Skip to comments.
DNC TO LAUNCH FRESH ATTACK ON BUSH GUARD DUTY: WILL RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT 1978 CAMPAIGN LIT
The Drudge Report ^
| 9-12-04
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 09/12/2004 3:59:01 PM PDT by Crazieman
Edited on 09/12/2004 4:34:25 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN SEPT 12, 2004 19:02:38 ET XXXXX
DNC TO LAUNCH FRESH ATTACK ON BUSH GUARD DUTY: WILL RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT 1978 CAMPAIGN LIT
**Exclusive**
Faster than a CBS eye can blink, dogged Dems are set to take to the airwaves anew hoping to keep questions about President Bush's National Guard duty in play, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
Candidate Kerry apparently has rejected former President Clinton's advice not to get further locked in a 2004 Vietnam quagmire.
"George W. Bush's campaign literature claimed that he 'served in the U.S. Air Force.' The only problem? He didn't," slams a new DNC press release set for distribution.
Dems will attempt to increase the heat on Bush ahead of his planned Tuesday address before The National Guard Association gathering in Las Vegas.
In 2000, Bush opened his National Guard Association speech: "General, I am reporting for duty."
MORE
Kerry plans to speak to the group on Thursday, but he personally hold back questioning Bush's service, sources explain.
The coordinated nationwide effort this week by the DNC has been code-named "Project Fortunate Son."
"George Bush has a clear pattern of lying about his military service," DNC Communications Director Jano Cabrera blasts in the new release. "From 1978 to the present day, George Bush has refused to tell voters the truth about his service. It's time for the President to come clean."
"Flyers distributed to Texas voters during Bush's failed Congressional race say 'he served in the U.S. Air Force and the Texas Air National Guard.' But according to Air Force officials, Air National Guardsmen are not counted as members of the active-duty Air Force."
MORE
-----------------------------------------------------------
Filed By Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgereport.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2004
Not for reproduction without permission of the author
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deadhorse; democratsarescum; desperate; desperatedems; dnc; drudge; kerrystrategy; ltbush; memogate; napalminthemorning; pimpinghisradioshow; pointless; rathergate; sirenseverysunday; tang; whiteflag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 761-763 next last
To: EaglesUpForever
61
posted on
09/12/2004 4:09:31 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I want to die in my sleep like Gramps -- not yelling and screaming like those in his car)
To: Crazieman
They just don't get it.
Even if supposing, just supposing that some of their allegation agaist the President were true, first of all, he DID get an honorable discharge, so nothing could have been really bad; and second of all, IT DOESN'T MATTER.
Why doesn't it really matter?
It's because people already watched Bush BE President for 4 years, and watched him perform under tremendous, critical circumstances, watched him successfully lead the War on Terror, getting rid of the Taliban and deposing Saddam. they don't have to try to guess, based on what he did or didn't do 35 years ago, whether he is capable and resolute enought to lead us during these critical times. The answer is a resounding YES. Bush has already proven himself many times over.
But Kerry has NO track record, except his Senate record, where he voted against defense systems, voted to cut intelligence, didn't think we should fight communism, because he didn't think we could win, and Kerry is running for president, based on his Vietnam record. Well, in that case, it's only fair to examine that and his subsequent actions of his attacks on his fellow soldiers, when he called them war criminals and met with the communist Vietnamese.
62
posted on
09/12/2004 4:09:58 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
To: silverleaf
The most amusing thing about it is that it looks more authentic than the ones CBS is pushing.
63
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:11 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
To: Crazieman
Dead horse is right. The poor thing is a smoldering pulp, and still they bring whips. I do hope one good thing comes as a result of this. ONCE and for ALL, congressional republicans see the enemy clearly. And learn from W. and Rove how to deal effectively with them.
To: AZamericonnie
65
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:20 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Rather lied to ,misled he betrayed this country)
To: Lizavetta; All
They are going to release an old GWB campaign flyer from the 1970s that says he served in the USAF and the TANG. They already have this as the lead story on DU. They are going orgasmic over it, claiming that Bush lied in his campaign literature about having served in the US Air Force.
This is a big time bomb which was to be their October surprise, but given their collapsing polls, they have decided to bring it on now.
66
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:24 PM PDT
by
nwrep
To: Pajama Blogger Reader
Nice screen name!
Welcome aboard!
67
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:34 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: Use It Or Lose It
since they know there is an "October Surprise" from the Swift Boat Vets
Yep. Admission of war crimes.
68
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:39 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: newlibertarian2000
.is anyone else tired of hearing about swift boats and typewriters?...both of these political parties are getting on my nerves...The Swift Boat Vets are independent. They are not tied in any way to the Republican party.
69
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:41 PM PDT
by
alnick
(US forces armed with what? Spitballs??)
To: Shermy
The whole new new guard BS is DNC bounce control.
If anyone wants to see the truth watch the swift vets at 2am on Cspan. (or record it)
To: Crazieman
This does not make sense. Are the Democrats that stupid? There are many issues that voters are concerned with. Bush's NG more than thirty years is not one of them. You would think that after Clinton's evasion of military service and the scandal about the forged documents, the Democrats would want to have everyone forget this issue.
Could it be that it is a diversion for some other skeleton in Kerry's closet? Or simply utter stupidity?
71
posted on
09/12/2004 4:10:59 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Crazieman
Typical crazy leftest desperation.
Like.. I keep seeing something over on DU about Laura Bush killing someone in a car accident years ago, but I haven't ever seen it anywhere else so i'm sure is BS.
Does anyone have more info on this??
72
posted on
09/12/2004 4:11:09 PM PDT
by
Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
(The UN did such a great job with the Oil for Food program, let's let them run the whole country!)
To: silverleaf
LOL. Don't let Rather see that one. It will be on the evening news.
73
posted on
09/12/2004 4:11:17 PM PDT
by
keats5
To: silverleaf
74
posted on
09/12/2004 4:11:18 PM PDT
by
rineaux
(hardcore for W04)
To: Crazieman
On November 2, the bottom line and decision is to choose between these two approaches to the War on Terror:
75
posted on
09/12/2004 4:11:29 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
To: Toonces T. Cat
Bush went through pilot training through USAF UPT (Undergraduate pilot training). The Guard didn't replicate training -- too expensive. Bush trained at Moody AFB, in Georgia as part of the USAF.
Of course, W served in USAF, that's how he got his wings.
Now, they're just grasping at straws. Don't these guys over there know anything?
76
posted on
09/12/2004 4:12:00 PM PDT
by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
To: newlibertarian2000
The swift boat veterans are private citizens. They have nothing to do with the republican party.
77
posted on
09/12/2004 4:12:05 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: nwrep
I saw that earlier over there and they are sure it's their smoking gun.
So, is the ANG part of the USAF? I would think so because there's a big ANG base by my house and I know the USAF uses it also.
78
posted on
09/12/2004 4:12:20 PM PDT
by
jbarkley
To: Shermy
good points. the WH has been to passive on these forged memos, this "stay quiet while you enemy is destroying himself" is fine, except I'd think you'd find very few americans even know about this forgery story. sure, we know about it here, Fox News viewers, talk radio. but the sheeple? last week, when I are lunch with some co-workers, many of them thought this story was about Bush forging his guard records. they are clueless. so there is still plenty of room for the media and the Dems to continue lying, again and again. and that's exactly what they are going to do.
To: Crazieman
Well, the last atttack was thoroughly rotten. Fresh would be good.
80
posted on
09/12/2004 4:12:34 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 761-763 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson