Thanks for doing this. I was just thinking it would be a good idea, but had no clue how to accumulate all the reasons.
Proof positive the forger was someone from DU.
Need to correct (drop) your item 21 - I looked at all the GWB records released and in a couple of instances the PO Box 34567 does appear on official documents
CBS has already released a statement that the documents were so xeroxed and fixed were "difficult" to examine. This is incredible.
What they are trying to cover up is that the experts are now looking at pixel area and pattern.
That is a photo from the MSNBC website.
CBS knows that if the experts can determine the forgery, they will try to hide behind the fact that the documents were "copied and faxed too many times."
The forgers copied them 20 times to make them look old. I can make my last month electric bill look old by putting it through the copier 4 times.
CBS will try to hide behind the criminality of their own forgery.
Great idea. I'm glad to see it all in one place.
But, But, But,....
I heard Dan on the radio at 9 Eastern say that he had a response to #46 (the "th" thing). Y'know he found a "th" on an old Courier document that looked compressed. So there!
So your other 47 stinking objections don't count, OK?
It would be nice if someone posted this list on a website and kept it up to date for reference.
Don't give Rather any straw men to knock down:
> Box 34567 is suspicious, at best.
But appears in a known-valid Bush doc, a DD 44.
I'd drop this as evidence of forgery.
> 26. Kerning was not available
And may not be present in the forgeries. Kerning is off
by default in MS Word, and a non-kerned effort generates
a match that is more than adequately close. The kerning
charge is not needed.
Add: compare dates to where Bush actually was on
those dates.
There's been so much info,it's been hard to keep straight.
This will make things easier for anyone to understand,particularly people that aren't FReepers.
Add: Wife and son of Killian disclaim and doubt documents.
Apart from that resounding non-endorsement on its face,
these "documents" obviously did not come from Killian's
"personal files".
Also just to add to and clarify your point 8 - "signature block" - following the stated rank, the caption "TX ANG" is missing from the CBS hoax documents - all GWB records (as well as my own form the same period at Ellington) carry this standard (military branch) designation
I LOVE you! May I pass it on?
Now what? How can we get CBS to fess up?
Capt. Rather On Bridge!
'Rats Deserting Ship!
I'd also bet that no authenticated AF document can be found from that time period that contains the Times-Roman font.
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Perhaps the whole list needs to start with:
0. The "documents" in question can be trivially recreated,
with high precision, by using Microsoft Word, under default
settings of the program. This places the documents in the
late 1980s if not more recent.
Occam's Razor (the simplest explanation is the most
likely), suggests that this becomes the leading candidate
explanation for the source of these documents, and covers
all of the objections following.
Historical explanations require answering all of the
following.
Bump
Number 5 is a problem. I just sent a copy of Courier 10 pt to Howlin that has a closed 4, but it also has a foot at the bottom.