Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the President Lie About Iraq?
www.gopusa.com ^ | 9-27-04 | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 09/27/2004 8:27:48 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle

Did the President Lie About Iraq?

In every political campaign, there is an issue which rises to the surface and dominates the debate...

(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: debate; election; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: Darksheare
YEs, and about the WMD he was not lying for once.
The Elder Bush knew there were WMD's.
Have you forgotten the 155mm binary chemical artillery shell rigged as an IED in Iraq?


And that's really the point. Of COURSE there were (and probably still are) WMDs in Iraq. This article just illustrates that, in order to believe it a lie, you have to cross party lines to do so.
41 posted on 09/27/2004 8:49:33 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

I mean "the question about whether Clinton lied ABOUT IRAQ definitely doesn't dominate this campaign or any other."

Yikes!


42 posted on 09/27/2004 8:49:33 AM PDT by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

The article is titled, "Did The President Lie About Iraq?". Unless there was a change overnight, the president is still President Bush. My original post stands, PRESIDENT BUSH DOES NOT LIE. Seems like the fools are the ones who titled the article wrong.


43 posted on 09/27/2004 8:51:11 AM PDT by Texagirl4W (Heroes are people who do what needs to be done when it has to be done, regardless of the consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Good article. It really shows the hypocracy of the left. welcome to FR, and ignore the folks that were to lazy read it but quick to criticize. A personal attack is a sorry excuse for a rebuttal especially when those doing the rebutting are unaware of the argument.
44 posted on 09/27/2004 8:52:37 AM PDT by Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok (I'm mad as Zell and I'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis
sorry...friendly fire injury. I was frothing a little bit at all the knee-jerk postings ripping this guy, and got a little carried away myself when composing the "To:" list.

I promise, it'll never happen again (on this thread)...
45 posted on 09/27/2004 8:53:49 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Why is it that every time I see a Republican talking-head on TV getting beat up with 'Bush Lied', they never say that well then, Clinton Lied! AlGore Lied! Teddy Lied, Little Kennedy Lied! ...and on and on. but you never see this? Why?


46 posted on 09/27/2004 8:55:32 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Many of the posts here show how people don't look at the facts and the details, which the Dems count on: They thrive on shallow thought.

We can't be victims of it ourselves.




47 posted on 09/27/2004 8:56:03 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (it means many things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

Did you read the article?


48 posted on 09/27/2004 8:56:15 AM PDT by tiki (Win one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
If you don't need to read the article,

I don't need to read it because I already read it yesterday.

then what are you doing here on FR?

Comedy relief. But, since that didn't work, I guess pointing out the "Search" function will have to suffice for now.

49 posted on 09/27/2004 9:00:19 AM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
And the Poles found 12 more chemical shells, and Marines purifying river water during the invasion found high concentrations of cw precursors in the water, and the former second in command at Centcom says that Centcom received both humint and sigint just prior to the invasion that Saddam was moving most of his WMD's to Syria (some of which were probably used in the foiled Zarqaui plot against Amman), and after the invasion the Kuwaitis captured smugglers who were attempting to remove from Iraq empty chemical warheads, and an Iraqi nuclear scientist buried in his backyard a centrifuge capable of enriching uranium, and David Kay testified before Congress that it is his belief that we will ultimately determine that Saddam was much more dangerous than we believed him to be at the time of the invasion, and Bill Clinton bombed the Sudan because he and Richard Clarke believed that Saddam was assisting Al Qaeda to manufacture chemical weapons there.

But just keep repeating to yourself: "Dan Rather told me that Saddam had no WMD's or WMD programs, so that must be true."

50 posted on 09/27/2004 9:00:33 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texagirl4W

Please read the article, okay?

It will give you valuable ammunition every time some lib says, "Bush Lied."


51 posted on 09/27/2004 9:01:10 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (it means many things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Did you read my previous posts on this thread where I admitted my mistake?


52 posted on 09/27/2004 9:01:27 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texagirl4W
Seems like the fools are the ones who titled the article wrong.

The article was titled by the folks on gopusa.com. Your beef is with them.

But even so, if you're baited so easily, I'd watch out for other hooks....
53 posted on 09/27/2004 9:02:14 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tiki

See posts numbers 20 and 26.


54 posted on 09/27/2004 9:02:50 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: michigander

Hmmm...just got it in my GOPUSA email less than an hour ago.

Well, it seems to be worth a re-post, cuz lots of folks seem to be reacting to it.



55 posted on 09/27/2004 9:06:43 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (it means many things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
No he didn't LIE!!

In order for him to have lied HE would HAVE to KNOW there were NO WMD in IRAQ. That means he would have been the ONLY person on the face of the earth with that information. The people who accuse him of lying are perposterous and of course, Democrats!!

56 posted on 09/27/2004 9:06:48 AM PDT by PISANO (NEVER FORGET 911 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: p. henry

33 (I think) mustard shells were found.
The press immediately screamed that they were 'old' and hence 'not WMD'..

Gotta love it when they move the goal posts, right?


57 posted on 09/27/2004 9:08:15 AM PDT by Darksheare (Liberalism is political domestic abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

Reading, what's this, huu?


58 posted on 09/27/2004 9:08:20 AM PDT by BigDoom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

the article is talking about Clinton not Bush


59 posted on 09/27/2004 9:08:43 AM PDT by Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok (I'm mad as Zell and I'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

PLEASE!! READ the ENTIRE article before comment:) The writer is from the GOP...and is a very clever fellow. Glad he's on our side.


60 posted on 09/27/2004 9:09:55 AM PDT by SE Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson