WE will get her to admit she typed them!
Posted on 09/15/2004 1:59:55 PM PDT by gobucks
Howlin set a great example last sept 8th when he started a live thread for the 60 minutes II story.
Let's see how much squirmin we here ....
Don't tease me. :(
DNCBS Death watch PING.
Some information could be true incidentally. For instance Bush was in the ANG.
However, one could forge a NASA document that claimed there was a conspiracy to cover up the fact that the moon was made of cheese. It doesn't mean there is a news story there.
I've only seen that in one article...the others still show bias but without the DNC spin. Which of these nonsence articles are we supposed to believe?
lol
Hannity just said he got an email from "inside" cbs source saying the response could be a 2 hr deal. Possible on the nightly news?
Anyone else hear all of this? I just caught part of it.
Cheers!
..."Mornin, Reverend..."
Hey, I'm way ahead of you.
" Relative clauses can be introduced by:
* a relative pronoun: who (whom), which, that, whose
* no relative pronoun, Ø.
* where, why and when instead of a relative pronoun
You need to consider the following when deciding which relative pronoun to use:
* Is the subject or object or possessive of a relative clause?
* Does it refers to a person or an object?
* Is the relative clause a defining or non-defining relative clause?
NOTE: Relative clauses are often used in both spoken and written English. There is a tendency to use non-defining relative clauses mostly in written, rather than in spoken, English. "
Evidently, you did good in your English classes. I bet your teachers, who are all still teaching I bet, would be proud of you.
LOL
IMHO, Dan is done shouldn't get CBS off the hook.
Where did these forgeries come from...that's what I want to know!
They can probably get a lawyer to say 'You have items that are purportedly PRIVATE PROPERTY of Col. Killian and I want a full list of what you have thay MAY be his property and how you came to have these stolen items!'. Then they would have to cop to the fakes or face receiving stolen property.
why does drudge haev a blurb that President Bush stayed in the white house today. What is that trying to imply?
Our local CBS just did a story on it, and said CBS was expected to make the 5oclock announcement, but didnt, and that more information will be available on the evening news. Hmm...
Yes, it is real. I believe it was posted on Kerry's campaign web site. He was proud of his long association with the Kennedy clan. There are several others as well.
Wait until Jim Baker's law firm, Phil Beck and the rest, gets involved. THEN you will see the DNC and CBS lawyers soiling themselves like Teddy Kennedy.
Good thing you didn't mention moose!
No. Libel does not survive death; you can say whatever you want about dead people.
Stoudt, on the other hand, might well have a suit for defamation. But from what I know of his character, he'd never pursue it.
WE will get her to admit she typed them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.