His great-grand-nephew is running for POTUS...with the same "strategy"...APPEASEMENT!
Posted on 09/21/2004 7:04:02 AM PDT by tjwmason
Britain's ambassador to Italy, who claimed President Bush was al-Qa'eda's "best recruiting sergeant", has distanced himself from the comments.
Sir Ivor Roberts's comments were apparently made during a closed doors Anglo-Italian conference at the weekend.
The meeting was covered by so-called Chatham House Rules which mean all speeches made by delegates are off the record.
But leading Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera decided Sir Ivor's comments were so significant that it breached the rules to publish them yesterday.
According to the newspaper, Sir Ivor said: "George W Bush is the best recruiting sergeant for al-Qa'eda.
"If there is anyone ready to celebrate his eventual re-election it is al-Qa'eda."
Sir Ivor was speaking at an annual conference in Pontignano, near Siena, on the theme of terrorism.
Guests at the event included Neil Kinnock and Chris Patten, Britain's outgoing European Union commissioners.
But Sir Ivor, 58, has sought to distance himself from the comments, saying: "These remarks as reported do not reflect my personal views."
A Foreign Office spokesman could not confirm reports that Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, is considering taking disciplinary action against Sir Ivor.
The spokesman said: "We will not comment on remarks made allegedly by Sir Ivor Roberts other than to say that they do not represent British Government policy."
Sir Ivor started his Foreign Office career in 1968. Before taking up his post in Rome he served as British ambassador in Belgrade and Dublin. He is married with two sons and one daughter.
I wondered whatever happened to Nevel Chamberlin (sp).
Sir Ivor is probably going to get transferred to a consulate in Siberia...
Yeah. Most organizations would love it if someone were to capture or kill 3/4 of its members.
John Kerry and his spokesmen have said the same thing. Perhaps Ivor Roberts is one of the "foreign leaders" that Kerry considers as supportive of his candidacy.
In fact the Kerry campaign is so reckless that sentiments like this one can probably be found on his website or campaign mailings.
Well, it's not a good thing to say, but it probably is, to some extent, true. When (not if) President Bush is re-elected, the Al-Q recruiters won't have to explain who he is and or why their young thugs should committ to jihad. All the old propaganda will still be usable and the "evils" of infidels in Saudi Arabia and/or Iraq won't have to be re-explained.
What a misleading headline. I kept reading to find where Bush had made a gaffe that was being downplayed. A more accurate headline might have been "... Plays Down Anti-Bush Insult".
There was no gaffe, there was a deliberate insult.
Nice misleading headline.
Unless you happen to be an organization that is looking to recruit suicide 'martyrs.' Then of course, the re-election of 'W' is a good thing.
Kind of hard to get the Jihad Juices flowing when the Great Satan has a French appeaser at the helm.
"If there is anyone ready to celebrate his eventual re-election it is al-Qa'eda."
I like the part about W's eventual re-election. It's like its a foregone conclusion.
His great-grand-nephew is running for POTUS...with the same "strategy"...APPEASEMENT!
Roberts is a Socialist. He thought he was among his friends--all Eurosocialists. He didn't think it would be published.
Tony Blair backed us in Iraq, but the British Labour party, and Blair too, were much happier when clinton was in office.
Notice that Kinnock and Patten were there--two other Socialist Euro-swines.
I rather liked Patten in the Hong Kong days. At least he meant well, even if he screwed up in the end. Maybe he couldn't help but screw up because Britain lacked the resolve to face down China.
As a bigwig in the European Uberbureaucracy he has been intolerable. There no longer seem to be any redeeming qualities.
Yup, times were tough for al-Qa’eda when they ran Afghanistan were receiving money hand over fist from the Saudi’s, Saddam and Arabs wordwide.
They were just hoping and praying they could be in their present circumstances!
/sarcasm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.