This is extremely well written and well organized. It however is "safe siding" the issue to the point of barf alert. Heck I personally predicted a terror attack inside the USA in print way back in 1990! Look what happened.....Sept 11th! Precognition? Nope. Common sense.
The first sentence of this piece says it's time to connect the dots again. But this would have been better served if it had come a year ago, because it all would have been valid then and more useful. A nuclear attack within a decade? How about within the next MONTH?
The mullahs have already issued the decree that failure to produce two nuclear devices by January 2005 (Inauguration day is Jan 20th) means rejection of the faith. I can't imagine a stronger motivator. To paraphrase: Give Allah the nuclear fist or you're not a Muslim. Why the big push for January? Inauguration Day? Maybe. I think it's more likely to deliver a followup punch to our country, already ravaged by a WMD terror attack on US soil delivered by AQ and in conjunction with the concurrent low tech attacks sure to be in progress. The individual suicide bombers in malls, the truck bombings at infrastructure targets and the street level attacks against helpless Americans. Please note that these latter will probably be happening in areas where 2nd Amendment rights are nonexistent.
I look back on the paragraph I have just written and acknowledge that even to myself, I sound like some kind of post apocalyptic nut case covered in tinfoil......before September 11th 2001 Recent events seem to say otherwise.
And he also stated that 'good' muslims will make sure these nukes are ready to go then
Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons