Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new Steyn: CBS falls for Kerry campaign's fake memo
Chicago Sun Times ^ | September 12 2004 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/11/2004 8:31:00 AM PDT by Pitiricus

few weeks ago, Thomas Oliphant of the Boston Globe was on PBS' ''Newshour'' explaining why the hundreds of swift boat veterans' allegations against John Kerry's conduct in Vietnam was unworthy of his attention. "The standard of clear and convincing evidence," he said, talking to Swiftvet John O'Neill as if he were a backward fourth-grader, ''is what keeps this story in the tabloids -- because it does not meet basic standards.''

Last week, we got a good idea of what Thomas Oliphant's ''basic standards'' are. Dan Rather and the elderly gentlemen at ''60 Minutes'' were all atwitter because they'd come into possession of some hitherto undiscovered memos relating to whether George W. Bush failed to show up for his physical in the War of 1812. The media had been flogging this dead horse all spring, but these newly ''discovered'' memos had jump-started the old nag just enough to get him on his knees long enough for the media to flog him all over again.

Unfortunately for CBS, Dan Rather's hairdresser sucks up so much of the budget that there was nothing left for any fact-checking, so the ''60 Minutes'' crew rushed on air with a damning National Guard memo conveniently called ''CYA'' that Bush's commanding officer had written to himself 32 years ago. ''This was too hot not to push,'' one producer told the American Spectator. Hundreds of living Swiftvets who've signed affidavits and are prepared to testify on camera -- that's way too cold to push; we'd want to fact-check that one thoroughly, till, say, midway through John Kerry's second term. But a handful of memos by one dead guy slipped to us by a Kerry campaign operative -- that meets ''basic standards'' and we gotta get it out there right away.

The only problem was the memo. Amazingly, this guy at the Air National Guard base, Lt. Col. Killian, had the only typewriter in Texas in 1973 using a prototype version of the default letter writing program of Microsoft Word, complete with the tiny little superscript thingy that automatically changes July 4th to July 4th. To do that on most 1973 typewriters, you had to unscrew the keys, grab a hammer and give them a couple of thwacks to make the ''t'' and ''h'' squish up all tiny, and even think it looked a bit wonky. You'd think having such a unique typewriter Killian would have used a less easily traceable model for his devastating ''CYA'' memo. Also, he might have chosen a font other than Times New Roman, designed for the Times of London in the 1930s and not licensed to Microsoft by Rupert Murdoch (the Times' owner) until the 1980s.

Killian is no longer around to confirm his extraordinary Magic Typewriter, but his son denied the stuff was written by his dad, and his widow said her late husband never typed. So, on the one hand, we have hundreds of living veterans with chapter and verse on Kerry's fantasy Christmas in Cambodia, and, on the other hand, we have a guy who's been dead 20 years but is still capable of operating Windows XP. It took the savvy chappies at the Powerline Web site and Charles Johnson of ''Little Green Footballs'' about 20 minutes to spot the eerily 2004 look of the 1972 memo, and various Internet wallahs spent the rest of the day tracking down the country's leading typewriter identification experts.

Bombarded with accusations that CBS had fallen for an obvious hoax, Dan turned to his trusty Smith-Corona and bashed out a few e-mails: ''For the umpteenth time,'' he said angrily, ''this is the kind of sleaze I had to put up with when they scoffed at 'What's the frequency, Kenneth?' "

Are Dan Rather and ''60 Minutes'' a bunch of patsies suckered by the Kerry campaign? Not exactly. According to the American Spectator, ''The CBS producer said that some alarm bells went off last week when the signatures and initials of Killian on the documents in hand did not match up with other documents available on the public record, but producers chose to move ahead with the story.''

Hey, why not? Who's gonna spot it? If CBS says it's so, that's good enough for Thomas Oliphant's Boston Globe, the New York Times and the Washington Post, all of whom rushed the story onto their front pages because it met their ''basic standards.'' On Friday morning, Paul Krugman, the New York Times' excitable economist, filed a column called, ''The Dishonesty Thing,'' and for one moment I thought he was about to upbraid CBS for rushing on air with their laughably fake memos. But no, he was droning on about how the National Guard story demonstrated George W. Bush's ''pattern of lies: his assertions that he fulfilled his obligations when he obviously didn't ..."

The tragedy for Rather, Oliphant, Krugman and Co. is that even if the memos were authentic nobody would care. Their boy Kerry had a crummy August not because he didn't hammer Bush for being AWOL in the Spanish-American War but because the senator's AWOL in the present war. Big Media are trashing their own reputations in service to a man who can never win.

After the 2002 election, I wrote, ''Remind me never to complain about 'liberal media bias' again. Right now, liberal media bias is conspiring to assist the Democrats to sleepwalk over the cliff.''

The media and the Democrats sustain each other's make-believe land. Dan Rather tells his staff, ''Kerry's told me there's nothing to this Swiftvet thing.'' Kerry tells his, ''Rather's assured me this Swiftvet story's going nowhere.''

George W. Bush ought to wake up every morning and thank the Lord the media aren't on his side.

Remember the Hitler Diaries? They turned up in the '80s. Only problem is they weren't by Hitler. But by then various prestige publications had paid a fortune to serialize them. Among them was the Sunday Times of London, owned by Murdoch, who wasn't happy. He called the editor, Frank Giles, into his office, and said, ''Frank, I'm promoting you to editor emeritus.''

''I've always wondered,'' murmured Frank, ''what 'editor emeritus' means.''

''The 'e-' means you've been given the elbow and the '-meritus' means you bloody deserve it,'' said Murdoch.

I have a feeling after November CBS News will be promoting Dan Rather to editor emeritus.

Either that, or next week's ''60 Minutes'' -- ''Exclusive! Handwriting Expert Says Bush Wrote The Hitler Diaries!'' -- will have much better fact-checking.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; cbs; documents; forgery; killian; marksteyn; mediabias; oliphant; rather; rathergate; selectricgate; steyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Pitiricus
The media and the Democrats sustain each other's make-believe land. Dan Rather tells his staff, ''Kerry's told me there's nothing to this Swiftvet thing.'' Kerry tells his, ''Rather's assured me this Swiftvet story's going nowhere.''

Gotta love the circular self-referencing media. No experts or evidence needed--"If Rather and Couric said it then it must be true!"

41 posted on 09/11/2004 10:17:31 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

I'm frankly amazed at the origional story to begin with. I guess I couldn't be president becasue I had to sit in a corner with a dunce cap on in kindergarden.

The Democrats are desperately grasping at anything they can get.


42 posted on 09/11/2004 10:21:26 AM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

mark steyn is on hugh hewitt's first hour each week.
(i think tuesday, but maybe monday or wednesday)


43 posted on 09/11/2004 11:02:55 AM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: randog
Gotta love the circular self-referencing media. No experts or evidence needed--"If Rather and Couric said it then it must be true!"

That was rather's big argument yesterday! "I know the story is true." Case closed.

The arrogance is staggering. It even extends to his inability to recognize how foolish he looks in that safari jacket.

44 posted on 09/11/2004 11:07:08 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: doblin

'I'm wondering if this is actionable from a legal standpoint.

It's my sense that CBS affiliates may be subject to stiff fines for violating FCC regulations prohibiting false or deceptive radio transmissions. We need to encourage our congress critters to raise a clamor calling for proper enforcement of FCC regulations in this matter. This is way more serious than JJ's wardrobe malfunction.

Also I think that each member of the electorate has cause against CBS and ViaComm for the attempted fraud and election tampering that the Sixty Minutes show was.

Freedom of speech allows people to tell lies to advance their politics but the electronic media is held to a higher standard. Broadcasters are licensed to operate "in the public interest" using the public resource of the RF spectrum.'

``````````````````````````````````````````

Should the FCC choose to investigate this, they would have to investigate charges from both sides, the dems would insist on that...

so they should investigate Rathergate AND the Swifties. Sounds okay to me......


45 posted on 09/11/2004 11:18:14 AM PDT by bitt ("I'm Mad as Zell, and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore." (CongressmanBillybob))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bitt

"Should the FCC choose to investigate this, they would have to investigate charges from both sides, the dems would insist on that...

so they should investigate Rathergate AND the Swifties. Sounds okay to me......"

I don't believe that anything the Swifties has done is subject to FCC regulations. Their paid ads, true or false, are covered by the first amendment. Kerry could file a libel suit if he thought he could win.

The television network and affiliate are in violation of FCC regulations if they are responsible for a broadcast transmission with false or deceptive content.


46 posted on 09/11/2004 11:59:30 AM PDT by doblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: All
IMHO, Oliphant came across as very extremely pompous as repeatedly condescended to lecture O´Neil, ( who is a successful career attorney ), on what is reliable evidence. Steyn is right on with this piece pointing out the jaded hypocrisy of these liberal scribes.
47 posted on 09/11/2004 12:19:59 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Maria S; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; amom; Alamo-Girl

Thanks for the 60 Minutes II link. This is my modest effort:

Dear Sirs,

I am writing to protest the blatant partisanship shown by Dan Rather and CBS in its recent trashing of our President with documents that have been shown at many levels to be fake. Furthermore, you have ignored stories which have living credible witnesses who are raising serious questions about John Kerry's qualifications to lead. Of course, I am referring here to the blind spot in your coverage of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth story.

It is my opinion that CBS needs to do some serious house cleaning. It also should get a clue about returning to basic journalistic principles which I learned at the knee of my high school journalism teacher, such as:

"a journalist must be accurate accurate accurate," and "a journalist must be impartial impartial impartial," otherwise, "a journalist becomes not credible not credible not credible."



Sincerely,
TEXOKIE


48 posted on 09/11/2004 1:09:40 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Father in Heaven, take command of America and her Mission, her leaders, her people, and her troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt
It's my sense that CBS affiliates may be subject to stiff fines for violating FCC regulations prohibiting false or deceptive radio transmissions.

My wife works at an ABC affiliate and she told me a few nights ago (when this whole thing blew up) that CBS could face stiff fines. She didn't know the details and I'm waiting to talk to the station GM to learn some of the finer points of the law.

49 posted on 09/11/2004 1:21:38 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

50 posted on 09/11/2004 2:24:54 PM PDT by IPWGOP (I'm Linda Eddy, and I approved this message... 'tooning the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

we need to ping to any corporate or media lawyers - know any?


51 posted on 09/11/2004 2:37:49 PM PDT by bitt ("I'm Mad as Zell, and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore." (CongressmanBillybob))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

Contact Dan's bosses:

Sumner M. Redstone, chairman/CEO - Viacom

sumner.redstone@viacom.com

Leslie Moonves, president/CEO, CBS -

leslie.moonves@tvc.cbs.com


52 posted on 09/11/2004 2:39:26 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

Devastinwg. Its like shooting fish in a barrel with one of the helicopter machine guns.


53 posted on 09/11/2004 2:42:15 PM PDT by VRWC_minion ( I'll send email telling you where to send check.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; Nick Danger; JohnHuang2; Pokey78; Happygal; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; ...
Remember the Hitler Diaries? They turned up in the '80s. Only problem is they weren't by Hitler. But by then various prestige publications had paid a fortune to serialize them. Among them was the Sunday Times of London, owned by Murdoch, who wasn't happy. He called the editor, Frank Giles, into his office, and said, ''Frank, I'm promoting you to editor emeritus.''

''I've always wondered,'' murmured Frank, ''what 'editor emeritus' means.''

''The 'e-' means you've been given the elbow and the '-meritus' means you bloody deserve it,'' said Murdoch.

I have a feeling after November CBS News will be promoting Dan Rather to editor emeritus.

We hope.

54 posted on 09/11/2004 3:10:54 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The GM at the station my wife works at should know the law. I'll ping you after I talk to him.


55 posted on 09/11/2004 6:21:47 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus
''For the umpteenth time,'' he said angrily, ''this is the kind of sleaze I had to put up with when they scoffed at 'What's the frequency, Kenneth?' "

Notice how Dan behaved just like John McCain here? "I had a bad experience and heard all sorts of crap. This current stuff is a bad experience, therefore, it must all be crap."
56 posted on 09/11/2004 6:29:41 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Notice how Dan behaved just like John McCain here?

It's better than Kerry:

"John McCain and Max Cleland had a bad experience and heard all sorts of crap. This current stuff is a bad experience, therefore, it must all be crap."

57 posted on 09/11/2004 6:56:28 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Excellent contrast between the old media reaction to Swifties and the old media reaction to forged CBS memos.


58 posted on 09/11/2004 7:31:27 PM PDT by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
the . . . producer for Wednesday night's broadcast was the same one from the Abu Ghraib picture scandal . . . which broke on the first day of the Swift Boat press conference.
Really?!!

Now that puts a different light on the question of the SBVT response to this thing!!

I would think that would add up to a reason to sue CBS. Somebody sure should.


59 posted on 09/12/2004 3:47:16 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

Nice work!


60 posted on 09/12/2004 3:50:44 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson