Posted on 09/12/2004 3:07:13 AM PDT by The Bandit
Televangelist Paul Crouch, founder of the world's largest Christian broadcasting network, has waged a fierce legal battle to prevent a former employee from publicizing allegations that he and Crouch had a sexual encounter eight years ago.
Crouch, 70, is the president of Trinity Broadcasting Network, based in Orange County, whose Christian programming reaches millions of viewers around the world via satellite, cable and broadcast stations.
The source of the allegations against him is Enoch Lonnie Ford, who met Crouch at a TBN-affiliated drug treatment center in 1991 and later went to work for the ministry.
After Ford threatened to sue TBN in 1998, claiming that he had been unjustly fired, Crouch reached a $425,000 settlement with him. In return, Ford agreed, among other things, not to discuss his claim about a sexual encounter with the TV preacher.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Amen! These two are especially dangerous, having launched Benny Hinn and other golddiggers. They even add their own twists to scripture, all designed to enhance the one thing they are most interested in our doing: Tithing and Giving.
I have seen better looking drag queens in New Oleans, even while sober.
You aren't qualified to make that statement.
There's Robert Schuler in the background to of the Chrystal Cathedral. I'm not sure if that is fair, but I only have caught a glimpse of his show.
Sculler is not too much of a money grubber, but he IS a heretic.
This sh*t is a lie from the pit of hell.
Scientology
Sorry to interrupt, but does anybody know if the charges are true?
Read 1st Corinthians. We are to judge believers by their fruit. A person who eschews the gathering of the church surely is not exhibiting the fruit of one who is a believer. Of course, if you cannot go to church, the church can come to you. But every believer should be in a gathering. All of Paul's letters address this in some fashion.
(Warning: Long post but discusses a few things about TBN that would reflect on some knowledge of the Station vs. what has basically been reading and I am not condemning; some broadbrush types of remarks about Televangelists in general)
I think, Paul Crouch and his empire use to make big deals about the fullfillment of Biblical Prophecy by broadcasting all over the world;
Before someone says, "you watched it", well, there are small towns that do not have many local stations but TBN is still there.
Hal Lindsey was on their a lot, author of "The late great planet earth";
I also remember, they would have this Pianist Dino who was a bit "Liberace" like;
But I'll say, I never gave any money to them, but in all humility, I am not going to set myself up to make unkind personal remarks towards them, critical yes, but not going overboard.
A lot of those shows were on TBN like Jack Van Impe, Benny Hin, etc.
You will find some books too, by Crouch including "The OmegaCode" etc. which I managed to read after purchasing it well discounted.
I never found Crouch to be, like some others, to be highly critical of others, but I can confidently feel, that as to this current accuser, they are probably up on the stage and calling it "an assault by Satan" or something similar.
They've sure got the bucks, I'll be honest and saying, I've watched some of the shows but never sent them money and did not find it responding to my religious needs. This is all a hot topic for all. I mean Pat Robertson's still on, things like that.
Where sin abounds, grace much more abounds. God is still on the throne and believers are still living in a fallen world in daily need of God's mercy.
This is all a hot topic for all. I mean Pat Robertson's still on, things like that.
Yes the fruits are rotten at TBN. By their fruits ye shall know them.
ewwwwwwww
I think the toughest problem to tackle would be the issue of mainstream/orthodox Christians being boring--not because they are in fact boring, but because, as you say, a lot of people's taste runs to tacky, and because people tend to like emotional rather than sound teaching.
I understand the money issue. And I certainly don't suggest that Norman Geisler, Peter Kreeft, etc. should be (or would be) in it for the money. In fact, I think someone running a network who puts such Christians on air should be prepared to be non-profit, or even to operate at a loss. The idea of it being a money-making enterprise gives me the willies. I'd like to see it done as a countermeasure, as contending for the faith. So many people are misled by the likes of the Crouches, and there just aren't enough people, at least on TV, speaking against them. So many people get their theology from the TV--why shouldn't it be a battlefield as much as anyplace else?
The Crouches give many older, lonely shut-ins something very valuable, a feeling of family and belonging. I've always thought that was worth a lot. It's not our job (or the Times) to decide who God uses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.