Posted on 09/22/2004 12:40:08 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
We made the disapproving call on this on FR some time ago.
A feeling of vindication mixed with some sadness is a relief.
On Aug. 18, Hudson quit his post as an adviser to the Republican National Committee on Catholic issues. "While I have no intention of being dissuaded by personal attacks, I will not allow low-brow tactics to distract from the critically important issues in this election," he wrote on the website of National Review.
Now that the NCR has done it's job, everyone can go back to supporting abortion.
Sounds like the sack was necessary. Too bad. Prayers for Deal and his family.
>>>Now that the NCR has done it's job, everyone can go back to supporting abortion.
NCR is pretty pathetic, as you note, but I really can't see this guy hanging around at this point. Especially true if the offenses are continuing, as alleged (without support) in the article. At that point he really has to go. We don't need "leadership" like that.
patent
We already have certain Bishops---
Basic rule of thumb : sexual immoral misconduct disqualifies
you from leadership of Catholic institutions and organizations.
I can't recall the name of his EWTN series. Wonder if he will be continuing at EWTN. I don't regularly watch his programs but enjoyed the interviews with the Sister from Nashville.
You called it!
The article says that the board determined that the magazine cannot survive with Hudson at the helm. The question now is whether it can survive without Hudson at the helm. We can all hope that the magazine will meet the fate that it deserves.
It's worth clicking on the link, BTW, since there are several interesting tidbits about the circumstances and the names of the people who turned on Hudson, including Michael Novak. I wonder if the man who wrote the article "Sex Every Day or Even More Often" attacking the Church teaching on birth control has any qualms about pointing the finger at skeletons in others' closets?
That's a fair question.
I'm sure the magazine will stand or fall on its own merits as magazines are wont to do.
I find it hard to comment either way without knowing whether this was over the one episode or are there others... can't take 'off the record' unsourced material too seriously.
Not so much here as on some of the blogspots, it is amazing to read the reactions to this (and the original NCR slimey story) sorry mess. More circular firing squads amongst the non-liberal Catholics.
I think the reason is, that despite all the self-criticism of the debate here on FR, we are truly concerned with the essentials of the Catholic faith. The debate really gets down to the nitty-gritty. For those, however, who are more tied up in the political culture, then the fall of someone like Deal Hudson is a major, major event. It's ironic that on a political website like FR, the Catholics would be less politically inclined and more concerned with doctrines rather than personalities.
Well, when a private sin is made public and the figure it concerns is a public persona, these things happen, they should happen - although in this case I think NCR should have refrained since the sin seems to have been repented and repaid (losing his career as a professor plus the $$ settlement). I'm sure NCReporter published what they did for a political reason. I am assuming this is a one-time failing on Hudson's part until and if the facts are known.
One more reason to be glad we are not public figures whose past repented sins are fair game to some with axes to grind.
Amy Welborn's blogspot has a lot of ongoing back and forth on this - some attended the event and dispute the newspaper account, some are liberals and some are traditionalists... spans the spectrum of us.
Thanks for the link. Very interesting discussion going on over there.
Crisis has been declining in quality for some time. Hudson should not have been entrusted with such a prominent and public leadership position with that kind of problem in his background. Seems like they need to work on the vetting procedures at Crisis just like in the chanceries and seminaries. A tragi-comic farce.
God can do the forgiving. Converts who jockey for position and power in church institutions need to be screened more carefully just like the clergy.
Crisis should return back to more what it was like in the '80s when it had a real edge under the name Catholicism in Crisis. McInerny, Novak, and Schall did a good job with the product back then.
The church as a whole needs to get back in touch with real Catholicism and real Catholic intellectual culture.
"If it looks goofy, kooky, and absurd, chances are it might be. Heads up, everyone!"
Is NCR a leftist type "Cathlolic" paper?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.