Did the President Lie About Iraq?

www.gopusa.com ^ | 9-27-04 | Bobby Eberle

[rightinthemiddle]

Did the President Lie About Iraq?

In every political campaign, there is an issue which rises to the surface and dominates the debate...

[beezdotcom]

YEs, and about the WMD he was not lying for once.
The Elder Bush knew there were WMD's.
Have you forgotten the 155mm binary chemical artillery shell rigged as an IED in Iraq?

And that's really the point. Of COURSE there were (and probably still are) WMDs in Iraq. This article just illustrates that, in order to believe it a lie, you have to cross party lines to do so.

[Fatalis]

I mean "the question about whether Clinton lied ABOUT IRAQ definitely doesn't dominate this campaign or any other."

Yikes!

[Texagirl4W]

The article is titled, "Did The President Lie About Iraq?". Unless there was a change overnight, the president is still President Bush. My original post stands, PRESIDENT BUSH DOES NOT LIE. Seems like the fools are the ones who titled the article wrong.

[Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok]

Good article. It really shows the hypocracy of the left. welcome to FR, and ignore the folks that were to lazy read it but quick to criticize. A personal attack is a sorry excuse for a rebuttal especially when those doing the rebutting are unaware of the argument.

[beezdotcom]

sorry...friendly fire injury. I was frothing a little bit at all the knee-jerk postings ripping this guy, and got a little carried away myself when composing the "To:" list.

I promise, it'll never happen again (on this thread)...

[TexasCajun]

Why is it that every time I see a Republican talking-head on TV getting beat up with 'Bush Lied', they never say that well then, Clinton Lied! AlGore Lied! Teddy Lied, Little Kennedy Lied! ...and on and on. but you never see this? Why?

[rightinthemiddle]

Many of the posts here show how people don't look at the facts and the details, which the Dems count on: They thrive on shallow thought.

We can't be victims of it ourselves.

[tiki]

Did you read the article?

[michigander]

If you don't need to read the article,

I don't need to read it because I already read it yesterday.

then what are you doing here on FR?

Comedy relief. But, since that didn't work, I guess pointing out the "Search" function will have to suffice for now.

[p. henry]

And the Poles found 12 more chemical shells, and Marines purifying river water during the invasion found high concentrations of cw precursors in the water, and the former second in command at Centcom says that Centcom received both humint and sigint just prior to the invasion that Saddam was moving most of his WMD's to Syria (some of which were probably used in the foiled Zarqaui plot against Amman), and after the invasion the Kuwaitis captured smugglers who were attempting to remove from Iraq empty chemical warheads, and an Iraqi nuclear scientist buried in his backyard a centrifuge capable of enriching uranium, and David Kay testified before Congress that it is his belief that we will ultimately determine that Saddam was much more dangerous than we believed him to be at the time of the invasion, and Bill Clinton bombed the Sudan because he and Richard Clarke believed that Saddam was assisting Al Qaeda to manufacture chemical weapons there.

But just keep repeating to yourself: "Dan Rather told me that Saddam had no WMD's or WMD programs, so that must be true."

[rightinthemiddle]

Please read the article, okay?

It will give you valuable ammunition every time some lib says, "Bush Lied."

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Did you read my previous posts on this thread where I admitted my mistake?

[beezdotcom]

Seems like the fools are the ones who titled the article wrong.

The article was titled by the folks on gopusa.com. Your beef is with them.

But even so, if you're baited so easily, I'd watch out for other hooks....

[AxelPaulsenJr]

See posts numbers 20 and 26.

[rightinthemiddle]

Hmmm...just got it in my GOPUSA email less than an hour ago.

Well, it seems to be worth a re-post, cuz lots of folks seem to be reacting to it.

[PISANO]

No he didn't LIE!!

In order for him to have lied HE would HAVE to KNOW there were NO WMD in IRAQ. That means he would have been the ONLY person on the face of the earth with that information. The people who accuse him of lying are perposterous and of course, Democrats!!

[Darksheare]

33 (I think) mustard shells were found.
The press immediately screamed that they were 'old' and hence 'not WMD'..

Gotta love it when they move the goal posts, right?

[BigDoom]

Reading, what's this, huu?

[Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok]

the article is talking about Clinton not Bush

[SE Mom]

PLEASE!! READ the ENTIRE article before comment:) The writer is from the GOP...and is a very clever fellow. Glad he's on our side.