1 posted on
09/06/2004 9:42:13 AM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Nachum
That'd be The Ultimate Arkancide.
2 posted on
09/06/2004 9:43:27 AM PDT by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: Nachum
3 posted on
09/06/2004 9:43:35 AM PDT by
zarf
To: Nachum
4 posted on
09/06/2004 9:43:43 AM PDT by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: Nachum
5 posted on
09/06/2004 9:44:07 AM PDT by
tioga
(GOP, the Grand Old Party. God Bless George W. Bush. Four More Years!)
To: Nachum
Sounds like standard procedure to me.
8 posted on
09/06/2004 9:44:35 AM PDT by
KJacob
(God's purpose is never the same as man's purpose.)
To: Nachum
Sounds like PMSNBC might be hoping to see Clinton pass on so Kerry can get a post-mortem bounce...
To: Nachum
Not surprising. I'd read *somewhere* that news outlets keep obits on hand, update them as needed, for aging celebrities. In the case of Clinton undergoing major surgery, who knows?
My hubby has said that people often lose several IQ points after bypass surgery. True or not true?
10 posted on
09/06/2004 9:45:12 AM PDT by
.38sw
To: Nachum; Admin Moderator
Obits are prewritten and updated for all famous people. But you know that, don't you?
11 posted on
09/06/2004 9:45:56 AM PDT by
Samwise
(Kerry is a self-made man. He created a doofus.)
To: Nachum
Newspapers have obituaries prepared for almost every famous American all the time. This is nothing unusual. I'm sure they had an obit for Bill Clinton long before today.
To: Nachum
Morbid, but practical. News organizations regularly update obituaries for famous, living people, so they'll have them ready if needed. If someone is ill/hospitalized, they're more likely to make sure their obit is updated.
13 posted on
09/06/2004 9:46:04 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(My handle is "kevkrom", and I approved this post.)
To: Nachum
They'd better hurry up and invent a legacy, first.
15 posted on
09/06/2004 9:46:19 AM PDT by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: Nachum
IOW, they have updated it. I'm sure every major media outlet is doing the same.
To: Nachum; aculeus
SOP is to write obits for public figures well in advance, revising them as events may warrant.
17 posted on
09/06/2004 9:46:34 AM PDT by
dighton
To: Nachum
This is not news.
Every major newspaper, wire service and broadcaster has stock obituaries of important public figures, updated regularly, ready to print or air on a moment's notice.
18 posted on
09/06/2004 9:46:57 AM PDT by
Loyalist
(This tagline has been put on hiatus for retooling.)
To: Nachum
Hillary probably reserves immediate rights to anything printed and Tim Russert's _ _ _ _ _!
19 posted on
09/06/2004 9:47:15 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Nachum
In the end.....tragedy T.V. will try and have the obvious angles covered.
While at first glance it's morbid...but it is realistic. And I could/can see where they wouldn't be very thorough..if they weren't at the very least somewhat prepared for that possible scenario.
FWIW-
21 posted on
09/06/2004 9:48:45 AM PDT by
Osage Orange
(I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.)
To: Nachum
Isn't the Anti-Christ supposed to be someone thought to have died?
22 posted on
09/06/2004 9:48:56 AM PDT by
airborne
(2/504 PIR - 'Devils In Baggy Pants')
To: Nachum
This is SOP with newspapers. Large ones and the wire services have obits prewritten in their files for famous people. However, broadcast outlets as a rule don't do this unless the person has been ill for a while or is very old because of the cost. (A few paragraphs on a piece of paper is much cheaper than professionally produced video footage).
23 posted on
09/06/2004 9:49:23 AM PDT by
asgardshill
(GWB throws heat. JF'nK throws spitballs.)
To: Nachum
All major news outlets, broadcast and print, have obits of famous people 'ready' just in case. They periodically update those files as necessary.
This is standard operating procedure (SOP); no surprise, nor anything out of the ordinary.
24 posted on
09/06/2004 9:50:35 AM PDT by
TomGuy
(His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
To: Nachum
Why is this news? This is standard. They should already have an obit on hand only needing tweaking to bring it to date.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson