Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheGeezer

Here it is from Drudge

STATEMENT FROM DAN RATHER:

Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.

Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.


27 posted on 09/20/2004 9:01:52 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pete

I still want to know why they are planning to interview from the culprit. CBS should have apoligized to the President also.


37 posted on 09/20/2004 9:02:49 AM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
"We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry."

Game, set, match...

38 posted on 09/20/2004 9:02:57 AM PDT by Nexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Too little too late. Credibility zero.


40 posted on 09/20/2004 9:03:14 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Why didn't he just come out and say, "hit me here"?


47 posted on 09/20/2004 9:04:21 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("The message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

And who ever had "mistakes were made" wins the office pool as having the response most closely matching Dan's.

55 posted on 09/20/2004 9:07:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (CBS, admit defeat and bow to the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

So that's it. Move on, folks-- nothing else to see here. The End. How 'bout them Yankees?


57 posted on 09/20/2004 9:07:32 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

"....in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism. .."

And thus we may expect Dan Rather to interview John O'Neil of the SwiftVets on ...... ??


62 posted on 09/20/2004 9:08:07 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

What a pathetice pos. blather is....

He should not only resign, he should state where they got the memos from, how the DNC and the kerry campaign collabarated in this charade.

This story is not over, it is just beginning....

Keep up the heat folks....

Regards,
Joe


63 posted on 09/20/2004 9:08:12 AM PDT by Sonar5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Rush reading it now.


71 posted on 09/20/2004 9:08:50 AM PDT by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete; All

I will NEVER watch CBS "News", or ANY program on See BS again. I urge every freeper to turn them off.


77 posted on 09/20/2004 9:09:03 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
I don't see the part in this statement (to get people like Juan Williams to SHUT UP) that says "We apologize to the President for implying in this story that he had disobeyed the order of a superior officer."

EVEN IN THE LAST WEEK Rather continued to insist that there was a story here! CBS MUST apologize for that.

84 posted on 09/20/2004 9:09:54 AM PDT by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

Then why did you present your expert as someone who verified the authenticity of the documents, when all along he was only examining the signature?

You knew the document was only a copy, so therefore you intentionally had someone compare the signatures on a COPY

99 posted on 09/20/2004 9:11:10 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (POP - Political Operative in Pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Here's the key part:

trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

100 posted on 09/20/2004 9:11:13 AM PDT by EggsAckley (............."........let them go naked for a while".......scary Terri Kerry............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

and you reposted the complete text of the article of this thread because ....?


102 posted on 09/20/2004 9:11:18 AM PDT by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Love his selective use of perpective:

"we promised.... that we would...I no longer have...that would allow us to...I find we have been misled...our source...leads me to...if I knew then what I know now—I would not have...and I certainly...But we did...We made a mistake...I am sorry...important to us...our ability and our commitment..."

What a crappy piece of CYA writing. Looks like Rather wrote this himself and no one else would touch it.


150 posted on 09/20/2004 9:16:31 AM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Now that they have admitted the documents were forgeries they are no longer under any ethical obligation to conceal their source.

WHO WAS THE SOURCE, DAN?


182 posted on 09/20/2004 9:18:54 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! ("When the going gets weird, anchor men punt." - Dan Rather, election 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

When did C-BS get a new tradition. Must have been within the last 24 hours.

261 posted on 09/20/2004 9:29:42 AM PDT by MontanaBeth (NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Dan the Man:

...leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now (that I would get caught)—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question...

396 posted on 09/20/2004 9:50:30 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson