Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taliban leader (Mullar Omar) phoned U.S. after missile strikes (in 1998)
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 9/10/04 | William C. Mann - AP

Posted on 09/10/2004 6:03:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AP) - A day after former President Clinton sent cruise missiles against al-Qaida targets in Afghanistan, the leader of that country's ruling Taliban militia telephoned the State Department and offered to talk, according to a State Department message disclosed Friday.

Little came of the contact, although Mullah Mohammed Omar counseled the department that the United States would never be accepted as a friend of the Muslims unless Congress forced Clinton to resign.

Clinton announced Aug. 21, 1998, that he had sent cruise missiles "to strike at the network of radical groups affiliated with and funded by Osama bin Laden, perhaps the pre-eminent organizer and financier of international terrorism in the world today."

The attacks were to retaliate for the bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa two weeks earlier that killed 231 people. Bin Laden, mastermind behind the al-Qaida terror network, was blamed for those as well as the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States.

He had established training camps in Afghanistan under Omar's protection. His camps and a pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, that was thought to have been connected with bin Laden were targets of the cruises. Bin Laden and his comrades escaped.

After Sept. 11, U.S. forces invaded Afghanistan and in a brief campaign brought down the Taliban government and put bin Laden to flight. Both Omar and bin Laden remain at large.

The message, drafted by Michael E. Malinowski, then the head of the State Department's Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh desk, reported what is believed to be the first and perhaps only U.S. contact with the rabidly anti-American Muslim cleric.

After a translator confirmed that the caller on an open State Department line was Omar, the message said, "Malinowski noted that we had much to speak about, especially the continued presence of Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan and the threat that bin Laden posed to Americans."

"Omar replied that, while he had no particular message for us, he was open to dialogue," the message said. "Malinowski suggested that open telephone lines were inappropriate for that serious dialogue."

The message was provided to The Associated Press by the National Security Archive, an independent nongovernmental research group based at George Washington University that collects previously secret government documents. The archive said it obtained the document through a Freedom of Information Act request.

In summarizing his conversation with Omar, Malinowski said the Afghan "parroted some of bin Laden's hard-line views" but listened to U.S. arguments on why Clinton ordered the attacks against Afghanistan and Sudan and "the reasons why bin Laden's continued activities were not in the interest of the Afghan people."

"Omar warned that the U.S. strikes would prove counterproductive and arouse anti-American feelings in the Islamic world," the message said. They could spark more, not fewer, terror attacks, it said.

In another section, Malinowski wrote, "He said that in order to rebuild U.S. popularity in the Islamic world and because of (Clinton's) current domestic difficulties Congress should force President Clinton to resign."

At the time, Clinton was under intense pressure of his affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Some Republicans suggested that he may have sent the missiles to divert attention from the scandal.

The Taliban leader told Malinowski he knew of no evidence that bin Laden had planned our carried out terror attacks from Afghanistan.

"Malinowski replied that there was considerable evidence against bin Laden, and that the evidence was solid," the message said. "He noted that Omar and the Taliban should be well aware of what bin Laden had been up to in Afghanistan."

"Omar conducted himself in a careful and controlled manner," Malinowski wrote. "At no time did he bluster or threaten."

In a paragraph marked "comment," Malinowski said: "Omar's contact with a (U.S.) official is rather remarkable, given his reclusive nature and his past avoidance of contact with all things American.

"It is indicative of the seriousness of how the Taliban view the U.S. strikes and our anger over bin Laden."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1998; afghanistan; after; archives; billclinton; binladen; clinton; clintonlegacy; kenya; leader; lewinsky; malinowski; michaelemalinowski; michaelmalinowski; mikeemalinowski; mikemalinowski; missile; monicalewinsky; mullahomar; mullar; nsa; omar; osamabinladen; phoned; strikes; strikes1998; taliban; tanzania; usembassyplot; usembassyplots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: doug from upland

This is B.S. IOW, the Evil Republican Congress was doing the will of Osama Bin Laden by impeaching Clinton. This is laughable.


21 posted on 02/14/2005 10:15:19 PM PST by streetpreacher (There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

22 posted on 02/14/2005 10:17:40 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

LOL


23 posted on 02/14/2005 10:18:15 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Lately, I'm getting pings on a lot of threads from a year or two ago.


24 posted on 02/14/2005 10:19:38 PM PST by HAL9000 (Links to News Sources - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340399/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

People are doing a lot of research -- and fortunately we had some of these things posted.

Nothing irritates me more now than looking at a bookmark and the article not being there.


25 posted on 02/14/2005 10:28:47 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ikka; nutmeg

"Remember when Clinton was being impeached, the argument was "how much damage can he do in 2 years"? THIS MUCH..."


That's very true.

But, you could look at it this way.
We may have Mullah Omar to thank
for not having President Gore.

Thanks for the ping, nutmeg.


26 posted on 02/14/2005 10:30:49 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: piasa; Howlin; kcvl
"Omar warned that the U.S. strikes would prove counterproductive and arouse anti-American feelings in the Islamic world," the message said. They could spark more, not fewer, terror attacks, it said.

Hmmmmm .. How does that saying go???

Oh Yea ... now I remember

What did Clinton know and when did he know it?

It's not every day we get a phone call from a terrorists

27 posted on 02/14/2005 10:38:11 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

To much , but then again we are talking Mr.Bill .


28 posted on 02/14/2005 10:51:13 PM PST by Deetes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bttt


29 posted on 02/14/2005 11:35:50 PM PST by lainde ( ...we are not European, we are American, and we have different principles!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
It's not every day we get a phone call from a terrorists.

NO KIDDING!

I wonder how many "reporters" will be asking Hillary what her "husband" knew and when he knew it? I forgot. It's more important to them to trash Jeff Gannon. We wouldn't want them to actually LOOK for the answers. They would rather play gotcha with President Bush.

30 posted on 02/15/2005 1:59:02 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher; Howlin

Ya gotta remember that one of Kerry's long-time buddies ran the National Security Archives when they dug this up.


31 posted on 02/15/2005 3:10:51 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Fedora; streetpreacher; Mo1

Morton Halperin is the guy's name...

See:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1236609/posts


32 posted on 02/15/2005 3:21:05 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

The message was provided to The Associated Press by the National Security Archive, an independent nongovernmental research group based at George Washington University that collects previously secret government documents. The archive said it obtained the document through a Freedom of Information Act request.
33 posted on 02/15/2005 3:27:37 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Bump for later read


34 posted on 02/15/2005 6:55:12 AM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I wonder how many "reporters" will be asking Hillary what her "husband" knew and when he knew it? I forgot. It's more important to them to trash Jeff Gannon

Yep .. a picture of a guy in his boxers is much much more important then our national security and a phone call from a known terrorst during Clinton's term

35 posted on 02/15/2005 6:58:52 AM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Thanks for the ping! On Halperin also see:

NOMINATION OF MORTON HALPERIN TO BE THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEMOCRACY AND PEACEKEEPING (Senate - October 21, 1993)

Morton Halperin: An Indefensible Defense Nominee

36 posted on 02/15/2005 10:58:25 AM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson