Skip to comments.
(Cornell) Lecture on Female Orgasm (Masturbation as Alternative to Marriage in Ithaca)
Cornell Daily Sun ^
| September 10, 2004
| by Xiaowei Cathy Tang
Posted on 09/10/2004 7:46:54 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I loved this guy in "Fargo."
41
posted on
09/10/2004 8:24:15 AM PDT
by
drjimmy
To: Behind Liberal Lines
42
posted on
09/10/2004 8:31:58 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
To: dead
I shouldn't have asked.Yeah. Thanks a lot.
43
posted on
09/10/2004 8:36:02 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Don't these people have anything better to do? Do people need to be taught this stuff? Is marriage actually about sexual stimulation? Even a cat can't replace having a husband.
To: drjimmy
What a couple of lookers!!! I bet they became a "couple" in desparation - but then again they look like bro & sis.
45
posted on
09/10/2004 8:46:33 AM PDT
by
Humvee
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Solot and Miller proceeded to ask students what they had heard about the female orgasm from their parents,Yea, right. As if this is the subject of dinnertime conversations.
"Well, Jenny, how was your masturbatory orgasm today?"
46
posted on
09/10/2004 8:46:43 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: blackdog
I knew someone would take the bait!! :-)
47
posted on
09/10/2004 8:47:30 AM PDT
by
Moleman
(Come on now, take the bait...)
To: Gingersnap
"This is like needing lessons to get drunk. Those poor kids!"
I remember in health class we were taught how to cut finger nails and wash behind our ears. It seemed stupid to me, but apparently there are people out there who are just plain dumb and honestly couldn't tell the difference between their @ss and a hole in the ground.
In other words, if they aren't told, in so many words, how to do something, the chances of them figuring it out for themselves is nil. The people who teach this sort of inanity are the same type of people. Thick as bricks.
48
posted on
09/10/2004 8:48:49 AM PDT
by
flaminco
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I'm all for anything that keeps these idiots from breeding.
49
posted on
09/10/2004 8:49:23 AM PDT
by
Cosmo
(There are no memos of mass destruction, no stockpiles, no reconstituted nuclear memo programs)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Oh, hell, maybe if the chicks at Cornell (and I use "chicks" loosely) know how to get off they'll stop JUMPING OFF BRIDGES.
50
posted on
09/10/2004 8:49:50 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("The common man doesn't look at me as some rich witch." --Teresa Heinz Kerry)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Hey, why all the criticism? You know, different strokes for different folks.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
forget all that election year stuff! who cares about terrorism!
THIS IS NEWS!!!
To: Behind Liberal Lines
This is all taught so they occupy their time this way. Otherwise they'd notice the rats were screwing them hard.
53
posted on
09/10/2004 8:59:54 AM PDT
by
spunkets
To: Moleman; Owl_Eagle; TheBigB
How does a real man know if his wife/girlfriend has had an orgasam?When he comes in at 2 a.m. and she doesn't seem to mind!
54
posted on
09/10/2004 9:00:33 AM PDT
by
HenryLeeII
(sultan88, R.I.P.)
To: Fudd
"Sure, this "alternative" to marriage may be fun. But who's going to take out the trash, squash the bug in the sink, and open the jar of pickles? Who's going to wrestle and roughhouse with the kids, show them how to throw a football, show the sons how to use a urinal?"
The hairy-arpitted butch lesbo. Who else? What's wrong with you people? Don't you know that it is wrong to teach little girls to keep their fingers out of their organs in front of polite company? It teaches them to be ashamed.
On a more serious note: there is actually an excellent reason to teach kids to not touch themselves sexually in front of others. Once I helped out in a day care center for a week and a little Polish girl (6 years old) was masturbating at nap time. The day care provider I was filling in for didn't mind, and I said pretty soon everyone will be doing it, and surely, a few others were. That is, until I had a talk or two with them and discussed it with their parents. The liberals would be very angry with me. I said that is something we don't do in front of other people. I don't think I was teaching them to be ashamed, just that we don't do this in front of others. I am sure the liberal "teachers" would cite me as an example of someone who wants girls to be ashamed of their bodies.
We were told that feminism would liberate women from inequality and it originally was a moral movement. What they have done is liberate perverts from having to hide their sexual depravity and encouraged women to adopt some men's ungentlemanly habits.
To: spunkets
"Let's take a ten minute break, The next lecture will be given by Feminists for Mandatory Castration".
56
posted on
09/10/2004 9:17:41 AM PDT
by
Wristpin
To: Wristpin
" The next lecture will be given by Feminists for Mandatory Castration"."The idea is to keep the serf's minds occupied with sexual gratification, so they don't notice they are being screwed. To do that, they advance faggotry and other such perversions. They can both destroy the family and keep their minds occupied at the same time with this plan.
57
posted on
09/10/2004 11:13:55 AM PDT
by
spunkets
To: EdReform; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
Homosexual Agenda/Destruction of Marriage combined with the ever popular "Ithaca is the City of Evil" Alert.
The words "homosexual" or "gay" aren't mentioned, but they might as well be.
Worship of sex pleasure for its own sake, unrestrained by any morality or family responsibility, is not conducive to human civilization.
To put it mildly.
Let me and ItsOurTimeNow if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
(Hi, everyone!)
58
posted on
09/10/2004 11:57:02 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Islamo-Jihadis and Homosexual-Jihadis both want to destroy civilization.)
To: little jeremiah
While we are on this subject, if they don't get you to one of their seminars they will try to "educate" you through the womens magazines of course, everyone knows, but now even in formerly harmless magazines that you pick up for home decorating such as Country Home, Country Living etc., full of suggestive pictures of "girlfriends" hangin out together in their tshirts and undies reading on a big bed together, or such, etc., ... Yea, straight folks do this all the time???
59
posted on
09/10/2004 12:47:53 PM PDT
by
Esther Ruth
(As the mountains surround Jerusalem, so the Lord surrounds His people from this time forth & FOREVER)
To: Esther Ruth
Womens' magazines have been soft porn (or not so soft) for years. It's embarrassing to even read the names of the articles while standing in line. I have friends who avoid taking thier kids to the grocery store to protect them from the likes of Cosmopolitan, and even Ladies' Home Journal or whatever.
Girls are being programmed to be feminist sluts.
60
posted on
09/10/2004 2:11:45 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Islamo-Jihadis and Homosexual-Jihadis both want to destroy civilization.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson