Skip to comments.
Did the President Lie About Iraq?
www.gopusa.com ^
| 9-27-04
| Bobby Eberle
Posted on 09/27/2004 8:27:48 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle
Did the President Lie About Iraq?
In every political campaign, there is an issue which rises to the surface and dominates the debate...
(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: debate; election; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
To: AxelPaulsenJr
Honestly, I think the article was titled perfectly.
I think it was written for Clinton loving liberals to read. I can see them seething with hatred while reading this article for the "lying" Bush.
As they read quote after quote from "the president," they hate him more and more...
...then, when they read the last line of the article, they are forced to confront their own blatant hypocrisy.
To: AxelPaulsenJr
Hey, I am not the idiot who made the stupid statement in the first place, so, why don't you just relax and realize people dont read 75 posts before commenting on a stupid statement?
102
posted on
09/27/2004 11:18:20 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(KERRY FLED . . . WHILE GOOD MEN BLED!!)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Not to nitpick - but didn't the Italians bug out?
(or am I thinking of somebody else...)
Regards,
103
posted on
09/27/2004 11:19:27 AM PDT
by
jonno
(We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
To: freestyle
I just sent this to a liberal friend of mine...I'm afraid it won't have any impact on him, cuz he hates Bush SO much. But it could have an impact on the "undecideds" who have listened to all this stuff from the DNC, McAwful and Skerry.
To: bad company
Better Yet send it to Dan Rather, and see if he can muddle the news up one more time. Rather is always good for a laugh.
105
posted on
09/27/2004 11:20:32 AM PDT
by
AmericanMade1776
((John Kerry is now in full retreat))
To: AmericanMade1776
That is what I thought, the title of the article should of been.... DID FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON LIE ABUOT IRAQ?
I'm eagerly awaiting a copy of your email to gopusa.com where you admonish them about the title of their article (which was referenced by this thread)...
106
posted on
09/27/2004 11:26:35 AM PDT
by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: RaceBannon
No, it obviously didn't take 75 posts for you to show what an idiot you are.
107
posted on
09/27/2004 11:27:17 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
To: RaceBannon
Actually it was after 90 posts that you made your ill informed comment.
108
posted on
09/27/2004 11:28:19 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
To: beezdotcom
I'm eagerly awaiting a copy of your email to gopusa.com where you admonish them about the title of their article (which was referenced by this thread)... Pardon? Moi, Admonish gop.usa? Me, a Registered Republican, who donates to the republican party, admonish GOP.USA....ohhhhhhhhhhhhh i get it, you are using sarcasm? right?
109
posted on
09/27/2004 11:32:42 AM PDT
by
AmericanMade1776
((John Kerry is now in full retreat))
To: Darksheare
"Have you forgotten the 155mm binary chemical artillery shell rigged as an IED in Iraq?"
Or the 35 other chemical warheads found so far and counting.
110
posted on
09/27/2004 11:35:33 AM PDT
by
Flightdeck
(Gravity and EM are the same thing. I said it here first.)
To: Reactionary
You need to read the "entire" article..... 80)
Cheers!
To: Flightdeck
What has me somewhat spooked/miffed is that the IED Sarin shell had no markings that indicated it was a chemical shell.
Meaning that the chemical shell was sitting in an ammo dump unmarked hidden among the normal HE shells.
And the press buried the story.
They whine that none were found, and forget that there are hundreds of ammo depots throughout Iraq, many of them 55 acres or more in size.
That's alot of ammo to sort through.
So finding the mustard gas shells was a minor miracle.
And the press said, "oh, those are OLD shells."
They forgot that Blix et al couldn't even find those and stated there were none..
112
posted on
09/27/2004 11:44:13 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Liberalism is political domestic abuse.)
To: rightinthemiddle
Of course it's a great article. Thanks for posting it.
It's just too bad that so many people jump to conclusions instead of reading.
This is great ammunition to use against liberals but the folks with the knee jerk reactions won't ever know that.
113
posted on
09/27/2004 11:45:26 AM PDT
by
Columbine
(Bush '04 - Owens '08)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
That's a great list. I have wanted it for a while to combat the dims talking points. I knew a number from memory, but in print is always better. I will distribute today. Thanks.
To: AmericanMade1776
No it shouldn't have been!! That's what makes this article so great!
There is this thing in the world, and one day you may run into it, just be careful that it doesn't reach up and bite you on the butt! It's called sarcasm, walk cautiously, and keep an ever watchful eye.....
Cheers!
To: beezdotcom
Great post, I loved the ending. I will admit, I did not read the article at first. I wanted to read the thread to get a feel whether it would be worth my time and it most certainly was. Thanks!
To: JrAsparagus
It's starting to work...love it when a plan comes to...gether.
To: PISANO
I can't believe so many people are just reading the headline, or skimming the first paragraph?? Do we need to take a group lesson on just who the GOP is, and who's side their on? LOL Please tell me you people normally read an entire article, good or bad, please say you do? How do you expect to know what's going on? Even if the article was against Bush, how do you expect to stay informed? Winning also requires knowing your enemy! And this is definitely a case of that! READ it NOW PISANO!! It's important INFO!!! ROTF!!!
Cheers!
To: AmericanMade1776
The title is correct. As if I made the statement "the president was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald", I would be making a correct statement. The title is a past tense statement and is not specific to which president. It is that way intentionally to mislead you into thinking it's about Bush and then gets you at the end. The point of it is to have those DU's agreeing with the writer that "the president" lied and then catch them at the end when they realize he was talking about Clinton all along.
119
posted on
09/27/2004 12:10:12 PM PDT
by
RebelDS
To: SmellsLikeOwen
The light shines on some faster than others...
The Dims count on the masses to be ill-informed and easily influenced. The media are their agents.
Are we the Masses?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson