Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ONE MORE PUSH TO END THE CLINTON GUN BAN
NRA-ILA_Alerts.UM.A.2.2212@www.nranews.org | 9/10/04 | NRA-ILA

Posted on 09/10/2004 12:59:06 PM PDT by Richard-SIA

From: NRA-ILA_Alerts.UM.A.2.2212@www.nranews.org Subject: ONE MORE PUSH TO END THE CLINTON GUN BAN Date: September 8, 2004 3:45:44 PM PDT ----------------------------------------------------------------- AN URGENT MESSAGE TO NRA MEMBERS: ONE MORE PUSH TO END THE CLINTON GUN BAN

With only five days to go before the September 13th expiration of the 1994 Clinton gun ban, anti-gun activists across the nation are making a last stand to re-enact this ineffective legislation. But now time is running out. Congress is only in session three more days before the sunset, and because time is short, anti-gunners will be redoubling their efforts to extend the ban.

Originally enacted in 1994, the Clinton crime bill banned gun ownership by law-abiding citizens as the solution to violent crime. But anti-gun politicians were only able to pass the portion of the law banning military-style semi-automatic firearms after agreeing to "sunset" the ban in a decade.

Proponents of the ban have not been able to offer a shred of evidence over ten years that the Clinton gun ban has reduced crime. The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) commissioned an independent study that concluded, "We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence." Even one extremist gun ban group, the Violence Policy Center, has admitted that continuing the ban will not "make one whit of difference one way or another . . . if it doesn't pass, it doesn't pass." (National Public Radio, 3/11/2004)

Since the gun banners are trying now to persuade Members of Congress to renew the Clinton Gun Ban, we ask you to call, fax and e-mail your Representative today. Urge your Member of Congress to publicly oppose renewal of the ban and instead to support legislation that will actually remove violent criminals from America's streets. Please urge your family, friends and fellow hunters and shooters to do the same. Help dismantle part of the anti-gun Clinton legacy by acting today!

Senate: (202) 224-3121 http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

House: (202) 224-3121 http://www.house.gov/writerep/

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

P.S. Learn more about this very timely and important issue by clicking on www.ClintonGunBan.com -- view the story and take the quiz.

____________________________________________________________ Please do not reply to this email as you will not receive a response. This email is a broadcast list generated by an automated system. To contact NRA-ILA call 800-392-8683.


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bush; congress; constitution; crime; firearm; gun; guncontrol; highcapacity; hunting; kerry; nra; presidentbush; protection; rkba; secondamendment; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SkyPilot

They don't make 'clips' for Glocks. They do make magazines though. Clips don't have moving parts and mags do. Clips are a strip that holds rounds that are pushed into a magazine. A magazine is inserted into the weapon. I guess you know that and just got your words mixed up.


21 posted on 09/10/2004 8:50:00 PM PDT by Mr Cobol (Berry AuH2O464 and conservative ever since!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: varmintxer

Garand en-bloc clips are inserted in the weapon, then ejected with a distinctive CHING sound after the eighth round is fired.


22 posted on 09/11/2004 6:49:44 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR (Don't blame me - I voted for McClintock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

It's not technically safe I assume, but it'll be over tomorrow night, and won't be in session again until Monday.

In 36 hours from when I post this, it'll be gone.

I believe they'll have to start an entirely new bill at this point. Probably a worse one. As long as we keep the House, even if Kerry wins I don't think they'll vote for it for sure.

Kerry would get nothing through.


23 posted on 09/11/2004 6:54:12 AM PDT by Kornev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vigilence
The second amendment only applies to the federal government -- the states are bound only by their respective state constitutions.

In California's case, there is nothing in their state constitution which protects the RKBA.

24 posted on 09/11/2004 12:53:32 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I believe that Bush is a lot more conservative than you would be lead to believe by the past four years with things like the huge spending deficit and the prescription drug program, but he had to do those things to stay in power long enough to get the momentum in the right direction.

The next four years are going to be awesome.

I agree and will happily take back these words if the next four years prove Bush more liberal.


25 posted on 09/12/2004 1:53:49 PM PDT by votelife (Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson