Posted on 09/06/2004 2:16:56 AM PDT by k2blader
Re-typed verbatim from the 2004 Republican Party Platform (pages 80 and 81):
Supporting Humane and Legal ImmigrationThe Republican Party supports reforming the immigration system to ensure that it is legal, safe, orderly and humane. It also supports measures to ensure that the immigration system is structured to address the needs of national security. America is a stronger and better nation because of the hard work and entrepreneurial spirit of immigrants, and the Republican Party honors them. A growing economy requires a growing number of workers, and President Bush has proposed a new temporary worker program that applies when no Americans can be found to fill the jobs. This new program would allow workers who currently hold jobs to come out of the shadows and to participate legally in Americas economy. It would allow men and women who enter the program to apply for citizenship in the same manner as those who apply from outside the United States. There must be strong workplace enforcement with tough penalties against employees and employers who violate immigration laws. We oppose amnesty because it would have the effect of encouraging illegal immigration and would give an unfair advantage to those who have broken our laws.
To better ensure that immigrants enter the United States only through legal means that allow for verification of their identity, reconnaissance cameras, border patrol agents, and unmanned aerial flights have all been increased at the border. In addition, Border Patrol agents now have sweeping new powers to deport illegal aliens without having first to go through the cumbersome process of allowing the illegal alien to have a hearing before an immigration judge. We support these efforts to enforce the law while welcoming immigrants who enter America through legal avenues.
With mounted calvary against tanks no less.
Sounds like an ally that we should be proud to have.
Balls the size of grapefruit.
Sounds like amnesty to me.
When was this ever established as fact?
Lowering the minimum wage is a good idea. Can we just get rid of it altogether?
And regarding the reduction of taxes, absolutely no argument here.
And, in a perfect world, I would be voting for them. However, in this imperfect world, I would be helping John Kerry win and I can't do that.
The CP needs to run for congressional and state offices in the foreseeable future.
The U.S. Taxpayers, that's who!
For example, mandate that jobs paying over $6/hour must also pay $x into a private retirement fund, but jobs paying less don't pay, and you don't get the retirement benefit either.
For medical benefits, it's not as easy, as you realize. There's always the emergency room. There what I'm saying is first reduce the substantial advantage that illegal immigrants currently have for low paying (below minimum) jobs, then the enforcement that everyone else on this thread is advocating will have a decent chance.
As we learned during prohibition, enforcement doesn't work if it is swimming upstream against a strong capitalist current.
The current laws make a legal employee cost a minimum of perhaps $8 or $10 dollars per hour, compared to perhaps $2 or $3 for an illegal. This is way too strong a capitalist stream to swim against.
Get that difference down to something reasonable, and then a sensible level of enforcement can actually close the gap, so that reasonable self interested employees are left saying "sure, I could hire an illegal for a dollar or two less, but by the time I account for the risk of being caught, the illegal actually costs me more."
Agh! I agree with you on Alan Keyes, unspun, but here we must disagree.
These aren't "temporary workers"--they are criminals who illegally crossed our border. Their first actions in our nation were to break the law. Why should that be rewarded?
I'm a Christian conservative who will be voting (R) in 2004. After that, who knows. It depends on what the GOP does with itself during the following four years (yes, I think President Bush will win reelection) and who they run in 2008.
I'll be voting Constition party if they are allowed on the ballot.
It's not a waste of time.
If the platform "means very little at this point", why even publish it? It would be more honest for the (R)'s to do a press release saying something like, "We're better than the Democrats--just trust us."
Words mean something. Conservatives need to educate themselves on what their party stands for and take appropriate action where necessary.
That's not a job. That's slave labor.
These slave laborers then go to the emergency room for their medical care, at U.S. Taxpayer's expense, where it just so happens it will cost us $300 plus everytime they walk through the door? This is a solution? I think not.
This is the year 2004. What in the world kind of work are we talking about?
I've got the enforcement end of this scenario covered. How's this sound?
Anybody caught hiring an illegal alien or anybody else for $3.00 an hour ought to be put up against a wall and shot. Several times.
How's that for an incentive for these tightwads to swim their sorry Scrooge a$$es up that stream against that strong capitalist current?
LOL!
The Republican Party supports reforming the immigration system to ensure that it is legal, safe, orderly and humane.
Puke! The main issue that has changed my conservatism!
I will cast my vote against any "Republican" endorsing this plank of the campaign. Period.
You didn't change - they picked the "big tent" up around you, moved it to left field and now you're standing with the rest of the right-wingers wondering where that cold draft is coming from.
What's so ironic is that if you took the average liberal from MA or NC and gave him a tour of neighborhoods near the orange groves that used to be middle class, they'd jump right on our program of stopping immigration for a couple of generations.
But since the MSM never reports how close to a third world nation California has become, NE liberals think they've got it just fine. Nothing to worry about. Those racist nuts who want to stop immigration would just make their lettuce more expensive, nothing better!
One generation left to save California...
In my opinion, and I am someone who has been researching the illegal imigration issues for years(and has lived in SoCal as well as FL and Raleigh-all hispanic hypergrowth areas), we are doomed as a nation. Bush is all for open borders no matter what Karl Rove wants to call it and he takes the neocon wall street journal stance on this issue. If we cannot get someone like Tancredo into office in 08 our culture is pretty much over as we know it.
Your shocked by radical liberalism's advance the past 10 years? Just wait until we have open borders, our country will look like a hispanic third world mix of blade runner and france. The demoncats push communism and the neocons push socialism lite. I want neither! I am sick and tired of watching what is happening to this great country and I feel helpless to stop it. It sickens me that we have good men dying in Iraq fighting for their country and meanwhile Bush wont protect the damn borders from terrorist attack, nevermind all the illegal aliens. Homeland security? What a joke.
Check out this article about Bush's nephew(little puke):
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/mm20040825.shtml
So let's say you belive in most of the platform but you hate the Abortion part. You go vote for Kerry then? No, you are still going to vote for Bush...right? So my case is not folly.
CP certainly is much better in their wording than the RNC is, that's for sure, on this vital issue. Our hope is to try to torpedoe any cockamami immigration proposals during a Second Bush Administration, through the Congress, our voice on this issue. Even THAT, is a pipe dream I admit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.