Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEMOCRATS ADOPT THE "O.J." DEFENSE
Federal Review ^ | 9/21/04

Posted on 09/21/2004 2:53:32 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Now that a connection has been established between Bill Burkett, the CBS source in the forged documents story, and Kerry advisors Joe Lockhart and Max Cleland, the Democrat National Committee has gone into a furious, and some would say desperate, "spin" mode.

DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe has even issued a statement all but accusing the Republicans of forging the anti-Bush memos themselves:

“In today’s New York Post, Roger Stone, who became associated with political ‘dirty tricks’ while working for Nixon, refused to deny that he was the source the CBS documents. Will ...the White House admit today what they know about Mr. Stone’s relationship with these forged documents? Will they unequivocally rule out Mr. Stone’s involvement? Or for that matter, others with a known history of dirty tricks, such as Karl Rove or Ralph Reed?”

McAuliffe's statement is both illogical and counterproductive.

It's illogical because, to believe that Republicans forged the documents, you need to believe that the G.O.P. would forge documents attacking their candidate, leak them to the Democrats and/or CBS News, wait for CBS to air them and assume, hope and/or pray that some blogger, "sitting in his living room in his pajamas", would make history by convincing the world that CBS News aired forged documents.
You need to believe that the G.O.P. would count on these bloggers getting other "mainstream" news sources to pick up on the story and help discredit the Democrats and CBS.
And, finally, you need to believe that these Republican operatives, these calculating geniuses, were willing to bet that these pajama-clad cyber warriors would accomplish all this before the documents did irreparable damage to President Bush.

In addition to being based on such a wildly improbable scenario, this latest statement by the Democrats is, to say the least, counter-productive.

Normally, when a damaging story surfaces in an election, the best way to deal with it, especially once denials are impossible, is to change the topic and/or let the story die down ("move on," some might say).

However, by accusing the Republicans of attacking their own candidate in order to "frame" the Democrats, McAuliffe just opened up a whole new reason to keep talking about this story. This is bad for the Democrats for several reasons, not the least of which being that it distracts from other issues. It also creates a scenario under which the casual observer might begin associating the story, and the forging of the documents, not with CBS (which has apologized and would, presumably, like to "move on"), but with the Kerry campaign itself.

Given the above, it is difficult to fathom why McAuliffe would make this wild and unbelievable attack in the first place...unless, like O.J. Simpson, he has no choice but to hope we believe him when he says he's searching for the "real" culprits.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: burkett; bush; cbs; cleland; democrat; dnc; guard; mapes; mcauliffe; national; oj; projection; rather; simpson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: billhilly
There we have it Freepers. What a magnificent word play. Should we claim it? I vote yes.

Nah. "Pajamahudeen" is too clunky and close to "Mujahideen." Between you and me, I don't consider any comparison to Islamist guerrillas to be all that flattering.

I say stick with what works: Freepers.

41 posted on 09/21/2004 3:25:47 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Religion of Peace ISN'T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"Hopefully McAuliffe will keep his job."

Got my vote... Terry Mc is the best thing going for the Republicans.

"stupid and masochistic is no way to go through life..."
42 posted on 09/21/2004 3:25:59 PM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dvldog03
"Chubacca is a wookie, but he lives on Endor"... You must acquit

That does not make sense! None of this makes sense! Therefore, you must aquit!

43 posted on 09/21/2004 3:26:11 PM PDT by GaltMeister (I'm just a Pajamahadeen cog in the wheels of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dvldog03
"Chubacca is a wookie, but he lives on Endor"... You must acquit

That does not make sense! None of this makes sense! Therefore, you must aquit!

44 posted on 09/21/2004 3:26:11 PM PDT by GaltMeister (I'm just a Pajamahadeen cog in the wheels of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister

Oooops ... careful with the mouse button there, sporty.


45 posted on 09/21/2004 3:26:48 PM PDT by GaltMeister (I'm just a Pajamahadeen cog in the wheels of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

What is with the suicidal tendencies? Why not just say that it's awful tha someone would try to play dirty and move on? Wh make yourself look like a loon and keep the story going?


46 posted on 09/21/2004 3:27:59 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This can only mean that a more direct connection to the Kerry campaign is soon to be revealed. The Dems are trying to muddy the waters beforehand.


47 posted on 09/21/2004 3:30:38 PM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If you forge, you must be George.


48 posted on 09/21/2004 3:30:55 PM PDT by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Perhaps Edwards can "channel" the forger like he did the unborn child. That way we can know the "truth" of the matter.


49 posted on 09/21/2004 3:31:50 PM PDT by Thom Pain (Quisling - from Vidkun Quisling (1887-1945), a synonym for "traitor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
McAuliffe's statement is both illogical and counterproductive. It's illogical because, to believe that Republicans forged the documents, you need to believe that the G.O.P. would forge documents attacking their candidate, leak them to the Democrats and/or CBS News, wait for CBS to air them and assume, hope and/or pray that some blogger, "sitting in his living room in his pajamas", would make history by convincing the world that CBS News aired forged documents. You need to believe that the G.O.P. would count on these bloggers getting other "mainstream" news sources to pick up on the story and help discredit the Democrats and CBS. And, finally, you need to believe that these Republican operatives, these calculating geniuses, were willing to bet that these pajama-clad cyber warriors would accomplish all this before the documents did irreparable damage to President Bush.

Yeah, and your point is...?

This is how Democrats think everybody thinks all the time.

-PJ

50 posted on 09/21/2004 3:44:15 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I'll never forget the OJ juror who voted for acquittal because "there was too much evidence!"


51 posted on 09/21/2004 3:48:03 PM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zip

ping


52 posted on 09/21/2004 3:52:34 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
This was on the OpinionJournal on Friday off of another thread. I just borrowed it and butchered it. It's Pajamahadeen.

Pajamahadeen Rule... rise of the New Media

53 posted on 09/21/2004 3:56:27 PM PDT by Jaded ((Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
GOP response to Democrats' "OJ Defense" . . .

The quality of that forgery was so bad that only a Democrat could have created it.

54 posted on 09/21/2004 3:57:52 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe has even issued a statement all but accusing the Republicans of forging the anti-Bush memos themselves


55 posted on 09/21/2004 4:00:09 PM PDT by spodefly (A bunny-slippered operative in the Vast Right-Wing Pajama Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Add into that the Democrats' operation "Fortunate Son" which, by striking coincidence, was just ready to begin in earnest mere days after the CBS report.


56 posted on 09/21/2004 4:13:47 PM PDT by thoughtomator ("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
"The Dems are trying to muddy the waters beforehand."

Yes, they are. It's another wonderful liberal idiot conspiracy theory. The evil Rove is behind it all!

57 posted on 09/21/2004 5:30:19 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
However, by accusing the Republicans of attacking their own candidate in order to "frame" the Democrats, McAuliffe just opened up a whole new reason to keep talking about this story.

Gee and another in a long list of "whole new reasons" to NEVER vote for democrats.

58 posted on 09/21/2004 5:37:29 PM PDT by Bullish (Tick... Tick...Tick...Tick...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Terry McDim rides again. A few more years with McDim at the helm and the democrats will be sitting on the shelf next to the Whigs.


59 posted on 09/21/2004 5:39:28 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask the country what it will do for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
I say stick with what works: Freepers.

I second that!

No islamofascist crapola tags for us...

We're FReepers!

And we're proud!

60 posted on 09/21/2004 5:54:59 PM PDT by Bullish (Tick... Tick...Tick...Tick...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson