, part of being human is being manipulated or manipulating someone else. It's the pecking order thing in our species of higher intellect.
75
posted on
09/28/2004 1:25:37 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(I survived John Dupont's wrestling camp and all I got was a lousy tee shirt and a prolapse.)
To: ArmyBratCutie
didnt Nostradamus (sp?) predict that the antichrist would come from the land of Alah??I remember an article in Life magazine in the late '50s or early '60s stating that someone was born recently, in the Middle East, who would change the world. I don't remember if it was for the better or worse. This came to mind again when I first learned of Osama's existence.
76
posted on
09/28/2004 1:28:24 PM PDT
by
nycgal
To: chris1
good point, HRC will be welcomed with the red carpet, and the (drunken) Kennedy wing of the party, with Teddy pointing to 75+ years, will be no more, the final stake to the Kennedy dynasty (LOL) will be delivered with the compliments of HRC.
The Democratic Party will be Bill and Hillary's for the taking, there will be nobody that even comes close to their power.
77
posted on
09/28/2004 1:29:09 PM PDT
by
wrathof59
(semper ubi sub ubi)
To: CHARLITE
78
posted on
09/28/2004 1:31:05 PM PDT
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Dan Rather plans to spend the winter in Valley Forgery.-hflynn)
To: nycgal
Nostradamus was in a constant drug induced state from all the fungus growing in the european grain stocks at the time. It's why the time period was filled with such creativity and paranoia. One long bad acid trip with each meal. The peasants who were more connected to constant gathering for sustinance were less afflicted and even to the extent they were, they could not read or write to communicate any of it. The royalty and educated were absolutely insane and made policy, war, art, and texts based on their altered state.
Ignore Nostradamus, for without Orson Wells and Al Stewart, we'd have ignored him. I too was convinced in 1978 that the world was ending before next weekend. It helped with the chicks too.
79
posted on
09/28/2004 1:38:22 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(I survived John Dupont's wrestling camp and all I got was a lousy tee shirt and a prolapse.)
To: CHARLITE
Absolutely right, and the Clintonistas will leave nothing to chance. I would be willing to bet that even now they are briefing Kerry for the debates and recommending debating strategies that will guarantee a poor performance on his part.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson