Did the President Lie About Iraq?

www.gopusa.com ^ | 9-27-04 | Bobby Eberle

[rightinthemiddle]

Did the President Lie About Iraq?

In every political campaign, there is an issue which rises to the surface and dominates the debate...

[freestyle]

Honestly, I think the article was titled perfectly.

I think it was written for Clinton loving liberals to read. I can see them seething with hatred while reading this article for the "lying" Bush.

As they read quote after quote from "the president," they hate him more and more...

...then, when they read the last line of the article, they are forced to confront their own blatant hypocrisy.

[RaceBannon]

Hey, I am not the idiot who made the stupid statement in the first place, so, why don't you just relax and realize people dont read 75 posts before commenting on a stupid statement?

[jonno]

Not to nitpick - but didn't the Italians bug out?
(or am I thinking of somebody else...)

Regards,

[rightinthemiddle]

I just sent this to a liberal friend of mine...I'm afraid it won't have any impact on him, cuz he hates Bush SO much. But it could have an impact on the "undecideds" who have listened to all this stuff from the DNC, McAwful and Skerry.

[AmericanMade1776]

Better Yet send it to Dan Rather, and see if he can muddle the news up one more time. Rather is always good for a laugh.

[beezdotcom]

That is what I thought, the title of the article should of been.... DID FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON LIE ABUOT IRAQ?

I'm eagerly awaiting a copy of your email to gopusa.com where you admonish them about the title of their article (which was referenced by this thread)...

[AxelPaulsenJr]

No, it obviously didn't take 75 posts for you to show what an idiot you are.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Actually it was after 90 posts that you made your ill informed comment.

[AmericanMade1776]

I'm eagerly awaiting a copy of your email to gopusa.com where you admonish them about the title of their article (which was referenced by this thread)... Pardon? Moi, Admonish gop.usa? Me, a Registered Republican, who donates to the republican party, admonish GOP.USA....ohhhhhhhhhhhhh i get it, you are using sarcasm? right?

[Flightdeck]

"Have you forgotten the 155mm binary chemical artillery shell rigged as an IED in Iraq?"

Or the 35 other chemical warheads found so far and counting.

[SmellsLikeOwen]

You need to read the "entire" article..... 80)

Cheers!

[Darksheare]

What has me somewhat spooked/miffed is that the IED Sarin shell had no markings that indicated it was a chemical shell.
Meaning that the chemical shell was sitting in an ammo dump unmarked hidden among the normal HE shells.
And the press buried the story.

They whine that none were found, and forget that there are hundreds of ammo depots throughout Iraq, many of them 55 acres or more in size.
That's alot of ammo to sort through.
So finding the mustard gas shells was a minor miracle.
And the press said, "oh, those are OLD shells."
They forgot that Blix et al couldn't even find those and stated there were none..

[Columbine]

Of course it's a great article. Thanks for posting it.

It's just too bad that so many people jump to conclusions instead of reading.

This is great ammunition to use against liberals but the folks with the knee jerk reactions won't ever know that.

[JrAsparagus]

That's a great list. I have wanted it for a while to combat the dims talking points. I knew a number from memory, but in print is always better. I will distribute today. Thanks.

[SmellsLikeOwen]

No it shouldn't have been!! That's what makes this article so great!
There is this thing in the world, and one day you may run into it, just be careful that it doesn't reach up and bite you on the butt! It's called sarcasm, walk cautiously, and keep an ever watchful eye.....

Cheers!

[JrAsparagus]

Great post, I loved the ending. I will admit, I did not read the article at first. I wanted to read the thread to get a feel whether it would be worth my time and it most certainly was. Thanks!

[rightinthemiddle]

It's starting to work...love it when a plan comes to...gether.

[SmellsLikeOwen]

I can't believe so many people are just reading the headline, or skimming the first paragraph?? Do we need to take a group lesson on just who the GOP is, and who's side their on? LOL Please tell me you people normally read an entire article, good or bad, please say you do? How do you expect to know what's going on? Even if the article was against Bush, how do you expect to stay informed? Winning also requires knowing your enemy! And this is definitely a case of that! READ it NOW PISANO!! It's important INFO!!! ROTF!!!

Cheers!

[RebelDS]

The title is correct. As if I made the statement "the president was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald", I would be making a correct statement. The title is a past tense statement and is not specific to which president. It is that way intentionally to mislead you into thinking it's about Bush and then gets you at the end. The point of it is to have those DU's agreeing with the writer that "the president" lied and then catch them at the end when they realize he was talking about Clinton all along.

[rightinthemiddle]

The light shines on some faster than others...

The Dims count on the masses to be ill-informed and easily influenced. The media are their agents.

Are we the Masses?