Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather feeling Freeped, but standing by his story (Freep mentioned in left wing.)
Salon.com ^ | 9-10-04 | Geraldine Sealey

Posted on 09/13/2004 11:42:53 AM PDT by theSimpleTruth

Rather feeling Freeped, but standing by his story

Dan Rather appeared miffed that he even had to spend five minutes of his broadcast tonight responding to what he called the none-too-surprising counterattack led by partisan operatives against his 60 Minutes segment on Wednesday about Bush's Guard service. Putting the whole superscript frenzy into perspective, Rather recapped the central points of his piece: Did Ben Barnes use his influence to get Bush into the Guard? Did Bush refuse a direct order from his commanding officer? Was he suspended for failing to perform? Did he take his physical as ordered, and if not, why not? And did Bush complete his commitment to the Guard?

The 60 Minutes story was based, Rather reminds us, not just on documents but on new credible witnesses and other evidence. But the hype has centered on the memos. Some people, Rather said, "including many who are partisan political operatives," contend the documents are fake. Rather was not impressed with their arguments. "These critics have focused on something called superscript that automatically makes a raised 'th.' Critics claim it didn't exist," he said. But CBS showed one document not in dispute -- it looked like the document we linked to earlier -- that was released by the White House. The document is from 1968, but lo and behold, there is a raised, smaller "th."

Then there's the font question. "Some analysts outside CBS," as Rather called them, claim the font looks like Times New Roman, which they say was not available in the 1970s. CBS called the company that distributes this typing style, Rather said, and it turns out the style has been available since 1931.

.... (article truncated)

(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; danrather; guard; memos; national; rathergate; superscript; th; typewriter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Rather was freeped!
1 posted on 09/13/2004 11:42:55 AM PDT by theSimpleTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

The big story here is WHY?

Why is Dan Rather defending these obvious forgeries?


2 posted on 09/13/2004 11:43:54 AM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

Would you believe a
second-hand memo
from this man?

3 posted on 09/13/2004 11:44:35 AM PDT by syriacus (Kerry lied, while honorable men died. Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Here is contact info for some of the companies that sponsor CBS
Have at 'em
viagra
taco bell
campbells soup
L L Bean
Ambien
Iams
4 posted on 09/13/2004 11:46:37 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

Welcome to FR.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 11:47:43 AM PDT by mlbford2 ("I knocked on the door of this man's soul, and found somebody home"--Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

Ben Barnes is a proven nut case working with the Kerry campaign. Danny Rather, did he give you those memos?


6 posted on 09/13/2004 11:48:33 AM PDT by Mark (Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam
Why is Dan Rather defending these obvious forgeries?
Dude. I think Kurtz of NR offers the best hypothesis: it is not about partisanship so much as about revenues and audience share. Read it and weep bitter tears. Kurtz's analysis does not bode well for the good guys, or even for the not-so-good but they-try-really-hard guys. http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz200409131046.asp
7 posted on 09/13/2004 11:49:24 AM PDT by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth
Rather recapped the central points of his piece: Did Ben Barnes use his influence to get Bush into the Guard?

Why does this Barnes story even have legs? Barnes wasn't even Lt. Governor when Bush went into the Texas ANG! Barnes was serving the U.N. and wasn't Lt. Gov until 1969. Bush went into the ANG in 1968.

8 posted on 09/13/2004 11:49:33 AM PDT by Prime Choice (The Log Cabin Republicans AREN'T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

9 posted on 09/13/2004 11:49:58 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth
Exodus 20

16 "You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.

It has the same value as the other nine.

10 posted on 09/13/2004 11:51:28 AM PDT by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

Please include original titles.
Thanks.


11 posted on 09/13/2004 11:54:41 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

Because maybe his daughter Robin is seriously in head over heels in this Rathergate???


12 posted on 09/13/2004 11:56:20 AM PDT by Illinois Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth
Dan Rather appeared miffed that he even had to spend five minutes of his broadcast tonight responding to what he called the none-too-surprising counterattack led by partisan operatives against his 60 Minutes segment on Wednesday about Bush's Guard service.

Partisan operatives? Think "Americans", Donkey Dan.
13 posted on 09/13/2004 11:58:22 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thanks for the title fix. (I'm still learning)


14 posted on 09/13/2004 11:59:45 AM PDT by theSimpleTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

The most disturbing thing about this article is that you either had to pay money to Salon or you watched an advertisement to read it.


15 posted on 09/13/2004 12:00:43 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth

Guess the next edition of the OED will have to include the new verb "freep".


16 posted on 09/13/2004 12:03:54 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Donate to the Swift Vets -- www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Rather looks awful in that pic; you could deliver a lot of mail in those bags under his eyes.


17 posted on 09/13/2004 12:08:41 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth
With Apologies to Randy Newman

Pajama People

Pajama People got no reason
Pajama People got no reason
Pajama People got no reason
To live

They got little stubby fingers - little blurry eyes
They protest all day - postin' great big lies

They got snotty noses and coffee-stained teeth
They wear week-old underwear on their nasty little seat.

Well, I don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People `Round here

Pajama People are not the same as you and I (A Fool Such As I)
Good folk are liberals 'til the day they die (It's A Wonderful World)

Pajama People got nobody
Pajama People got nobody
Pajama People got nobody
To love

They got little beady eyes - and a furrowed brow
You gotta cuff their ears - just to say hello

They got little protest horns
That go beep, beep, beep

They're always saying
"Cheney's our veep, veep, veep!"

They got nasty little toes
hangin' from jammys below
We gotta make sure - it's their time to go.

Well, I don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
'Round here
18 posted on 09/13/2004 12:10:29 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illinois Rep
re post 12

yup, you got it.

19 posted on 09/13/2004 12:10:40 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: theSimpleTruth
Rather was Freeped

Direct link to story that doesn't go through advertising

20 posted on 09/13/2004 12:18:38 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson