Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Still Say Bush Dishonored Guard
Democratic National Committee Website ^ | Sept 13, 2004 | Democratic National Committee

Posted on 09/13/2004 6:39:21 PM PDT by gortklattu

McPeak and Turner: Bush Dishonored the National Guard Then, Dishonoring Guard Now

General and Admiral Offer Pre-Buttal to Bush’s National Guard Speech

Washington, D.C. - After a week of new revelations regarding George W. Bush’s military service in the National Guard and just one day before Bush will address the National Guard Association in Las Vegas, General Tony McPeak and Admiral Stansfield Turner called on the President to answer questions about his time in the National Guard and also to own up to his failed record for the National Guard as President. Statements from McPeak and Turner below:

(Excerpt) Read more at democrats.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushguard; democratsarescum; napalminthemorning; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Bush dishonored the Guard because he deserted it (by obtaining an honorable discharge from an over-manned unit after Kerry lost the war for his country) rather than defecting from it (as John Kerry did to the Navy). He was dishonorable for failing to commit treason. Heck, Bush probably could have bombed Dallas and Houston for the heck of it if he were so inclined. That would have been honorable.

Understand? Treason is honorable; serving your country according to applicable rules and regulations constitutes desertion, a heinous crime punishable by death.

To understand these truths, as Democrats call the fallacious propaganda of enemies of the United States, all one needs to do is read the thesis of TREASON by ANN COULTER. When she wrote the book, it was a hyperbole, but today it might be an understatement. What would you call a party who appoints a notorious traitor to be its presidential candidate? Certainly not a winner.

When you understand that the Democrats are the Party of Treason, propagandizing for a Traitor as their Presidential nominee, then you can interpret properly the statements made by members of that Party and identify most of its membership, even their covert allies, by their continuously seditious statements and various other lies (and their sexual promiscuity, but that's another issue for another missive).
21 posted on 09/13/2004 6:55:03 PM PDT by dufekin (President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969, when Kerry first committed treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Talk about failed duty, Turner can speak volumes about that...just ask anyone who worked at the CIA when he was doing the peanut farmer's bidding!


22 posted on 09/13/2004 6:55:24 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Terry Mc: "I think it's true, I think it's true, I think it's true........".


23 posted on 09/13/2004 6:55:25 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

Hannity had Dick Morris on and he said something like, Kerry is stupid to stay on this subject.


24 posted on 09/13/2004 6:56:05 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Wonder what the Guard thinks of Kerry using it to attack the President. Never mind. I don't have to wonder about it at all.


25 posted on 09/13/2004 6:57:28 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
I find it odd that a rich kid, whose father has all of these connections and can pull all of these strings, left the Guard knowing how to fly a fighter jet.

I guess he should have been doing something more honorable, such as going to England and Russia, organizing protests against the United States.

26 posted on 09/13/2004 6:57:40 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
Gosh, I'm simply amazed at how liberals are so concerned about the importance of military service TODAY as opposed to oh, I don't know....12 years ago when they insisted that 'loathing the military' was no big deal.

My, how their standards flip flop with the times.

They can say what they want about Bush's service in the Guard....it simply won't matter. The Vietnam veterans are going to hand Effin' his long ugly head on a platter in November.

27 posted on 09/13/2004 6:58:44 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Isn't it something, how Kerry trashing the "band of brothers" upon his return can simply be shrugged off as a "youthful indiscretion?"


28 posted on 09/13/2004 6:59:58 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Enough already. The Dems should reserve their slime for 2008 when Hillary assumes the throne and makes her bid for the White House. They're gonna need all of it to get her across the finish line. 2008 is gonna be a thriller.


29 posted on 09/13/2004 6:59:59 PM PDT by midftfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

All of this horse manure about where these two were 30+ years ago is wearing thin! Which one of the two candidates will be best for our future as a country? Which one shows up for duty now? Which one is decisive? Which one has best protected this country in the last 3 years? Which one is the realist? Which one is the opportunist? Which one do you feel most comfortable with? Which one, considering that both are politicians, is telling the truth? IMHO, it sure as hell is not John F'n Kerry.......................


30 posted on 09/13/2004 7:00:19 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno

I knew, when W didn't single out the SBVs, that the Dims and their PR department, known as the MSM, would haul out something like this.


31 posted on 09/13/2004 7:01:49 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
Democrats Still Say Bush Dishonored Guard

I still say democRATS dishonored the military.

We will see on Nov 2 (Or 3rd. No longer than that) who's right.

5.56mm

32 posted on 09/13/2004 7:01:58 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
We shall see what the National Guard thinks tomorrow when Bush speaks.

For the next 50 days, Bush should give a speech a day in front of a National Guard audience.

33 posted on 09/13/2004 7:05:09 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

My only fear is that Bush will get "kerry'd" on this issue, meaning because he is not refuting these false charges, (not that the ones against Kerry were false) that he will lose his standing. Remember all the analysts think that one of KErry's biggest problem was that he didn't fight back against the swiftees. And I ahve no faith in the average voter to investigate these claims either, which is sad. I'd like to see the President come forward and say something to put a stop to all this TANG stuff.


34 posted on 09/13/2004 7:06:07 PM PDT by rocky88 (" John Kerry has no such clear, precise and consistent vision." - Rudy Guiliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
Hannity had Dick Morris on and he said something like, Kerry is stupid to stay on this subject.

Kerry is making even Dick Morris seem like a genius.

35 posted on 09/13/2004 7:06:27 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Here's the deal: Kerry and the Dems are totally unprincipled vermin. They know nothing of honesty, decency, or honor. They do know that their boy got knocked down a couple of pegs by the Swiftvets and their attacks on Kerry's phony-war-hero shtick.

The problem is that because they lack a moral compass, they can't see their way clear of the mess they've made for themselves. They mistakenly think the problem is that Kerry didn't go on the attack against the Swiftees soon enough. Whereas the problem is actually that Kerry is a contemptible fraud.

Nevertheless, in their own view, they figure if it worked against Kerry, it will work against the President. So they plan on attacking President Bush on his Guard service, on the contention that he wore a ribbon he didn't deserve, and on the claim that he was in the Air Force, but the Dems say he lied.

What idiots! Keep digging. They just don't get it.

President Bush IS honorable. There is no reason for him to be ashamed of his guard service, he was a fighter pilot, he earned the ribbons he wore, he was in the Air Force while on active duty in pilot training.

The Dems learned the wrong lesson. They think they learned to go on the attack. What they should have learned is don't nominate a fraud.


36 posted on 09/13/2004 7:07:10 PM PDT by OhMike (He which hath no stomach to this fight, let him depart...we would not die in that man's company.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

When I was a ship's captain in the navy, we had a guy who stole some strawberries...yes, strawberries....strawberries


37 posted on 09/13/2004 7:09:13 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John (http://www.bluestatesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocky88

Bush can't and won't get caught up in this argument. The White House said today that "Bush was Honorably Discharged"...case closed. Kerry and the gang are up the wrong tree.


38 posted on 09/13/2004 7:12:08 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Swift Boat Veterans for Truth


39 posted on 09/13/2004 7:13:45 PM PDT by Enduring Freedom (Freepers are Crusader Warriors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Capt Queeg, is that you?


40 posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:55 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson