Posted on 09/05/2004 7:30:16 PM PDT by ADSUM
THE FIVE NON-NEGOTIABLE ISSUES
These five current issues concern actions that are intrinsically evil and must never be promoted by the law. Intrinsically evil actions are those which fundamentally conflict with the moral law and can never be deliberately performed under any circumstances. It is a serious sin to deliberately endorse or promote any of these actions, and no candidate who really wants to advance the common good will support any action contrary to the non-negotiable principles involved in these issues.
1. Abortion
The Church teaches that, regarding a law permitting abortions, it is "never licit to obey it, or to take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or to vote for it" (EV 73). Abortion is the intentional and direct killing of an innocent human being, and therefore it is a form of homicide.
The unborn child is always an innocent party, and no law may permit the taking of his life. Even when a child is conceived through rape or incest, the fault is not the child's, who should not suffer death for others' sins.
2. Euthanasia
Often disguised by the name "mercy killing," euthanasia also is a form of homicide. No person has a right to take his own life, and no one has the right to take the life of any innocent person.
In euthanasia, the ill or elderly are killed, by action or omission, out of a misplaced sense of compassion, but true compassion cannot include intentionally doing something intrinsically evil to another person (cf. EV 73).
3. Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Human embryos are human beings. "Respect for the dignity of the human being excludes all experimental manipulation or exploitation of the human embryo" (CRF 4b).
Recent scientific advances show that often medical treatments that researchers hope to develop from experimentation on embryonic stem cells can be developed by using adult stem cells instead. Adult stem cells can be obtained without doing harm to the adults from whom they come. Thus there is no valid medical argument in favor of using embryonic stem cells. And even if there were benefits to be had from such experiments, they would not justify destroying innocent embryonic humans.
4. Human Cloning
"Attempts . . . for obtaining a human being without any connection with sexuality through 'twin fission,' cloning, or parthenogenesis are to be considered contrary to the moral law, since they are in opposition to the dignity both of human procreation and of the conjugal union" (RHL I:6).
Human cloning also involves abortion because the "rejected" or "unsuccessful" embryonic clones are destroyed, yet each clone is a human being.
5. Homosexual "Marriage"
True marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Legal recognition of any other union as "marriage" undermines true marriage, and legal recognition of homosexual unions actually does homosexual persons a disfavor by encouraging them to persist in what is an objectively immoral arrangement.
"When legislation in favor of the recognition of homosexual unions is proposed for the first time in a legislative assembly, the Catholic lawmaker has a moral duty to express his opposition clearly and publicly and to vote against it. To vote in favor of a law so harmful to the common good is gravely immoral" (UHP 10).
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Action Ping List.
Welcome to FR.
Shall I add you to the Catholic Ping List?
Have you checked out the Voter's Guide on Catholic Answers?
Might copy it off and send it to him annonymously.
Sorry. I have a list of who has ping lists for what topics. You were not on the list but I will add you under the Catholic topic. If you have other lists let me know, or if you know of other lists. I add them as I come across them.
Welcome to FR. May I add you to the Catholic Ping List?
Jesus said that He would rather we were hot or cold than lukewarm, and that claiming to separate church and state is a disingenous cop-out. For the individual, there is no separation, just the relationship between themselves and God.
thanks, that would be great
I'm not a Catholic, but I agree with each point made here.
One thing I'm curious about:
What is the conservative Catholic viewpoint on President Bush's decision to allow research to continue using "existing lines" of embryonic stem cells?
Separation of church and state does not separate morality and the state or separate the state from what is just plain right.
I presume one wouldn't get a response.
Someone could question candidate Kerry in the Presidential debates about why should the American public vote for Kerry if he doesn't follow his professed voluntary beliefs in his own religion?
"He claims that the seperation of church and state affords this." How would you counter this argument?
First, educate him about the fact there is no 'separation of church and state' clause in the Constitution. If he is receptive to that, then ask him, "What SEPARATES your soul from your conscience?
At least someone took the time to say it and make it available to others.
Some people will never understand or think for themselves.
Say a prayer and lead by example.
Say a prayer for him.
I know several lawyers educated at a prominent Jesuit Catholic University that seem to lack moral values when representing clients. Seems that economic interests are more important to them.
It can be very difficult to actually be a "Catholic" seven days a week.
I was pleased to find this little book at our church yesterday, right beside the Sunday bulletins. Apparently a lot of them had been put out before the Saturday evening Mass. I went to the 10:30 Mass, the last on for the weekend, Sunday. Only a few were left before Mass, and all were gone afterwards.
It is a joy to be in a parish were the priests understand canon law.
Bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.