Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Militarizing Border Won't Stop Illegal Deluge
Newsmax.com ^ | Monday, Sept. 27, 2004 11:07 p.m. EDT

Posted on 09/27/2004 11:40:43 PM PDT by Robert Lomax

The U.S. has no plans to deploy troops along the Mexican border to stanch the deluge of illegal aliens currently pouring into the country at the rate of 3 million per year, President Bush said in an interview broadcast on Monday.

"As the governor of Texas, I was very aware of this issue," Bush told Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly.

Story Continues Below

"There is a long border, that makes it hard to control. We have beefed up places along the border to try to stop" the flow, he said. When told that his policy didn't seem to be working, Bush insisted, "It’s working a little better.

"They're doing a pretty good job down in Arizona, which is the main border crossing. ... I think there's a thousand more border patrol agents along the border. We’re modernizing border techniques, we’re using better surveillance methods to stop this crossing at the border."

The president contended, however, that illegal immigration was driven primarily by the economic realities of the region.

"If you can make 50 cents in the interior of Mexico and five bucks in the interior of the United States, you're coming for the five bucks," he explained.

"I happen to believe the best way to enhance the border is to have temporary-worker cards available for people," he said. "I think the long-term solution for this issue on our border is for Mexico to grow a middle class. That's why I believe in NAFTA."

When warned that "a lot of people are not going to like that answer," Bush told O'Reilly, "Well it’s a, a truthful answer."


TOPICS: Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; bush; bushamnesty; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; immigration; issues; spottheretread; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 961-962 next last
To: Jim Robinson

I'm very much against militarizing the border in urban areas and areas that are fairly populated --- and that goes for my own land --- really I don't want the army traipsing across my land (or anyone) looking for illegals. But out in the vast open areas where the drug cartels and violent criminals are coming over I could see the military patrolling. The more harmless types aren't too likely to take those more dangerous routes anyhow --- it's easy enough to get over close to town. There are some though who have good reason to avoid detection that use those very remote routes.


641 posted on 09/28/2004 6:19:20 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

"Sincerely". LOL


642 posted on 09/28/2004 6:19:44 PM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: FITZ

Militarization will mean numerous Mexican kills and casualties. A whole lot of people will care.


643 posted on 09/28/2004 6:20:10 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker
"Sincerely". LOL

I know, it's hard to be sincere, when you’re speaking to idiots; but I try.

644 posted on 09/28/2004 6:21:57 PM PDT by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: FITZ

Yes, I understand all that, but I do not agree with the idea of using a federal ID card that must be presented for any of us to get work. Nor using the SS number (a system that should be scrapped). This type of system violates our (all of us, it would not just apply to illegals) rights to privacy and security of personal information and every employer's rights as well.


645 posted on 09/28/2004 6:22:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII; JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; ...
Why the migrants keep pourint in - ping.

__________________

President George Bush:

"If you can make 50 cents in the interior of Mexico and five bucks in the interior of the United States, you're coming for the five bucks," he explained."


646 posted on 09/28/2004 6:23:38 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Just 36 more days until November 2nd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector

Why would you put "Marine" in your moniker, showcase it in your profile, but delete your greatest honor?

You not only were an Embassy Guard, if I recall, but you TAUGHT Marines how to be Marines.

Now it's just infantry.


647 posted on 09/28/2004 6:24:21 PM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
I can see abolishing the minimum wage after all kinds of welfare programs are abolished. As it is --- many people can afford to accept minimum wage and below because they will get $400 to $700 in housing subsidies, free health care, food stamps, WIC, and a whole lot more.

There seems to be two ways that wages go up --- labor shortages where business competes for labor --- begins offering higher wages, benefits such as health insurance, etc --- or unions and violence and socialism and government involvement.

648 posted on 09/28/2004 6:25:11 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
By the way, I'm from a family of 9 children.

My Mother was from a family of 11, Mr. Robinson. Her Mother immigrated LEGALLY from Hungary, then married an American. They raised their 11 children without government assistance, probably the same way your parents did. It is not up to American citizens/taxpayers to pay the bills for the millions of illegal aliens who sneak across our borders.

They're here illegally, they're sucking up all our resources, our social services, our schools, our hospitals, and they're taking our jobs. We're forced to pay for all of it. Our government is allowing this to happen. This is not a racial thing, it's an economic thing. You can't be surprised that people are angry.

649 posted on 09/28/2004 6:26:14 PM PDT by janetgreen (CALIFORNIA/MEXIFORNIA - ILLEGAL ALIEN PARADISE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
The opposite would be Mexican soldiers shooting down americans making a break for mexico. :-)

People would be shocked to know the border is already very militarized on the Mexican side --- their army is there --- crawling all over the border. There isn't an illegal who won't tell you that --- many aren't sure what they're doing --- but they will stop people --- sometimes they're looking for Central Americans but they apparently are looking for drugs --- not necessarily to stop the flow of drugs into the USA but to protect one cartel from competitors.

650 posted on 09/28/2004 6:27:55 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

"I ask not for perfection; only adherence to the Constitution. For that, Bush is NOT the man... neither is Kerry, but W's the topic here."

When faced with a choice between the lesser of two evils, the answer is obvious. And the only alternatives are Bush and Kerry. At least with Bush e can hope to gain some leverage and some chance of Constitutional Federal Judges.


651 posted on 09/28/2004 6:30:36 PM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
"If you can make 50 cents in the interior of Mexico and five bucks in the interior of the United States, you're coming for the five bucks," he explained."

And it's one two three what are our borders for, don't ask me I don't give damn, best learn to speak Mexican...... Country Joe and the Fish Tacos.

Or is it the new political rally chant?

652 posted on 09/28/2004 6:30:44 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: FITZ

I did know that Mexico polices its southern border very well, you are right.

In any event, we will just have to agree to disagree. I don't think americans (right now) will go for that.


653 posted on 09/28/2004 6:30:49 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
Militarization will mean numerous Mexican kills and casualties. A whole lot of people will care.

The military could also find many who are abandoned by their smugglers before they actually die --- there are a lot of deaths of Mexicans --- and really not very many people seem to care. Obviously the Mexican government doesn't care --- it does nothing to make their lives worthwhile back home --- it just has it's eyes on what money they could send back if they make it over here. We had a number of deaths in this area this summer and recently --- pregnant women, 16 year old kids --- heat related or drownings in the river and canals and no one talks about it or seems bothered by it. It's kind of like traffic accident deaths --- they make the front or second page and people read about it but don't lose sleep over it.

654 posted on 09/28/2004 6:32:58 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

That's what I've been trying to say. It's an economic problem and (short of war with Mexico) the long term solution will be an economic solution.


655 posted on 09/28/2004 6:34:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: FITZ

Someone who gets it BTTT


656 posted on 09/28/2004 6:34:47 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
When faced with a choice between the lesser of two evils, the answer is obvious. And the only alternatives are Bush and Kerry. At least with Bush e can hope to gain some leverage and some chance of Constitutional Federal Judges.

Smart smart smart smart. Let's beat each other up November 4 and forward.

657 posted on 09/28/2004 6:35:06 PM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Mexico is policing it's northern border very well also --- I'm not sure every reason their army is there --- but it's all over the place out there. They will interrogate people they find out there and check their papers and if they're Guatemalans they arrest them --- which is why so many Guatemalans stop in Chiapas to buy fake Mexican birth certificates before they make the trip up --- but they forget to get the IFE card which is kind of important.


658 posted on 09/28/2004 6:36:04 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Trinity_Tx
#486: "It would abolish income taxes & SS deductions for a 20% [or more] federal sales tax on EVERY new product or service, even food/clothes/etc. Illegals would have to pay the tax, but they would not be reimbursed, as would citizens.

In effect an illegals cost of living would go up by whatever the individual tax rebate would be set at. For illegals with families, it would probably price them out of our labor market."

I like it. Best answer to the economic problem so far, IMHO.
Though I'd still be looking for a way for the gov't to do it's job protecting our borders from our enemies...

Without millions of Mexicans pouring over the borders, maybe our Border Patrol could concentrate a bit more on keeping out the bad guys?

659 posted on 09/28/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Depends on whether or not the law is constitutional.

I believe that using military force against those who are invading to our homeland is constitutional. I'll admit that I i'm not positive about this, but I sure hope it is constitutional.

660 posted on 09/28/2004 6:41:01 PM PDT by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 961-962 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson