Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here We Go Some More
The American Spectator ^ | 09-13-2004 | Washington Prowler

Posted on 09/12/2004 9:28:38 PM PDT by nyconse

While CBS news anchor Dan Rather can say there is no internal investigation under way over the alleged forged documents used as the foundation for an investigation into President George W. Bush's National Guard service, you wouldn't have been able to tell from the 15 or so 60 Minutes and CBS News" staffers working away feverishly on Friday and Saturday to try to nail down their story.

On Friday, according to CBS News sources, Rather spent the day on the phone and dealing with CBS suits who were nervous about the fall out from the story. "All Dan could say was that this was an attack from the right-wing nuts, and that we should have expected this, given the stakes," says a CBS News producer. "He was terribly defensive and nervous. You could tell."

All day Friday, Rather, his producer on the story, Mary Mapes, and other 60 Minutes staffers were scrambling to shore up support from their sources on the story. That effort didn't go so well. By Saturday, one of their key sources, retired Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, had said that CBS misled him, and that he had never been shown the memos in question.

"We pulled the trick of only calling some sources at the last minute to reconfirm," says the CBS producer. "Someone called Hodges, I think, on Monday night and read him parts of the document. The late contacts are a standard practice so we don't tip off the competition or our sources."

Hodges is a critical loss for CBS News' credibility. He was the superior officer of the man CBS claims wrote the memo, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who died in 1984.

MEANWHILE, OVER THE WEEKEND journalists from around the country were attempting to track down the original source of the documents. "We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producer. "There are at least two people in this building who have insisted we got copies of these memos from the Kerry campaign by way of an additional source. We do not have the originals, and our sources have indicated to us that we will not be getting the originals. How that is possible I don't know."

One individual several news outlets were looking at was Bill Burkett, a former Texas National Guard officer. Burkett in the past has cooperated with both press and Democratic Party opposition researchers in slinging mud at President Bush. Burkett gained some national attention earlier in the campaign when he claimed he was at National Guard headquarters in Austin 1997, when he overheard Guard officials and a representative of then Governor Bush discuss how to sanitize Bush's files. That story was fully discredited. Nonetheless, Burkett sat down for at least three different interviews with CBS News for the story now at the center of the controversy. One of those interviews was with Rather's producer, Ms. Mapes.

"There are rumors here that if there are any real documents, they are hand-written notes from Killian that someone like Burkett was holding, and that instead of using the hand-written notes, someone typed them up to look more official," says the CBS News producer. "They would look better on TV and posted on line if they were typed, but on a number of levels, that story just doesn't hold up. There are too many inconsistencies factually with what is in the memos."

THE MOST GLARING ISSUES now are the seemingly phony P.O. Box addresses used in the headers of at least one of the memorandums. Such post office box addresses were not used by the National Guard at that time, let alone a box with a number "34567," as in the memo.

Yet another issue: the 18-month gap between the retirement of Col. Walter "Buck" Staudt on March 1, 1972, and August 18, 1973, when the Killian of the disputed memos claimed that Staudt was putting pressure on him to sugarcoat an evaluation of Bush. Almost everyone involved in the National Guard in Texas says Staudt would have had virtually no influence in the active units nearly a year and a half after leaving the service.

PERHAPS MOST TROUBLING to the CBS News staff looking into how its story went off the rails is the timing of the memos' appearance. "Some 60 Minutes staffers have been working on this story for more than three years off and on," says the CBS News producer. "There have been rumors about these memos and what was in them for at least that long. No one had been able to find anything. Not a single piece of paper. But we know that a lot of people here interviewed a lot of people in Texas and elsewhere and asked very explicit questions about the existence of these memos. Then all of a sudden they show up? In one nice, neat package?"

This CBS New producer went on to explain that the questions 60 Minutes folk were asking were specific enough that people would have been able to fabricate the memorandums to meet the exact specifications the investigative journalists were looking for. "People were asking questions of sources like, 'Have you ever seen or heard of a memo that suspended Bush for failing to appear for a physical?' and 'Have you heard about or know of someone who has any documentation from back in the 1970s that shows there was pressure to get Bush into the National Guard?' It was like they were placing an order for a ready-made product. That is the biggest problem I have with this. It's all too neat and perfect for what we needed. Without these exact pieces of paper, we don't have a story. Dan has as much as admitted that. Everyone knows it. We were at a standstill on this story until these memos showed up."

REPORTERS ARE ALSO LOOKING at staff and associates of Sen. Tom Harkin, who enthusiastically held a press conference on Thursday morning using the forged documents as the tent pole for attacks against President Bush. Harkin called Bush a "liar."

"Harkin has been pushing this story for a while," says the CBS producer. "Not this specific story, but the 'Bush is a liar about his record' story. His people seemed particularly interested in making sure they could keep their boss up to date on what was going on."

That Harkin was the individual selected to be the attack dog on this particular issue was an interesting one, give that Harkin himself has a checkered history about telling the truth about his involvement in the Vietnam War.

WITH MORALE AT WHAT some Kerry campaign insiders consider an all-time low, Sen. John Kerry, who unlike Tom Harkin did serve in Vietnam, did what any true leader does. He sets up a conference call. During the Labor Day weekend, during meetings with senior staff, campaign director Mary Beth Cahill suggested to the candidate that he try to buck up the troops, since the media onslaught against him, as well as the dipping poll numbers, were affecting staff in Washington and in satellite offices around the country. Kerry acknowledged their concerns by gathering the Washington staff into the central office space in their McPherson Square suites and speaking to them via speaker phone. Kerry told them that things were going well on the road. The crowds were enthusiastic, and he could feel the campaign was moving in the right direction with the new senior staff additions.

"He actually said that he felt the campaign had turned the corner," says a Washington-based staffer. "Some of us couldn't help but laugh given that he's made fun of Bush for saying the same thing. You hear stuff like that and you just feel sick. You look over at people like [Joe] Lockhart and Cahill and they seem to understand it too."

Kerry further undercut his own efforts, when he hung up his side of the call before any questions could be asked by staff members.

"[Kerry] doesn't seem to want to acknowledge that he has problems," says the staffer. "I'm low level, but there are a few people here who have stopped coming in to work or to volunteer. We've got some issues, and the guy who should be trying to help fix it doesn't seem to care."

Cahill seems to understand this. On Thursday, since the candidate wouldn't face his own staff, Cahill pulled out the big guns. She invited her old boss, Sen. Ted Kennedy down to the Washington offices to further raise the morale of Kerry's staff.

Kennedy actually said little about Kerry, beyond the fact that he was a fighter who would continue fighting. After mentioning Kerry, Kennedy then went on a 10-minute diatribe about President Bush. "His face was turning red, he was really getting into it," says the Kerry staffer. "Then the next day we saw him make the same speech on the floor of the Senate. Guess we were the dress rehearsal."

THERE ARE OTHER PROBLEMS with the Kerry campaign. According to several Kerry and DNC sources, Kerry advisers have been furiously holding focus group meetings in an attempt to find some issue of national concern that might cut their way in the coming weeks. But nothing they've looked at seems to be working. Of course, even if they were to find something there is no guarantee their man would run with it.

For example, some media types thought having his old pal John Sasso along on the road would help focus Kerry a bit more on his stump speeches. Judging by Kerry's performance last Thursday in North Carolina, they're not sure anymore. While talking about the economy, health-care policy, Kerry went off speech and began stumbling immediately. Kerry said that he would always tell the public the truth, and if the audience didn't believe him, they could "[g]o to a web site. It can be johnkerry.com or go some other place. Go to truth.com, if there is one, and find out what's really happening," Kerry said.

I just know this is going to go back to the DNC or some Dem partisan like Harkins-Dem=liars. Someone knew what CBS wanted and like a good samaritan supplied...the fake memos.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; killian; memo; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; presbush; rather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-323 next last
To: nyconse
And I think to myself,
what a wonderful world.
101 posted on 09/12/2004 10:13:31 PM PDT by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom_Busch
really can't believe what I'm reading here. We don't know who are source is. And the source, even though we don't know who it is, tells us we won't be getting the originals. If they don't know who the source is, how do they know the source is saying no originals are coming. Boy, Dan Rather and company are some first class journalists alright.

They got them from the Kerry Campaign--. Forged documents from the Kerry Campaign-- to smear the President. Imagine If the RNC had done this to a sitting Dem President, using Brit Hume and Fox News. In all reality, this is bigger than Watergate.

Maybe Kerry should have kept his Vietnam era typewriter he probably could have done a better job with his experience in writing up awards and reports....hmm maybe he just got lazy and used a PC...

Really after all the going over that Kerry got for his awards, for CBS to broadcast this without a real live polygraphed and identified source plus back-up source is plain stupid..now I know gambling affects partisan journalists..first greed for the big headline story, now fear of being found out..LOL..

102 posted on 09/12/2004 10:13:55 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

This post is so true...they got them from Kerry...now Harkin may have given them to Kerry...after he found someone to fake them...who faked them? Some retired military guy?


103 posted on 09/12/2004 10:14:56 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Ben Barnes said under oath in 1999 that neither Bush Sr. nor W. ever contacted him or discussed the National Guard with him. He did say he was approached by a friend of the family, though.

His daughter, however, says that in 2000 he told her he never helped Bush get into the guard. She is adamant that she asked him directly during the election, and that he told her it never happened.


104 posted on 09/12/2004 10:15:06 PM PDT by Hank All-American (Free Men, Free Minds, Free Markets baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

> This is the most encouraging line ...

There are several. Here's another:

"... since the media onslaught against him, as well as
the dipping poll numbers, were affecting staff in
Washington and in satellite offices around the country."

Are the rats deserting the ship?

Probably inflicting paper cuts on themselves to
collect purple hearts so they can pack up and go home.


105 posted on 09/12/2004 10:15:17 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
"Kerry told them that things were going well on the road. The crowds were enthusiastic, and he could feel the campaign was moving in the right direction with the new senior staff additions."

He did express a little confusion over why the crowds that have greeted him have been enthusiastically chanting "Barabbas, Barabbas!" to him. One of his advisors reportedly told him it was apparently a reference to some silly Bible story where the mob chose a criminal over Jesus. But the advisor was the same one who told him to tell a special interest group his favorite Bible verse is John 16:3, so he really couldn't shed any light on why the mobs have started referring to the senator by that name.

106 posted on 09/12/2004 10:15:53 PM PDT by intolerancewillNOTbetolerated (Throw The Obstructionists Out Of Congress Bush/Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I agree. CBS is hoping against hope that the news cycle will move on.

They were desperately hoping for this story to be blown away by Hurricane Ivan, I think. When the forgeries blew up in their faces, Ivan was supposed to be getting ready to hit the Florida Keys right about now. Unfortunately for them, Ivan has slowed down and moved to the west, and if it hits Florida at all it won't be until the middle of the week. So now they have to play out the string that much longer.

107 posted on 09/12/2004 10:15:56 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

LOL!


108 posted on 09/12/2004 10:16:42 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: shadowman99
If CBS had said "these documents have been re-typed for reading clarity" the damage would be greatly reduced.

Somehow, I do think that point was raised by the CBS corporate counsel. Right before they said to Dan, 'So these are forgeries. Hmmm.'
109 posted on 09/12/2004 10:17:20 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Daddy, are there bad men on your planes?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: p. henry; Howlin; Travis McGee; Buckhead; JohnHuang2
"How can CBS not know how they received the documents and yet have sources that tell them that they will not receive the originals?"

p. henry, that's the post of the day! Nice job.

The AWB Has Expired - Gun Owners Have Won Again For All Americans!

110 posted on 09/12/2004 10:17:40 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
So make your choice Dan, who dies over this fiasco: Rather&CBS or Kerry?

Hmmm..... Maybe CBS and the democratic document fakers could talk Burkett into taking the fall. Burkett seems bitter enough to admit to the whole fraud and take the fall under certain conditions. Like CBS doing a whole hour on him and how Bush stole his medical benefits. And in his own screwed up mind he might believe this might be enough to throw the election in Kerry's favor. A win-win situation for the rats and their enablers at CBS.

111 posted on 09/12/2004 10:17:56 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

I think some in the Media realize their credibility is at stake here completely...and don't want to help CBS rearragne the deck chairs on the titanic...heard that today quite applicable.


112 posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:08 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Khan Noonian Singh

If Kerry can be connected to these forgeries...I don't think it will matter much. Kerry's campaign is over.


113 posted on 09/12/2004 10:19:33 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Wow! Dan Rather just got b!!ch slapped by William Saffire!!! It's going to be a great Monday!!!
114 posted on 09/12/2004 10:20:43 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producer."

Why, was Terry wearing glasses with a big plastic nose when he dropped them off?

115 posted on 09/12/2004 10:20:47 PM PDT by intolerancewillNOTbetolerated (Throw The Obstructionists Out Of Congress Bush/Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: swheats

"It's hard to conceive that a group of left wing Bush haters actually conspired to take down a sitting president with fake documents"

You forgot the /sarcasm thing.
You were joking right?
These rat-bastards would assassinate him if they thought they could get away with it.


116 posted on 09/12/2004 10:21:06 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
How has Barnes perjured himself?

Please. Anything with the potential to even slightly discredit the blogosphere on the issue of fake memos needs to be avoided at all costs. We have enough ammunition to fully discredit Rather, 60 Minutes and CBS News without making stuff up.

117 posted on 09/12/2004 10:21:08 PM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
This is so offensive to me. He just can't stop can he? Piece of partisan dirt!

I wonder if Rather has ever uttered the phrase "left-wing nuts" in his life.

118 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:03 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War (Calvinism Fever: Catch It! (Or don't. It's not like it's going to do you any good anyway...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yeah, this is just an incredible confession to make. They know an intermediary. How can they not know where they got them? What they really mean is, they can't show anybody they got them from that can withstand scrutiny. Obviously, since they are transparent forgeries. Then there was the line about frantically holding focus groups looking for some issue, any issue, of national concern that might cut their way. Think about it. In two months time, this man wants to be elected President of the United States. To figure out what he stands for, he is asking people pulled in off the street what they want him to say...
119 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:14 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Yeah, I don't believe for one minute there are any real handwritten notes.. What do you think?

Unless, of course, the handwriting belonged to someone other than Lt.Col. Killian. That would make it unhandy to produce them, wouldn't you think?

120 posted on 09/12/2004 10:24:42 PM PDT by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson