Posted on 09/07/2004 6:09:33 PM PDT by hawaiian
So says drudge...
*Snicker*
Memo to John Kerry: this is NOT the Yale Debating Club.
The last incumbent (Clinton) only gave his challenger (Dole) two debates.
Oh, I forgot:
Bring your gun. You're gonna need it.
"President Bush may skip one of the three debates that have been proposed by the Commission on Presidential Debates... MORE... Bush's negotiating team plans to resist the middle debate, which was to be Oct. 8 in a town meeting format in Missouri // audience of 'undecided voters' for second debate was to be picked by Gallup. Bush officials were concerned that people could pose as undecided when they actually are partisans, WASH POST planning to report in new editions, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE... Developing... "
heh-heh
James is dialing this one up nicely if I might say so. He should have 2 for VP as well so we can see Cheney tear Edwards apart twice!
LOL
^5
Oh, blech, I am trying to get a ticket to the Missouri Wash U debate.
I remember the one where "Mr. Pony-Tail" asked what the candidates could do for him. W would be wise to take a pass on that theatre.
You have just proved a valuable point about this forum:
A good Freeper NEVER forgets a fact that he/she may need in rebuttal later on.
:-)
Not without a U.N. resolution first. He can't wipe his ass without getting TeRAYza's permission.
Actually, two is enough.
The MSM will go nuts.
Those who forget history are codemned to repeat it.
Good point. If Clinton only allowed two debates for his reelection, why should Bush go for more?
Bush should invite Nader and Sharpton and Kucinich too.
I assume you are referring to that sick gun/debate remark by Kerry. Here are two comments made earlier today (on this thread -- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1209218/posts ...... I Can't Take Gun To Debate With Me) from two Freepers that you may enjoy.
*****
"It's not so harmless if it encourages one of his supporters to act on it.
I have a very low tolerance for jokes about shooting the president no matter how harmless the intent.
Remember how Hinckley shot Reagan because he thought it would impress Jodie Foster? Who's to say that Kerry's thoughtless remark won't plant the same idea in some unhinged supporter? Remember too how the 'rats have cultivated an atmosphere of extreme hatred for the president..."
31 posted on 09/07/2004 8:43:02 AM PDT by 5by5
*****
"Saying that you want to be able to take a firearm to your debate with him could easily be construed as a threat.
It is also an inducement to others of like mind or on your "side" to signal your desire that they too should use a gun in a debate with President Bush.
Kerry is guilty of a Federal crime - he should be arrested, charged, and tried.
This is not a joke.
There are thousands of deranged, deluded, or ideologically motivated potential assasins out there.
Many would love to please the Democratic nominee, and he now has laughingly motivated them to harm the President.
This is NO joke.
It is very serious."
69 posted on 09/07/2004 9:53:45 AM PDT by Jonathan
Just some thoughts about Kerry's very stupid remark! And, just think what would have happened to Bush if he said this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.