Posted on 09/27/2004 8:27:48 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle
Did the President Lie About Iraq?
In every political campaign, there is an issue which rises to the surface and dominates the debate...
(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...
Yeah....it was a trick piece..to change the title .....would tip of the DemocRATs....seriously...has anyone sent this article to Dan Rather, so he can quote the President. bwaaaaaaaaaaahahhaaaaa
Be Ever Vigilant!
I get it, I am supposed to read 90 posts befoe I comment on something stupid you said?
Get a grip, I was going to apologize to you before you said something even stupider by attacking me.
You should have waited and you would have gotten the apology.
But you deserved the "stupid" moniker for what you said.
You apparently had time to read that long article. So why did you not have time to read down, not all 90 comments, but to comment number 20, where I made my first of two apologies.?
Get a grip, I was going to apologize to you before you said something even stupider by attacking me.
You know, somehow I don't believe you.
You should have waited and you would have gotten the apology.
When did you plan to make this apology?
But you deserved the "stupid" moniker for what you said.
LOL, perhaps so. And if you had bothered to read on down in the comments you would have seen, that at comment number 20 I made my first apology.
you're only looking worse here...
No at all, not at all.
Then you better count the number of comments posted that make notice of your lack of reading comprehension that you so aptly displayed in post #5
like post 15
like post 25
like post 48
like post 73, who looks like he read it as badly as you...
then mine....
Yours and the other posts that came after my post number 20, show the lack of reading comprehension.
Can the admin moderator stop this man before I post again please??
I would say that it is just as logical to assume that that poster was merely bumping the thread back to the top, not agreeing with my original mistake.
When you start losing an argument, is this your tack, to bail out. To pull a hanoi john and ask the President to stop those nasty attacks against you?
Can't we all just get along? (I was Rodney King in a previous life.)
LOL, I'm sure we can.
That all depends on whether this person keeps acting up or not.
He posted a statement based on his quick reading, which made him look bad, and he keeps flaming me because I didn't choose to read 20 more posts to see if he caught on.
The problem isn't mine, he didn't flame anyone else that pointed out his mistake that I saw, so, it aint me that has the problem.
Also, if you check the records, I privately e-mailed you admins to yank his initial comment, and in my explanation, I said it was to save his honor by removing the statement he made by accident, and you moderators can verify that by going back and reading what I sent you.
So you see, I tried to save his honor, and he started a flame war, and rather than keep having to put up with his personal insults, I contacted you twice to fix it.
Bump.
The Spanish did when the socialists came to power.
Bump.
Well in the first place I politely accepted the mods wishes that we get along. However, your comments just now require that I say the following, after which Mods, you will hear no more from me on this subject.
Acting up, by merely replying to your posts made to me? Sir, your debating skills are abysmal. You don't mind commenting that I should read before I post. But when you're caught posting before you read, you got insulted and post a personal attack to me.
He posted a statement based on his quick reading, which made him look bad, and he keeps flaming me because I didn't choose to read 20 more posts to see if he caught on.
Flaming you? No way and the mods know that is not the case. You are the one who has kept this silly debate alive. And even now you can't be accurate, it was only 15 more posts down where my first of two APOLOGIES for my mistake was posted.
The problem isn't mine, he didn't flame anyone else that pointed out his mistake that I saw, so, it aint me that has the problem.
No one was flamed sir.
Also, if you check the records, I privately e-mailed you admins to yank his initial comment, and in my explanation, I said it was to save his honor by removing the statement he made by accident, and you moderators can verify that by going back and reading what I sent you.
My honor was intact, no thanks to you, by the FIRST of TWO apologies that I made regarding my initial error. See posts numbers 20 and 26.
So you see, I tried to save his honor, and he started a flame war, and rather than keep having to put up with his personal insults, I contacted you twice to fix it.
Personal insults? Apparently you consider being caught in an error, insulting. At any rate I will apologize to you for any perceived personal insults.
Sir, you obviously have some serious personal issues that you need to address, and I will leave you to tend to those matters.
Note to moderator: This will be my last post to this gentleman. As Bill O'Reilly likes to say, "I will give him the last word".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.